Question about a fan takeover
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Question about a fan takeover
I have to say, if a consortium were being led by Gudni Bergsson and/or Youri Djorkaeff then I'd feel a whole lot better about it.StaffsTrotter wrote:Its all hazy recollections, but I can't ever recall Deano coming across as a really sharp, businessman type chappy. I know he may be only a frontman, but even those have to have a bit about them don't they.
Am I doing him a dis-service or just being a bit naive about the qualifications ?
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14101
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
He's just the fixer who's making the intro'sStaffsTrotter wrote:Its all hazy recollections, but I can't ever recall Deano coming across as a really sharp, businessman type chappy. I know he may be only a frontman, but even those have to have a bit about them don't they.
Am I doing him a dis-service or just being a bit naive about the qualifications ?
His company only has shareholder funds of a few grand and it's purely a 'consultancy' He'll have no part whatsoever in the takeover other than getting a commission for getting X to meet with Y
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Promising
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 1:24 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Not sure what you're saying there, do you mean there would be additional benefits to having tons of money swirling around? Quite possibly, but you'd probably need to be a self made millionaire to figure that out (or a portly accountant).Andy Waller wrote:Isn't that still far better than having it sat there being taxed?midlands exile wrote:Now if you take into account potential tax savings...:
Year Debt Interest@5% Actual_Loss Annual_Loss Corp_Tax_Saving@20% of Annual Losses
2003 £20.00 £1.00 £5.00 £6.00 £1.20
2004 £26.00 £1.30 £5.00 £6.30 £1.26
2005 £32.30 £1.62 £5.00 £6.62 £1.32
2006 £38.92 £1.95 £10.00 £11.95 £2.39
2007 £50.86 £2.54 £10.00 £12.54 £2.51
2008 £63.40 £3.17 £10.00 £13.17 £2.63
2009 £76.57 £3.83 £10.00 £13.83 £2.77
2010 £90.40 £4.52 £10.00 £14.52 £2.90
2011 £104.92 £5.25 £10.00 £15.25 £3.05
2012 £120.17 £6.01 £10.00 £16.01 £3.20
2013 £136.18 £6.81 £10.00 £16.81 £3.36
2014 £152.99 £7.65 £10.00 £17.65 £3.53
2015 £170.64 £8.53 £10.00 £18.53 £3.71
Total Interest £54.17
Total Actual Loss £135.00 (inc original £20 debt)
Total Corp Tax Saving (if owner had a group of businesses that could offset the annual losses against) £33.83
Inheritance Tax Saving (@36% of interest in overseas country, reduced rate as the owner is charitable) £19.50
Overall £27.50 net loss
Again, this is all assuming 5% interest on loans. In this instance a £30 asking price would wipe out the losses with a few quid spare for a party. This is in no way meant to reflect any actual real-life business, but is merely an example of how things might not always look as they seem.
Massive apologies for the formatting screwing up, pasting in from Excel didn't work too well.
I would assume your "losses" (ie taxes) would be a hell of a lot more than £27.50?
Thinking about my calculations earlier, I may have double counted the interest. However, if the hypothetical owner was to "write off" the best part of £140 (the final "debt" minus sale revenue), that would be worth a tidy chunk in itself. If anyone can correct me, please do.
Re: Question about a fan takeover
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/footba ... Holdsworth" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Star reporting that Amir Khan could be involved in the takeover bid.So that'll be spot on then!!!
Star reporting that Amir Khan could be involved in the takeover bid.So that'll be spot on then!!!
I feel reborn !!!! No more confussion
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32756
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
No wonder Garty's ill - that story says he's going to pay off the Club's debts.Riviman wrote:http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/footba ... Holdsworth
Star reporting that Amir Khan could be involved in the takeover bid.So that'll be spot on then!!!
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Khan will be boxing at the stadium not investing.
Don't know about anyone else but not happy with the look of this mob trying to take over, Dean Holdsworth, fcuk off!
Don't know about anyone else but not happy with the look of this mob trying to take over, Dean Holdsworth, fcuk off!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
How can you be happy or unhappy? You don't even know who they are. Holdsworth is a front man, brokering a deal. It isn't his cash.Hoboh wrote:Khan will be boxing at the stadium not investing.
Don't know about anyone else but not happy with the look of this mob trying to take over, Dean Holdsworth, fcuk off!
Though from the sounds of it, there isn't any real money so doubt it will happen!
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Question about a fan takeover
So you'd be happy just to let things follow on in their current direction would you, Hoboh?Hoboh wrote:Khan will be boxing at the stadium not investing.
Don't know about anyone else but not happy with the look of this mob trying to take over, Dean Holdsworth, fcuk off!
