Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Our corners no-one forward. Their corners 1 forward with 2 bombing up the wings when they clear. That's why number 2 went in today.
WE have defended so well up to 80 mins but there in lies the problem we've had to defend. We've had no way to get the ball forward in the second half and only really looked like going for it when we had to. The backs to the wall mentality was nice to see from the defenders but when did we make the decision to start having 11 defenders on the pitch as opposed to a seasoned 4-4-2/4-3-3 formation?
We're setting records for home defeats at the minute and its not good. Next up is Stoke City who will arguably start lauding the cup result over us. I hope we end up giving them a right good game and put the memories of Wembley to bed.
WE have defended so well up to 80 mins but there in lies the problem we've had to defend. We've had no way to get the ball forward in the second half and only really looked like going for it when we had to. The backs to the wall mentality was nice to see from the defenders but when did we make the decision to start having 11 defenders on the pitch as opposed to a seasoned 4-4-2/4-3-3 formation?
We're setting records for home defeats at the minute and its not good. Next up is Stoke City who will arguably start lauding the cup result over us. I hope we end up giving them a right good game and put the memories of Wembley to bed.
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
I sincerely doubt itMar wrote:Our corners no-one forward. Their corners 1 forward with 2 bombing up the wings when they clear. That's why number 2 went in today.
WE have defended so well up to 80 mins but there in lies the problem we've had to defend. We've had no way to get the ball forward in the second half and only really looked like going for it when we had to. The backs to the wall mentality was nice to see from the defenders but when did we make the decision to start having 11 defenders on the pitch as opposed to a seasoned 4-4-2/4-3-3 formation?
We're setting records for home defeats at the minute and its not good. Next up is Stoke City who will arguably start lauding the cup result over us. I hope we end up giving them a right good game and put the memories of Wembley to bed.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
we really are shit. we know Wigan are worse, just hope there are two more!
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:14 am
- Location: Las Vegas, USA
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
feck that. We didn't deserve to lose.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Some positives...
Jussi throwing it out more.
Knight replaced by Wheater and Wheater doing well.
Kakuta came on.
Some negatives...
Too many shots from crazy parts of the field...
Therefore, not getting the ball into dangerous positions enough...
Which lead to Sunderland piling forward due to us not looking dangerous.
Too many anonymous players.
Jussi throwing it out more.
Knight replaced by Wheater and Wheater doing well.
Kakuta came on.
Some negatives...
Too many shots from crazy parts of the field...
Therefore, not getting the ball into dangerous positions enough...
Which lead to Sunderland piling forward due to us not looking dangerous.
Too many anonymous players.
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Another positive...
..Paul Robinson
(dont shoot me!)
..Paul Robinson
(dont shoot me!)
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:23 pm
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Can't see anything on the horizon but the Championship. There's no balance to the side & we've got a naive romantic in charge. Last 20 league games do not lie.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Whiich game have you watched ?? Sunderland were miles better than us. desperate defending at times kept the score down to2.martin1877coywm wrote:feck that. We didn't deserve to lose.
2nd half they dominated. We never looked like winning that match .
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
The Delusional mackems!!
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
You think you are a big club...
You think that Manchester United give a shit about you....
You thought you would beat us....
You didnt deserve to lose today....
You dont think you are going down.....
And you call us DELUDED!
Absolutely love playing against you.
I'll miss you next season!
You think that Manchester United give a shit about you....
You thought you would beat us....
You didnt deserve to lose today....
You dont think you are going down.....
And you call us DELUDED!
Absolutely love playing against you.
I'll miss you next season!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
feck off you fecking geordie wannabe.
Utter fecking shite that today.
Utter fecking shite that today.
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Billy big bollocks mackems saving their posts for after the game. Brave.
Last edited by HMX on Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
"feck off you fecking geordie wannabe.
Utter fecking shite that today."
Knobhead!
Utter fecking shite that today."
Knobhead!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: North London, originally Farnworth
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Ha ha. You waited until you had the three points safe before coming to post. Typical ballsy Mackem. Now be a good little boy and run off home to your sister, but give us a tune on your banjo first.
Don't try to be a great man. Just be a man and let history make up its own mind.
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Whats that sound...............
its about 17,500 dummies being spat out.
Wish we were a "big club" like you.
its about 17,500 dummies being spat out.
Wish we were a "big club" like you.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:38 pm
- Location: Corby
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
We did deserve to lose based on our second half performance. And we've never thought we were a big club.Wearsider wrote:You think you are a big club...
You think that Manchester United give a shit about you....
You thought you would beat us....
You didnt deserve to lose today....
You dont think you are going down.....
And you call us DELUDED!
Absolutely love playing against you.
I'll miss you next season!
Plus you think that one win today and that's it, you've stayed up, congratulations, i suppose the next 29 games don't matter then do they?
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
"Ha ha. You waited until you had the three points safe before coming to post. Typical ballsy Mackem. Now be a good little boy and run off home to your sister, but give us a tune on your banjo first. "
Amazingly enough, i was watching the game.....
And thanks to you being totally shite, i really enjoyed it.
Cheers!
Amazingly enough, i was watching the game.....
And thanks to you being totally shite, i really enjoyed it.
Cheers!
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:38 pm
- Location: Corby
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
You weren't watching the game before 3pm though were you?Wearsider wrote:"Ha ha. You waited until you had the three points safe before coming to post. Typical ballsy Mackem. Now be a good little boy and run off home to your sister, but give us a tune on your banjo first. "
Amazingly enough, i was watching the game.....
And thanks to you being totally shite, i really enjoyed it.
Cheers!
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
That would have been quite a feat.
You are typical of the clowns that follow your joke of a club.
You are typical of the clowns that follow your joke of a club.
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Wearsider wrote:That would have been quite a feat.
You are typical of the clowns that follow your joke of a club.
sorry what club do you support again
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: knobpolisher and 162 guests