Time to go
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Time to go
Ever read a positive Megson post from mejaffka wrote:feel guilty?

- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Time to go
It's more people who are happy for Coyle to take the club out of existence rather than admit he's a dud that are annoying. No more excuses!jaffka wrote:am fecked off that we seem to be doomed, injuries and sending off's, maybe the tactics are off as well
what really gets me are that some inane who seem to be wanting to point score because of their support of the previouse manager
Nobody wanted Coyle or any Bolton manager to succeed more than I do.
But the statistics speak for themselves and can't keep using excuses of injuries, fixture lists or under performing players. Buck stops with Coyle.
For me he's the next Cokin Todd, nice enough bloke, but lacks the nasty side and tactical nous to sort out the problems when they arrive!
Re: Time to go
I really cannot remember any of your optimistic posts recentley but can remember many under Mugson.BWFC_Insane wrote:It's more people who are happy for Coyle to take the club out of existence rather than admit he's a dud that are annoying. No more excuses!jaffka wrote:am fecked off that we seem to be doomed, injuries and sending off's, maybe the tactics are off as well
what really gets me are that some inane who seem to be wanting to point score because of their support of the previouse manager
But the statistics speak for themselves and can't keep using excuses of injuries, fixture lists or under performing players. Buck stops with Coyle.Nobody wanted Coyle or any Bolton manager to succeed more than I do.
For me he's the next Cokin Todd, nice enough bloke, but lacks the nasty side and tactical nous to sort out the problems when they arrive!
I really hope that you are not point scoring.
Re: Time to go
Seeing I have clean hands in this, lets stick to basics, he ain't up to it
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Time to go
What has there been to be positive about?jaffka wrote:I really cannot remember any of your optimistic posts recentley but can remember many under Mugson.BWFC_Insane wrote:It's more people who are happy for Coyle to take the club out of existence rather than admit he's a dud that are annoying. No more excuses!jaffka wrote:am fecked off that we seem to be doomed, injuries and sending off's, maybe the tactics are off as well
what really gets me are that some inane who seem to be wanting to point score because of their support of the previouse manager
But the statistics speak for themselves and can't keep using excuses of injuries, fixture lists or under performing players. Buck stops with Coyle.Nobody wanted Coyle or any Bolton manager to succeed more than I do.
For me he's the next Cokin Todd, nice enough bloke, but lacks the nasty side and tactical nous to sort out the problems when they arrive!
I really hope that you are not point scoring.
When we were in the bottom three with a PPG under Megson I said it was time for him to go. Saying the same now!
That's consistent!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Time to go
YepCAPSLOCK wrote:Its not just them two missing, its the loss of Elmamder and Sturridge, plus the tactically naive Coyle (and his Burnley chums) and the non-selection of Muamba
Businesswoman of the year.
Re: Time to go
Errrr there were times those of us that kept the faith thought you was Megson! (and there's still a little rumour)
I think all your seeing BWFCI the same as all of us (even the romantic types deep down) the job ain't working for Coyle there are a lot frit of what would follow his departure if he stays too long.
I think all your seeing BWFCI the same as all of us (even the romantic types deep down) the job ain't working for Coyle there are a lot frit of what would follow his departure if he stays too long.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Time to go
Well you shouldn't have shoved inCrazyHorse wrote:At times you though I was Megson? Fookin Nora.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Time to go
What eva appens now, lets not forget thay Coyle has inherited his failing team.
Re: Time to go
jaffka wrote:What eva appens now, lets not forget thay Coyle has inherited his failing team.

Re: Time to go
Hoboh wrote:jaffka wrote:What eva appens now, lets not forget thay Coyle has inherited his failing team.

Re: Time to go
A team that was so bad it was 6th in the League and in the SF of the FA Cupjaffka wrote:What eva appens now, lets not forget thay Coyle has inherited his failing team.
I can't see how anybody can link the sorry demise since last March, to Gary Megson
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Time to go
want megson back?
Re: Time to go
I want Coyle to get his head from up his arse
Cos, as it stands, theres every chance we'll lose to Megsons team next season
Cos, as it stands, theres every chance we'll lose to Megsons team next season
Sto ut Serviam
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Time to go
It's not about going back to Megson, it's about going forwards from where we are.
Where we are is worse over a significant run of games since the day to forget, than we were under the previous manager, ever, over the same number of games, who got sacked.
I didn't want Megson here, but acknowledged the improvements in his second season, I was happy with the appointment of Coyle when it all went pear shaped in his third season.
Being a decent bloke and an ex-Bolton player, has bought him more time than most previous managers got. LSL got 10 games.
People who can't see that this is worse than both LSL and Megson, are just not looking carefully enough.
Same standards should apply to ex-Bolton players.
If it isn't good enough (and it's not), then they have to go.
Where we are is worse over a significant run of games since the day to forget, than we were under the previous manager, ever, over the same number of games, who got sacked.
I didn't want Megson here, but acknowledged the improvements in his second season, I was happy with the appointment of Coyle when it all went pear shaped in his third season.
Being a decent bloke and an ex-Bolton player, has bought him more time than most previous managers got. LSL got 10 games.
People who can't see that this is worse than both LSL and Megson, are just not looking carefully enough.
Same standards should apply to ex-Bolton players.
If it isn't good enough (and it's not), then they have to go.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1967
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: Time to go
How about Phil Brown? Is he in work?
2 out of 10 is the worst start since 1902 according to the BeN. Might all seem better in the morning!
2 out of 10 is the worst start since 1902 according to the BeN. Might all seem better in the morning!
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Time to go
It won't.Armchair Wanderer wrote:Might all seem better in the morning!
Businesswoman of the year.
Re: Time to go
fück.
just get hughes in (for however long he wants ,12 months ?, yeah, ok) and give him 30 million. we'll be ok in 8 weeks time.
just get hughes in (for however long he wants ,12 months ?, yeah, ok) and give him 30 million. we'll be ok in 8 weeks time.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests