Time to go

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Should we get rid of Owen Coyle?

Yes
56
38%
No
70
48%
Maybe
20
14%
 
Total votes: 146

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13654
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Time to go

Post by Hoboh » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:11 pm

jaffka wrote:feel guilty?
Ever read a positive Megson post from me :mrgreen:

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38813
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:12 pm

jaffka wrote:am fecked off that we seem to be doomed, injuries and sending off's, maybe the tactics are off as well

what really gets me are that some inane who seem to be wanting to point score because of their support of the previouse manager
It's more people who are happy for Coyle to take the club out of existence rather than admit he's a dud that are annoying. No more excuses!

Nobody wanted Coyle or any Bolton manager to succeed more than I do.

But the statistics speak for themselves and can't keep using excuses of injuries, fixture lists or under performing players. Buck stops with Coyle.

For me he's the next Cokin Todd, nice enough bloke, but lacks the nasty side and tactical nous to sort out the problems when they arrive!

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Time to go

Post by jaffka » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:23 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
jaffka wrote:am fecked off that we seem to be doomed, injuries and sending off's, maybe the tactics are off as well

what really gets me are that some inane who seem to be wanting to point score because of their support of the previouse manager
It's more people who are happy for Coyle to take the club out of existence rather than admit he's a dud that are annoying. No more excuses!
Nobody wanted Coyle or any Bolton manager to succeed more than I do.
But the statistics speak for themselves and can't keep using excuses of injuries, fixture lists or under performing players. Buck stops with Coyle.

For me he's the next Cokin Todd, nice enough bloke, but lacks the nasty side and tactical nous to sort out the problems when they arrive!
I really cannot remember any of your optimistic posts recentley but can remember many under Mugson.

I really hope that you are not point scoring.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13654
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Time to go

Post by Hoboh » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:27 pm

Seeing I have clean hands in this, lets stick to basics, he ain't up to it

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38813
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:35 pm

jaffka wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
jaffka wrote:am fecked off that we seem to be doomed, injuries and sending off's, maybe the tactics are off as well

what really gets me are that some inane who seem to be wanting to point score because of their support of the previouse manager
It's more people who are happy for Coyle to take the club out of existence rather than admit he's a dud that are annoying. No more excuses!
Nobody wanted Coyle or any Bolton manager to succeed more than I do.
But the statistics speak for themselves and can't keep using excuses of injuries, fixture lists or under performing players. Buck stops with Coyle.

For me he's the next Cokin Todd, nice enough bloke, but lacks the nasty side and tactical nous to sort out the problems when they arrive!
I really cannot remember any of your optimistic posts recentley but can remember many under Mugson.

I really hope that you are not point scoring.
What has there been to be positive about?

When we were in the bottom three with a PPG under Megson I said it was time for him to go. Saying the same now!

That's consistent!

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Re: Time to go

Post by CrazyHorse » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:42 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:Its not just them two missing, its the loss of Elmamder and Sturridge, plus the tactically naive Coyle (and his Burnley chums) and the non-selection of Muamba
Yep
Businesswoman of the year.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13654
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Time to go

Post by Hoboh » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:43 pm

Errrr there were times those of us that kept the faith thought you was Megson! (and there's still a little rumour)

I think all your seeing BWFCI the same as all of us (even the romantic types deep down) the job ain't working for Coyle there are a lot frit of what would follow his departure if he stays too long.

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Re: Time to go

Post by CrazyHorse » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:44 pm

At times you though I was Megson? Fookin Nora.
Businesswoman of the year.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13654
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Time to go

Post by Hoboh » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:45 pm

CrazyHorse wrote:At times you though I was Megson? Fookin Nora.
Well you shouldn't have shoved in

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Re: Time to go

Post by CrazyHorse » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:47 pm

:mrgreen:
I mean I like an insult, but Meggo? kinnel.
Businesswoman of the year.

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Time to go

Post by jaffka » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:49 pm

What eva appens now, lets not forget thay Coyle has inherited his failing team.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13654
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Time to go

Post by Hoboh » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:50 pm

jaffka wrote:What eva appens now, lets not forget thay Coyle has inherited his failing team.

:lmfao:

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Time to go

Post by jaffka » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:53 pm

Hoboh wrote:
jaffka wrote:What eva appens now, lets not forget thay Coyle has inherited his failing team.

:lmfao:
:crazy:

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Time to go

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:59 pm

jaffka wrote:What eva appens now, lets not forget thay Coyle has inherited his failing team.
A team that was so bad it was 6th in the League and in the SF of the FA Cup

I can't see how anybody can link the sorry demise since last March, to Gary Megson
Sto ut Serviam

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Time to go

Post by jaffka » Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:07 am

want megson back?

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Time to go

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:35 am

I want Coyle to get his head from up his arse

Cos, as it stands, theres every chance we'll lose to Megsons team next season
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:43 am

It's not about going back to Megson, it's about going forwards from where we are.

Where we are is worse over a significant run of games since the day to forget, than we were under the previous manager, ever, over the same number of games, who got sacked.

I didn't want Megson here, but acknowledged the improvements in his second season, I was happy with the appointment of Coyle when it all went pear shaped in his third season.

Being a decent bloke and an ex-Bolton player, has bought him more time than most previous managers got. LSL got 10 games.

People who can't see that this is worse than both LSL and Megson, are just not looking carefully enough.

Same standards should apply to ex-Bolton players.

If it isn't good enough (and it's not), then they have to go.

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Time to go

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:55 am

How about Phil Brown? Is he in work?

2 out of 10 is the worst start since 1902 according to the BeN. Might all seem better in the morning!
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Re: Time to go

Post by CrazyHorse » Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:03 am

Armchair Wanderer wrote:Might all seem better in the morning!
It won't.
Businesswoman of the year.

a1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:11 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by a1 » Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:29 am

fück.

just get hughes in (for however long he wants ,12 months ?, yeah, ok) and give him 30 million. we'll be ok in 8 weeks time.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests