Away to Blurrrghburn

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
adamworthy2002
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1903
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by adamworthy2002 » Sat Aug 31, 2013 6:58 pm

Knight has to be dropped. How can he not see what everybody else can?

He's god awful.


Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Lord Kangana » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:02 pm

James B wrote:the best thing freedman can do is to move on some of the overrated sh*te we have on the books but we aren't playing fm here and it's not easy. i do wonder if our little run toward the end of last season (which was a bit fortuitous imo) clouded his judgement a bit in the summer.

either way, it's hard to overhaul too much at once.
Without the run at the end of last season, it makes him no better than Coyle. Same players. Maybe it was just luck? What was rthe stat that CH put up? This is our worst start since 1984? Its like the sublime to the ridiculous in the blink of an eye.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:05 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:
James B wrote:the best thing freedman can do is to move on some of the overrated sh*te we have on the books but we aren't playing fm here and it's not easy. i do wonder if our little run toward the end of last season (which was a bit fortuitous imo) clouded his judgement a bit in the summer.

either way, it's hard to overhaul too much at once.
Without the run at the end of last season, it makes him no better than Coyle. Same players. Maybe it was just luck? What was rthe stat that CH put up? This is our worst start since 1984? Its like the sublime to the ridiculous in the blink of an eye.
But you can't really take away that run at the end of last season, because it happened.

If we took away the run that took us to 7th in the Prem and to a Cup Semi under Coyle, it'd probably have looked a whole lot bleaker...but wouldn't dream of taking that off him, he had plenty of time after that.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31611
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:09 pm

James B wrote:the best thing freedman can do is to move on some of the overrated sh*te we have on the books but we aren't playing fm here and it's not easy.
Name names, James. Who would you get shut of? Not picking on you, just wondering.

We must be talking about wage-hoggers, because of today's players, the majority have been bought or given contract extensions by DF - and one of the exceptions (Knight) he made captain, the other he spent much of summer talking up as the Missing Linkman (NGog):

......................Bogdan......................
Mears....Knight....Wheater....Baptiste
............Medo.........Spearing............
Pratley.........NGog..................Lee
....................Beckford....................

Subs used: Eagles (for Pratley 55), Moritz (for Ngog 58), C Davies (for Medo 79)
Unused subs: Lonergan, Mills, Tierney, Hall

...so unless the players whose lackadaisicality made him hop with rage are Mears, Pratley and Lee – all of whom DF chose over benched alternatives he had hired (Tierney for Mears with Bap switching across, Moritz for Pratley, Hall for Lee) - then for all the bad that unarguably happened under Coyle, we have to say a lot of it is now the incumbent's responsibility...

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Lord Kangana » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:10 pm

Then you can't blame the players now. That's having your cake and eating it.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31611
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:12 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Then you can't blame the players now. That's having your cake and eating it.
Me, or W4E?

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31611
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:14 pm

Relentless09 wrote:Think Dougie was trying to remain calm in that interview, seemed like he was angry with certain players.
Wonder if the subbed players were entirely tactical? Pratley 10 minutes into the second half, Ngog three minutes later... then Medo toward the end for a striker when we were really chasing it... might be 2+2=5 but for those who went, did Freedman seem irked by the first two players he hauled off?

James B
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1439
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:50 pm

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by James B » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:17 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
James B wrote:the best thing freedman can do is to move on some of the overrated sh*te we have on the books but we aren't playing fm here and it's not easy.
Name names, James. Who would you get shut of? Not picking on you, just wondering.

We must be talking about wage-hoggers, because of today's players, the majority have been bought or given contract extensions by DF - and one of the exceptions (Knight) he made captain, the other he spent much of summer talking up as the Missing Linkman (NGog):

......................Bogdan......................
Mears....Knight....Wheater....Baptiste
............Medo.........Spearing............
Pratley.........NGog..................Lee
....................Beckford....................

Subs used: Eagles (for Pratley 55), Moritz (for Ngog 58), C Davies (for Medo 79)
Unused subs: Lonergan, Mills, Tierney, Hall

...so unless the players whose lackadaisicality made him hop with rage are Mears, Pratley and Lee – all of whom DF chose over benched alternatives he had hired (Tierney for Mears with Bap switching across, Moritz for Pratley, Hall for Lee) - then for all the bad that unarguably happened under Coyle, we have to say a lot of it is now the incumbent's responsibility...
where do i start

it'd be easier to list the players i'm happy with

i'll leave out the new recruits as it's too early to judge

i like medo, spearing & eagles (although the latter is a bit hit & miss)

everyone else could go for all i care, obviously the smaller wage earners get more leeway.

obviously, as i alluded to earlier, it's unrealistic to expect such a massive overhaul, i just hope given time df gets rid of most of these wasters.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Lord Kangana » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:18 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Then you can't blame the players now. That's having your cake and eating it.
Me, or W4E?
Not you!
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:19 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Then you can't blame the players now. That's having your cake and eating it.
Me, or W4E?
I don't believe I've apportioned any blame yet, other than to say the buck ultimately stops with the Manager. :-)

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by bwfcdan94 » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:39 pm

Does anyone here think Dougies days are looking very numbered to the extent where a sacking could be very close on the horizon. bring in Aidy
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by LeverEnd » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:44 pm

Harry Genshaw wrote:I pity the fools that went to Ewood today
Learnt my lesson at Forest. Had this one pencilled in, but got the imaginary eraser out.
...

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by bobo the clown » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:06 pm

He very clearly stated that some players don't want to be at the club, as he said that if so they can exit on Monday.

Who might that be then ?

Mills ... but he can hardly be blamed I suppose.
Lee ? N'Gog ?
Mears .... I doubt that tbh
Eagles ??

Knight ? ... I fckg wish.

One way or the other DF has got to get under this confusion and sort it out.

It's a shambles.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:15 pm

Have we actually looked the better side in any of the games we've played so far? I've never felt we were in charge of any of them.

Stream commentator today remarked "Bolton have Premiership experience, trouble is they don't have Championship experience!" At that stage we could easily have been four down. By the end of the game, we were. We looked lacking in pace all over the field. Every time they attacked we were in danger of conceding another goal. The number of times we gave the ball away needlessly was frightening. We had little penetration in our build ups and one extended passing session finished up back to Bogdan, who I felt sorry for today. We really do need a long look at what's going wrong.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

StaffsTrotter
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by StaffsTrotter » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:32 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:Have we actually looked the better side in any of the games we've played so far? I've never felt we were in charge of any of them.

Stream commentator today remarked "Bolton have Premiership experience, trouble is they don't have Championship experience!" At that stage we could easily have been four down. By the end of the game, we were. We looked lacking in pace all over the field. Every time they attacked we were in danger of conceding another goal. The number of times we gave the ball away needlessly was frightening. We had little penetration in our build ups and one extended passing session finished up back to Bogdan, who I felt sorry for today. We really do need a long look at what's going wrong.
agree with you TD with your point about our not being comfortable and progressive in possession. As has been said before Medo & Spearing are battlers and thats it. The former gave the ball away continuously - pretty sure his misplaced pass led to the first goal. Also pretty sure our poor passing, control and movement created more chances for them than they created themselves through good play.

Makes me think DFs attempts to play more through the middle is flawed - not convinced we have the system or players in the side to do it

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Lord Kangana » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:41 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Then you can't blame the players now. That's having your cake and eating it.
Me, or W4E?
I don't believe I've apportioned any blame yet, other than to say the buck ultimately stops with the Manager. :-)
Ah, but you responded to one of my posts that was in itself a response to someone who was blaming the players. And I was pointing out the glaring flaw in that proposition. Namely that if 7th last season with the same players was down to the manager, how can this seasons poor start be down to us having poor players, when in the main they are trhe same players that got us to 7th? It does not follow.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

Enoch
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Location: The Garden of England.

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Enoch » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:55 pm

StaffsTrotter wrote:The former gave the ball away continuously
Really!

gizmothevoomer
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:01 pm

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by gizmothevoomer » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:57 pm

Whilst this seasons start has been significantly worse than anyone thought, reality needs to set in. At best this squad is an upper mid table team ( 7th -12th ). This year was always going to be more difficult, given the quality of the teams who came down and other sides being in a better position to strengthen.

Given our poor financial position it is unlikely that will improve unless someone pumps a large some of cash in as a sugar daddy. Reality is we are in this division for a few years.

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:10 pm

gizmothevoomer wrote:Reply with quote
As long as it's this division, not one with a number in it!
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

StaffsTrotter
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Away to Blurrrghburn

Post by StaffsTrotter » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:12 pm

Enoch wrote:
StaffsTrotter wrote:The former gave the ball away continuously
Really!
Yep - thought Medo was poor with possession for first half hour, improved a bit after that just a pity we were 2 down by then. Spearing wasn't much better.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dave the minion, Google [Bot] and 26 guests