No Jackett required?

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Relentless09
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Relentless09 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:20 am

truewhite15 wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:by the way everyone ... #41, on the bench ... Oscar Threlkeld.

Anyone know about the guy ?
New one on me. Did N'gog and Eagles make the bench? I missed the bench bit apart from knowing Knight, Moritz and Craig Davis came on.
Lee-Barrett, Knight, Moritz, Craig Davies, Ngog, Eagles and Threlkeld was the bench.

Threlkeld is a name that was vaguely familiar. One of those who seems to have been around our youth team so long that they might be 30-odd. Centre-back, if I recall correctly.
Apparently he's quick and can play right back as well, hopefully him and Kellet get a run out so we can see what they've got.

CarlosHernandez
Promising
Promising
Posts: 331
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm
Location: Torquay, Australia

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by CarlosHernandez » Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:36 am

bobo the clown wrote:by the way everyone ... #41, on the bench ... Oscar Threlkeld.

Anyone know about the guy ?
I asked the same question. The twitter feed said he's an academy player.

SmokinFrazier
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by SmokinFrazier » Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:17 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:Well, I thought we'd be discussing giving away the lead twice more than I did a 3-1 victory. Our three goals proved what we can do when we take the game to the opposition, so I've no idea why we spent most of the 90 minutes inviting them onto us.
I wasn't at the game yesterday but I've thought that for a while too. When we push forward and attack teams, we are far superior to when we sit back and invite pressure. I know you don't want a team to be reckless and go after everything but I think if we played attacking football throughout the game, we'd be in a much better position than we currently are. It's like we're expecting something which isn't there. When we focus on our strengths, we're a good side who have an attack that most defences will struggle to cope with, but why we give away our advantages so much is strange. We don't have to defend deep to keep our lead, we can negate the opposition threat by going forward ourselves. Hopefully this type of performance restores faith in our ability to create chances and score goals, anyway.

Enoch
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Location: The Garden of England.

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Enoch » Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:58 am

Well bugger me!

Easy tiger, I didn't mean that literally!!

Lots today that was pleasing, lots that wasn't, made me smile though. Best bit by far was the respect shown for the minute's silence.

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by LeverEnd » Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:42 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:
StaffsTrotter wrote: does anyone else feel a wee bit patronised ? or do we need educating ?
The fans were shouting "Knock it forward, get it up to the big man"? WHAT?????
At the point Ream burst forward I was getting irritated that no-one was moving for him or Mills. At no point did I want a long punt.I wanted someone to show for the ball and move into space. Maybe that what Capslock was suggesting I wanted with his editing of my post? No idea really though as he still hasn't told me.
Dougie talking absolute shit again, he needs to get a grip.
It's going to take a loot of wins to convince me now he's a good manager. As negative as BL3 is, he's right that we are way below where we should be based on talent. I just wish he'd give credit where it's due.
...

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by BL3 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:42 am

LeverEnd wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
StaffsTrotter wrote: does anyone else feel a wee bit patronised ? or do we need educating ?
The fans were shouting "Knock it forward, get it up to the big man"? WHAT?????
At the point Ream burst forward I was getting irritated that no-one was moving for him or Mills. At no point did I want a long punt.I wanted someone to show for the ball and move into space. Maybe that what Capslock was suggesting I wanted with his editing of my post? No idea really though as he still hasn't told me.
Dougie talking absolute shit again, he needs to get a grip.
It's going to take a loot of wins to convince me now he's a good manager. As negative as BL3 is, he's right that we are way below where we should be based on talent. I just wish he'd give credit where it's due.
Last edited by BL3 on Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by BL3 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:52 am

BL3 wrote:
LeverEnd wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
StaffsTrotter wrote: does anyone else feel a wee bit patronised ? or do we need educating ?
The fans were shouting "Knock it forward, get it up to the big man"? WHAT?????
At the point Ream burst forward I was getting irritated that no-one was moving for him or Mills. At no point did I want a long punt.I wanted someone to show for the ball and move into space. Maybe that what Capslock was suggesting I wanted with his editing of my post? No idea really though as he still hasn't told me.
Dougie talking absolute shit again, he needs to get a grip.
It's going to take a loot of wins to convince me now he's a good manager. As negative as BL3 is, he's right that we are way below where we should be based on talent. I just wish he'd give credit where it's due.
Credit to who? The team? We're good enough to be wiping the floor with no hopers like Millwall. Credit to the manager? Why? We're a third of the way through the season and we're 17th. That's pretty much the position we were in when he took over a year ago. We're going round in circles. We're a decent team being held back by a negative manager.

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by TKIZ! » Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:12 am

BL3 wrote:
BL3 wrote:
LeverEnd wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
StaffsTrotter wrote: does anyone else feel a wee bit patronised ? or do we need educating ?
The fans were shouting "Knock it forward, get it up to the big man"? WHAT?????
At the point Ream burst forward I was getting irritated that no-one was moving for him or Mills. At no point did I want a long punt.I wanted someone to show for the ball and move into space. Maybe that what Capslock was suggesting I wanted with his editing of my post? No idea really though as he still hasn't told me.
Dougie talking absolute shit again, he needs to get a grip.
It's going to take a loot of wins to convince me now he's a good manager. As negative as BL3 is, he's right that we are way below where we should be based on talent. I just wish he'd give credit where it's due.
Credit to who? The team? We're good enough to be wiping the floor with no hopers like Millwall. Credit to the manager? Why? We're a third of the way through the season and we're 17th. That's pretty much the position we were in when he took over a year ago. We're going round in circles. We're a decent team being held back by a negative manager.
Always the negatives, never the positives.

We won, you Big Party Pooper
Pfffft.

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by jaffka » Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:22 am

BL3, last season when we were on that long undefeated run you disappeard. We are is 7 games unbeaten, how any games will it take for you to f**k off again?

a1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:11 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by a1 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:32 am

BL3 wrote: Credit to who? The team? We're good enough to be wiping the floor with no hopers like Millwall. Credit to the manager? Why? We're a third of the way through the season and we're 17th. That's pretty much the position we were in when he took over a year ago. We're going round in circles. We're a decent team being held back by a negative manager.
Image

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by TKIZ! » Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:48 am

jaffka wrote:BL3, last season when we were on that long undefeated run you disappeard. We are is 7 games unbeaten, how any games will it take for you to f**k off again?
True that, we won and unbeaten in 7, 2 wins on the bounce. Positives
Pfffft.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by bobo the clown » Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:12 pm

TKIZ! wrote:
jaffka wrote:BL3, last season when we were on that long undefeated run you disappeard. We are is 7 games unbeaten, how any games will it take for you to f**k off again?
True that, we won and unbeaten in 7, 2 wins on the bounce. Positives
It is an improvement on results ... but that 7 is 4 draws and 3 wins. The draws include home draws v Ipswich & Sheff. Wed. That could/should have been 5 wins, 2 draws ... we'd then have 4 more points and be placed at a mighty 11th ! Our early season form was THAT bad.

So, take the positives, of course, but let's not miss the head-start we gave everyone while DF experimented .... which is what I thought the close season and pre-season was for.

I remain unimpressed by his tactical approach of worrying more about the opposition than have them worry about us and defending deep when we are very capable of attacking with strength. Even yesterday, clearly the better side, once in front we sat back and invited them onto us. It's a way to play but is neither attractive nor easy to make work successfully. At home, against weaker teams, I simply don't 'get it'.

In the end it's about results, but there were under 15,000 there yesterday and that reflects a loss of belief and enjoyment.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Dr.Karl
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:58 pm
Location: The Gun Capital/The Pastie Capital
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Dr.Karl » Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:26 pm

Didn't think it was an amazing performance, scoreline certainly flattered us. I was a big critic of Ream but he's come good. I think thats to do with our organisation as a team, he looked woeful under Coyle but then Englands Gary Cahill had ropey few months too. Probably because our defence was more exposed than it is now. Moritz looked lively when he came on but he was playing a streched game which from what I saw suits him. Would like to see him start a few home games. His finish was superb. Beckford should take note. And on that is it just me or is Beckford just infuriating to watch?
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind - Gandhi

A cynic is man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing - Wilde

I have a fax in my pocket - Gartside

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:10 pm

Dr.Karl wrote:Didn't think it was an amazing performance, scoreline certainly flattered us. I was a big critic of Ream but he's come good. I think thats to do with our organisation as a team, he looked woeful under Coyle but then Englands Gary Cahill had ropey few months too. Probably because our defence was more exposed than it is now. Moritz looked lively when he came on but he was playing a streched game which from what I saw suits him. Would like to see him start a few home games. His finish was superb. Beckford should take note. And on that is it just me or is Beckford just infuriating to watch?
I agree it wasn't an amazing performance - I don't think the scoreline flattered us. First goal went via 8 players at least (a couple of them twice in the same move). At half time, I was thinking if we went more onto the front foot, we'd have had 4/5. Beckford could've comfortably got 3 (see highlights) - the one down the South Stand where half the crowd thought it was in, and another in the second half where he rounded the keeper.

Ream. I'm not at all convinced he's a central defender - was a good ball through for Beckford's goal though (Brucie, looks like Spearing that steps away from it) - and Mills and Ream being more challenged by better teams is still fairly unproven (for me). A quick look at their goal from yesterday hardly inspires confidence - but it's a partnership that's developing and improving.

Moritz did look quite lively when he came on - I'm not sure it's Beckford beware though, Beckford's finish was good too and he isn't half as infuriating to watch as N'gog...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stp9TY65TFY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31612
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:40 pm

That Worthy-posted video, embedded.


Many a game in That Run Last Season, we brought on a third centre-back. I would agree that it might seem a touch negative at home to Millwall, but it seemed to work, just as it did at Bournemouth and at Birmingham. Maybe we should have done it at home to Ipswich and Sheffield Wednesday? Not really, but it seems to get results...

Of course, if we bring on an extra centre-back and then let a lead slip into a draw, the manager would quite understandably get pelters. As opposed to the glowing display of love he so uniformly gets at the minute.

Again, not really. It worries me when we do it, and I'd like to see us have a bit more belief in our ability to get at teams. But it does seem to be working.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:46 pm

Ta, DSB. :-)

NiceHotCuppaTea
Promising
Promising
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:20 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by NiceHotCuppaTea » Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:52 pm




mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:23 pm

Dr.Karl wrote:Didn't think it was an amazing performance, scoreline certainly flattered us. I was a big critic of Ream but he's come good. I think thats to do with our organisation as a team, he looked woeful under Coyle but then Englands Gary Cahill had ropey few months too. Probably because our defence was more exposed than it is now.
What did you make of Ream's part in their goal?

My take on Ream at centreback is that in more games than not he will have a weak moment that gives the opposition a clear goal-scoring opportunity. That's what happened yesterday, isn't it?

I'm not saying that we have a better option at the moment, incidentally.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31612
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:27 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I'm not saying that we have a better option at the moment, incidentally.
Oh but you have to, mother. This is the internets, where you have to be completely on one side or the other, and everything is as black and white as an apartheid chessboard. :?

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:54 pm

Looks as though the away fans were abusing (racist?) hall just after his goal
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 29 guests