No Jackett required?

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
bedwetter2
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 859
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:16 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by bedwetter2 » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:01 pm

Sounded like a good performance from the white men. Thanks for the commentary Tango.

Well, I suspect we shall be moving further up the league over the next month ready to launch our assault on the summit. Ice axe and crampons at the ready.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:02 pm

bedwetter2 wrote:Sounded like a good performance from the white men. Thanks for the commentary Tango.

Well, I suspect we shall be moving further up the league over the next month ready to launch our assault on the summit. Ice axe and tampons at the ready.
:shock:

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:03 pm

throwawayboltonian wrote:
thebish wrote:dizzy heights... 16th!!
Dropped to 17th, Boro just equalised.

poo-buckets!

mrkint
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2681
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by mrkint » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:03 pm

throwawayboltonian wrote:
thebish wrote:dizzy heights... 16th!!
Dropped to 17th, Boro just equalised.
Freedman out.

Jez
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:13 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Jez » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:03 pm

Haven't felt this good about the team since Dougie's last little run, but here we are 7 games unbeaten with 3 wins in there and it seems safe to say we're turning into a team in form. Glad the club stood by Dougie during the rough start. Really hope there's optimism and faith in Dougie in the dressing room and we can start to climb the table because we still have a squad that should realistically be challenging to go up.

bedwetter2
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 859
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:16 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by bedwetter2 » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:03 pm

They are for the quieter periods. :mrgreen:

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:10 pm

Cheers Tango. Thanks for the commentary. Eel pie here I come (yuck).
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:12 pm

bedwetter2 wrote:They are for the quieter periods. :mrgreen:
:D

Peter Thompson
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Peter Thompson » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:12 pm

Before the usual accusing suspects appear....

I didn't go so I can't possibly comment on the performance, but it's certainly a good result to improve the teams confidence - well done it's certainly an improvement.

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9131
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Harry Genshaw » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:17 pm

Thanks for the commentary Tango. Appreciated :oyea:

Thems that went - reports please!
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:27 pm

Peter Thompson wrote:Before the usual accusing suspects appear....

I didn't go so I can't possibly comment on the performance, but it's certainly a good result to improve the teams confidence - well done it's certainly an improvement.

:shock:

:wink:
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 32757
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:28 pm

We were the better team today, first two goals were both built up pretty well, second one was a great through ball from Ream to Beckford. Beckford seems to be playing with more confidence and in truth could've had a couple more on a different day. We did get nervous in between our first and second goals. It was a bit "job done" after goal number one. We seemed to go more on the counter in the second half and nearly sprung the defence on a few occasions. Hall looked pretty good. They were in a spell of pressure second half when Knight came on to shore it up a bit, and Moritz eventually wrapped it up.

I'd forgotten what a home win felt like. I can now confirm, it feels pretty good.

SmokinFrazier
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by SmokinFrazier » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:37 pm

Good result.

Jakerbeef
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1288
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:57 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Jakerbeef » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:45 pm

Ahem, 2nd week in a row. Called it. :D

Next week...hmm. I'll let you know.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 32757
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:47 pm

Jakerbeef wrote:Ahem, 2nd week in a row. Called it. :D

Next week...hmm. I'll let you know.
You will not fail next week.

I know this to be true.

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by ChrisC » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:00 pm

Great result and 3 quality goals. Don't miss them tonight.

I got shot down last home game for saying we was playing better stuff. Today we didn't do anything dramatically different from that game.. Didn't hold the ball much.. Gave it away lots etc but we was clinical when it mattered.

Ream and Mills = quality today. Have been for a while now.

Just a shame we have an international break now and can't push on.

Onwards and upwards :D

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by ChrisC » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:03 pm

SmokinFrazier wrote:Good result.

Out of interest, would you still sack DF now or stick with him SF?

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by LeverEnd » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:07 pm

Just home, much needed and deserved result and 3 excellent goals. The first was a good passing move and team goal. 2nd goal the ball was being passed sideways at the back and no-one really showing so Ream took responsibility and drove forwards, passed it, got it back and then threaded Beckford through. The third was a counter finished with real class by Mirtz, he had plenty to do but looked very confident.
Highlights were Beckford looking like a proper striker and now on a genuine scoring run, great play from Ream to set up his goal, and Moritz looking like a class act and capping it with a tremendous finish right ion front of me. Middle 30mins of 2nd half were pretty awful and I was expecting them to equalise as we were practically inviting them to do so, as we do. Not happy at that point, but one good breakaway goal later I'm a lot more cheerful.
We defended well apart from the slip for their goal, and Beckford looked good but Medo and Spearing were disappointing, as was Lee.
Really hope he starts Moritz over a few games now, he's just what we need, seems to have a bit of everything, strong, quick and skilful. remains to be seen if he'll be consistent.
Feeney was well marshalled by Bap, ably assisted by Danns who gave another energetic performance.
...

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:14 pm

ChrisC wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:Good result.

Out of interest, would you still sack DF now or stick with him SF?
What makes you think he might not be a clueless know nowt any more?
Sto ut Serviam

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by BL3 » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:17 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:Good result.
Out of interest, would you still sack DF now or stick with him SF?
What makes you think he might not be a clueless know nowt any more?
Talk us through Ream's performance today.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests