Freedman out!
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Freedman out!
It is a real post by a Wigan fan. It just echoes SF's rhetoric when we were on our winning run under Freedman at the end of last season is all.....bobo the clown wrote:Is that for real ?BWFC_Insane wrote:Meanwhile....over on the Wigan forum SF is also posting....
Another win
...but we were once again dire, same v Forest (second half)and same v Ipswich. Well done lads but I believe the manager is clueless. Set pieces on the whole were woeful, very one dimensional and virtually nothing in the final third apart from set pieces. We got out of jail again, but I feel our luck is slowly going to start to run out!
SF on the Wigan site. Talking as if a Wigan fan. Criticising Coyle. Warning of doom to come.
Shirley not ??
Mind given their squad Wigan are nowhere near where they should be, but that is certainly not a debate worth starting here.
Re: Freedman out!
As a lurker rather than a poster, this forum would be a more enjoyable read if the word 'Coyle' was banned. He's gone, it's history, he's not coming back.
Freedman doesn't have to be better than Coyle he has to be better than all the other managers in this league (one of which is inconveniently Coyle). Personally I'm more concerned about what happens in the future than endlessly replaying the recent past.
And all of 'em are worse than Megson..................................
Freedman doesn't have to be better than Coyle he has to be better than all the other managers in this league (one of which is inconveniently Coyle). Personally I'm more concerned about what happens in the future than endlessly replaying the recent past.
And all of 'em are worse than Megson..................................
Re: Freedman out!
For somebody telling others what to post about, it might be better if you posted something accuratemrplow wrote:Freedman doesn't have to be better than Coyle he has to be better than all the other managers in this league
I'll give you the bit in bold but the rest is nonsense
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Freedman out!
Why ?CAPSLOCK wrote:For somebody telling others what to post about, it might be better if you posted something accuratemrplow wrote:Freedman doesn't have to be better than Coyle he has to be better than all the other managers in this league
I'll give you the bit in bold but the rest is nonsense
Re: Freedman out!
Well, it depends how you define better
If you mean he has to get more points, that's not even true as it doesn't matter if we get promoted having been 1st, 2nd or 6th
And (using SF's logic) points isn't even a reasonable measure of a managers 'goodness'
Moyes won manager of the year while finishing half a dozen places and 20 points behind Ferguson - does that mean Moyes was 'better' than Ferguson that year?
My view
Freedman HAS to meet the targets set by his employer, not by the fans
Nobody (on here) actually knows what those targets are but I'd be happy if a couple were something like
1 professionalise the senior side of the football club - not just the first team - working alongside the Academy Director to develop/procure young talent from within and without
2 to achieve promotion within 3 years (from now) having integrated 2 or 3 of our own junior players
If you mean he has to get more points, that's not even true as it doesn't matter if we get promoted having been 1st, 2nd or 6th
And (using SF's logic) points isn't even a reasonable measure of a managers 'goodness'
Moyes won manager of the year while finishing half a dozen places and 20 points behind Ferguson - does that mean Moyes was 'better' than Ferguson that year?
My view
Freedman HAS to meet the targets set by his employer, not by the fans
Nobody (on here) actually knows what those targets are but I'd be happy if a couple were something like
1 professionalise the senior side of the football club - not just the first team - working alongside the Academy Director to develop/procure young talent from within and without
2 to achieve promotion within 3 years (from now) having integrated 2 or 3 of our own junior players
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Freedman out!
It's moments like this make it all worth while.CAPSLOCK wrote:My view
Freedman HAS to meet the targets set by his employer, not by the fans
Nobody (on here) actually knows what those targets are but I'd be happy if a couple were something like
1 professionalise the senior side of the football club - not just the first team - working alongside the Academy Director to develop/procure young talent from within and without
2 to achieve promotion within 3 years (from now) having integrated 2 or 3 of our own junior players
Re: Freedman out!
Ok. I meant better as in competing with and then finishing above, which as you say could mean top 6 and a good day out at wembley might be enough. Could have worded it more clearly.CAPSLOCK wrote:Well, it depends how you define better
If you mean he has to get more points, that's not even true as it doesn't matter if we get promoted having been 1st, 2nd or 6th
And (using SF's logic) points isn't even a reasonable measure of a managers 'goodness'
Moyes won manager of the year while finishing half a dozen places and 20 points behind Ferguson - does that mean Moyes was 'better' than Ferguson that year?
My view
Freedman HAS to meet the targets set by his employer, not by the fans
Nobody (on here) actually knows what those targets are but I'd be happy if a couple were something like
1 professionalise the senior side of the football club - not just the first team - working alongside the Academy Director to develop/procure young talent from within and without
2 to achieve promotion within 3 years (from now) having integrated 2 or 3 of our own junior players
I tend to agree on the longer term goals, I think we need to follow the path of a few other clubs who have dropped out of the PL and taken a few years to rebuild.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Freedman out!
My gut feeling is that is roughly the targets he will be working towards.CAPSLOCK wrote:Well, it depends how you define better
If you mean he has to get more points, that's not even true as it doesn't matter if we get promoted having been 1st, 2nd or 6th
And (using SF's logic) points isn't even a reasonable measure of a managers 'goodness'
Moyes won manager of the year while finishing half a dozen places and 20 points behind Ferguson - does that mean Moyes was 'better' than Ferguson that year?
My view
Freedman HAS to meet the targets set by his employer, not by the fans
Nobody (on here) actually knows what those targets are but I'd be happy if a couple were something like
1 professionalise the senior side of the football club - not just the first team - working alongside the Academy Director to develop/procure young talent from within and without
2 to achieve promotion within 3 years (from now) having integrated 2 or 3 of our own junior players
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Freedman out!
Course you'd think that. It suits your agenda.
worryingly though, he doesn't seem to trust any of our academy players to come in and make an impact. He said as much, when answering my question at the fans forum
worryingly though, he doesn't seem to trust any of our academy players to come in and make an impact. He said as much, when answering my question at the fans forum
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Freedman out!
Its a message board about football not a fecking international conspiracy.boltonboris wrote:Course you'd think that. It suits your agenda.
worryingly though, he doesn't seem to trust any of our academy players to come in and make an impact. He said as much, when answering my question at the fans forum
I think it, because it fits with what I've seen and heard, and what has happened.
That doesn't mean it is right. But it is what I think.
Re: Freedman out!
I wonder why that is - maybe theyre not good enough, yetboltonboris wrote:Course you'd think that. It suits your agenda.
worryingly though, he doesn't seem to trust any of our academy players to come in and make an impact. He said as much, when answering my question at the fans forum

Kellet made the bench at Brighton
Odelusi has had a run round
Sto ut Serviam
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31611
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Freedman out!
Oh, quite so - which is sort of what I'm saying. Same happened with Coyle v Megson, for a toenail-wrenchingly long time. I s'pose it's the binary nature of the internet: something is either the best thing ever or the worst thing ever; further, its direct comparison has to be the opposite. I have opinions on Coyle but they inform rather than affect my opinions on Freedman, who could be doing a whole lot better than he is but still has my confidence - although it was waning worryingly a fortnight ago. Even had I lost faith in Freedman, it's still a leap from there to wanting sackings and tumult. We can't go through that brouhaha every autumn, it's an unsustainable model so long as football grants multi-year contracts to multi-million-pound assets who are inevitably humanly fallible.mrplow wrote:As a lurker rather than a poster, this forum would be a more enjoyable read if the word 'Coyle' was banned. He's gone, it's history, he's not coming back.
Cheers. Grammar costs nothing, and is, as has been noted, the difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're shit...Sponge wrote:I think I'm developing a man-crush on DSB: eloquent, reasonable, funny, knows how to use a comma... *swoon*
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Freedman out!
I'm not counting the cups to be honest, and it wasn't a criticism of him either, it was merely an observation..CAPSLOCK wrote:I wonder why that is - maybe theyre not good enough, yetboltonboris wrote:Course you'd think that. It suits your agenda.
worryingly though, he doesn't seem to trust any of our academy players to come in and make an impact. He said as much, when answering my question at the fans forum![]()
Kellet made the bench at Brighton
Odelusi has had a run round
If they're not good enough, he's right not to play them, but I'm not sure that bringing academy players through to the first team is one of his KPI's. If it is, which it probably shouldn't be at this stage, he's failing at it.
But again, not his fault. Yet.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Freedman out!
It may well be a longer term objective. It is something he has certainly stressed so I would be stunned if it wasn't.boltonboris wrote:I'm not counting the cups to be honest, and it wasn't a criticism of him either, it was merely an observation..CAPSLOCK wrote:I wonder why that is - maybe theyre not good enough, yetboltonboris wrote:Course you'd think that. It suits your agenda.
worryingly though, he doesn't seem to trust any of our academy players to come in and make an impact. He said as much, when answering my question at the fans forum![]()
Kellet made the bench at Brighton
Odelusi has had a run round
If they're not good enough, he's right not to play them, but I'm not sure that bringing academy players through to the first team is one of his KPI's. If it is, which it probably shouldn't be at this stage, he's failing at it.
But again, not his fault. Yet.
Personally I think there is a longer term plan in place and that Eddie will take short term success if it comes along but won't chase it if it doesn't happen.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Freedman out!
Eddie may not be the one making those decisions once the redevelopment goes ahead
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Freedman out!
Unless someone stumps up £150m for the club or Eddie were to pass away then he's making the decisions for the foreseeable futureboltonboris wrote:Eddie may not be the one making those decisions once the redevelopment goes ahead
Pfffft.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Freedman out!
You just never know what's around the corner.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Freedman out!
Not a prayer man, I'd offer him 25 and a 75% payback of the debt that would mean his money back. He's had his cash cow interest payments for long enough and made a killing.TKIZ! wrote:Unless someone stumps up £150m for the club or Eddie were to pass away then he's making the decisions for the foreseeable futureboltonboris wrote:Eddie may not be the one making those decisions once the redevelopment goes ahead
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Freedman out!
Of course we don't know if Eddie has received a penny.Hoboh wrote:Not a prayer man, I'd offer him 25 and a 75% payback of the debt that would mean his money back. He's had his cash cow interest payments for long enough and made a killing.TKIZ! wrote:Unless someone stumps up £150m for the club or Eddie were to pass away then he's making the decisions for the foreseeable futureboltonboris wrote:Eddie may not be the one making those decisions once the redevelopment goes ahead
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Freedman out!
Of course we don't know if Eddie has received a penny or not.Hoboh wrote:Not a prayer man, I'd offer him 25 and a 75% payback of the debt that would mean his money back. He's had his cash cow interest payments for long enough and made a killing.TKIZ! wrote:Unless someone stumps up £150m for the club or Eddie were to pass away then he's making the decisions for the foreseeable futureboltonboris wrote:Eddie may not be the one making those decisions once the redevelopment goes ahead
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], The_Gun and 50 guests