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
I personally don't care who's behind the new Holdsworth led investors I'm 100% behind it - whoever is or are the major investor or investors won't be doing so to waste their money, they will have both a short and long term plan / strategy of some sort and will want to see the club improve and the value of the club improve and will therefore have to provide more funding in the playing squad that ED currently is.
ED has pulled the plug and is putting nothing else in, so whoever it is must be seen as an improvement because unless we get new owners asap we will continue to drop like a stone.
And for the record I wouldn't mind Dean Holdsworth as chairman
ED has pulled the plug and is putting nothing else in, so whoever it is must be seen as an improvement because unless we get new owners asap we will continue to drop like a stone.
And for the record I wouldn't mind Dean Holdsworth as chairman
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9288
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Venkys...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Bizarre statement. You don't care who is behind it? What if they have no cash? Or are asset strippers? Or are mentalists who want to call us "little Man Utd" and make us play in red.Peter Thompson wrote:I personally don't care who's behind the new Holdsworth led investors I'm 100% behind it - whoever is or are the major investor or investors won't be doing so to waste their money, they will have both a short and long term plan / strategy of some sort and will want to see the club improve and the value of the club improve and will therefore have to provide more funding in the playing squad that ED currently is.
ED has pulled the plug and is putting nothing else in, so whoever it is must be seen as an improvement because unless we get new owners asap we will continue to drop like a stone.
And for the record I wouldn't mind Dean Holdsworth as chairman
Of course it matters. It is as odd as Hoboh proclaiming he doesn't like the sound of a group of people we don't even know exist, let alone anything about.
Holdsworth is just a broker. He isn't likely bringing anything else to the table.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
BWFCI its my opinion - so get off your fcuking high horse once in your life...
My point is that if we continue with the current strategy / ownership - i.e. dropping like a stone without a pot to piss in we will be relegated and continue to drop season after season (in my opinion) - therefore whichever investor or investors ED feels comfortable in selling the club to will do for me and I repeat means that it doesn't matter who they are.
I also never said anything about Holdsworth apart from that I'd be ok with him being chairman.
My point is that if we continue with the current strategy / ownership - i.e. dropping like a stone without a pot to piss in we will be relegated and continue to drop season after season (in my opinion) - therefore whichever investor or investors ED feels comfortable in selling the club to will do for me and I repeat means that it doesn't matter who they are.
I also never said anything about Holdsworth apart from that I'd be ok with him being chairman.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
But you do care then. Because by default you're asking for someone who can provide investment in the team. And there is no certainty any new owner will be able to do that. That was my point, simply that of course you care.Peter Thompson wrote:BWFCI its my opinion - so get off your fcuking high horse once in your life...
My point is that if we continue with the current strategy / ownership - i.e. dropping like a stone without a pot to piss in we will be relegated and continue to drop season after season (in my opinion) - therefore whichever investor or investors ED feels comfortable in selling the club to will do for me and I repeat means that it doesn't matter who they are.
I also never said anything about Holdsworth apart from that I'd be ok with him being chairman.
Things are bad right now of that there is no doubt. And if your point is so long as a new owner makes them better you don't care and I'd agree there. But as we've seen with plenty of other clubs takeovers often make things even worse.
Re: Question about a fan takeover
For once, I really have no idea.Bruce Rioja wrote:So you'd be happy just to let things follow on in their current direction would you, Hoboh?Hoboh wrote:Khan will be boxing at the stadium not investing.
Don't know about anyone else but not happy with the look of this mob trying to take over, Dean Holdsworth, fcuk off!
I fail to see how the club in its current plight would be attractive to anyone, personally if I was a billionaire not needing any money I'd at least want the club trading around 'break even' with some modicum of on field success and both look a pipedream.
I really don't know, the one dream I always have had was to watch the whites win the FA cup at Wembley in my life time, I doubt it ever will happen.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
See I am sadly in agreement here. Looking at the information we have, it will take a small fortune of anyone's money to lift us back to competing for the riches of the top flight.Hoboh wrote:For once, I really have no idea.Bruce Rioja wrote:So you'd be happy just to let things follow on in their current direction would you, Hoboh?Hoboh wrote:Khan will be boxing at the stadium not investing.
Don't know about anyone else but not happy with the look of this mob trying to take over, Dean Holdsworth, fcuk off!
I fail to see how the club in its current plight would be attractive to anyone, personally if I was a billionaire not needing any money I'd at least want the club trading around 'break even' with some modicum of on field success and both look a pipedream.
I really don't know, the one dream I always have had was to watch the whites win the FA cup at Wembley in my life time, I doubt it ever will happen.
Barring a Bolton fan with hundreds of millions to chuck in (and plenty to go spare too), I'm struggling to see how we are attractive to any owner right now. The asking price for the club is bound to be going down all the time which surely means any smart investor will just wait it out and buy as cheaply as possible.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Question about a fan takeover
So, the way I'm reading this is that our once proud town club is slowly dying a death weekly, broke and friendless, the chairman has had a stroke and the owner (who some might be forgetting has poured a shed load of his own money in to try and save us) is at a point when he cannot feasibly put any more funds in. Enter, talk of a consotium coming in with a view to saving the club's live....and we can afford to be picking and choosing what we want or dont? Get real folks (some).
Is that it? See, as a kid, I used to go round shop windows at Christmas time choosing all the things I wanted (fully aware I wasn't going to get them) but so glad and grateful that on the morn I would be getting something at least. If Count Dracula, Victor Frankenstein, Doctor Jekkyl and Mr Hyde stepped up and saved Bolton Wanderers I sure wouldn't be asking for their C.V's. Bring em on, what do we really have to lose?
Is that it? See, as a kid, I used to go round shop windows at Christmas time choosing all the things I wanted (fully aware I wasn't going to get them) but so glad and grateful that on the morn I would be getting something at least. If Count Dracula, Victor Frankenstein, Doctor Jekkyl and Mr Hyde stepped up and saved Bolton Wanderers I sure wouldn't be asking for their C.V's. Bring em on, what do we really have to lose?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: Question about a fan takeover
I reckon it's a secret kabal of terrorist rufugee asylum-seekers trying to come over here and steal our game... they'll make all the men play in burkhas... be vigilant!Bruce Rioja wrote:So you'd be happy just to let things follow on in their current direction would you, Hoboh?Hoboh wrote:Khan will be boxing at the stadium not investing.
Don't know about anyone else but not happy with the look of this mob trying to take over, Dean Holdsworth, fcuk off!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
It isn't about being picky or choosy. Just that a new buyer, could potentially dissolve the club and build a supermarket. Or they could send us into administration or sell off the assets or a whole list of things.TANGODANCER wrote:So, the way I'm reading this is that our once proud town club is slowly dying a death weekly, broke and friendless, the chairman has had a stroke and the owner (who some might be forgetting has poured a shed load of his own money in to try and save us) is at a point when he cannot feasibly put any more funds in. Enter, talk of a consotium coming in with a view to saving the club's live....and we can afford to be picking and choosing what we want or dont? Get real folks (some).
Is that it? See, as a kid, I used to go round shop windows at Christmas time choosing all the things I wanted (fully aware I wasn't going to get them) but so glad and grateful that on the morn I would be getting something at least. If Count Dracula, Victor Frankenstein, Doctor Jekkyl and Mr Hyde stepped up and saved Bolton Wanderers I sure wouldn't be asking for their C.V's. Bring em on, what do we really have to lose?
The idea that any new buyer will automatically be better than the admittedly current dire situation isn't accurate.
We need fresh money and a safe pair of hands and must hope that is what we get. But looking around the various clubs, it shows that isn't always the case with takeovers and we saying "anyone would be better than how it is now" isn't accurate.
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Aye, Venkys, Carson Yeung, Vincent Tan (yes he got them promoted, but was that worth playing in red? and now he's stopped), anyone who has owned Leeds in the last 15 years, Blackpool. Plenty to go wrong.
Also, I'm not sure there is any evidence ED can't feasibly put any more in. As folk have pointed out, it's unlikely he got to that first 100m and thought, "that's me folks". What is clear is that he's decided he isn't. Which he's entitled to do, but I think folk are also entitled to say, "Cheers for the good times, but this horror-show also happened on your watch, so we'd appreciate it if you fixed that before you went". Hopefully appointing Birch is the first big step in doing that. It's clear that ED has wanted to sell for ages, but to the right buyer. Now it's clear he's desperate to sell, hopefully he still makes sure it's someone proper.
Also, I'm not sure there is any evidence ED can't feasibly put any more in. As folk have pointed out, it's unlikely he got to that first 100m and thought, "that's me folks". What is clear is that he's decided he isn't. Which he's entitled to do, but I think folk are also entitled to say, "Cheers for the good times, but this horror-show also happened on your watch, so we'd appreciate it if you fixed that before you went". Hopefully appointing Birch is the first big step in doing that. It's clear that ED has wanted to sell for ages, but to the right buyer. Now it's clear he's desperate to sell, hopefully he still makes sure it's someone proper.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28832
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Question about a fan takeover
We have to do due diligence. And for those who would say anything is better than the incumbent, some names:
Craig Whyte
George Reynolds
John Batchelor
Alex Hamilton
Stuart Lovering
Ken Richardson
Plenty more under that last link, too
Craig Whyte
George Reynolds
John Batchelor
Alex Hamilton
Stuart Lovering
Ken Richardson
Plenty more under that last link, too
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], knobpolisher, Majestic-12 [Bot], officer_dibble and 193 guests