The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Locked
Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:35 am

Good mate of mine down here is a Blackpool fan (!) (Lytham St Annes exile) and season ticket holder at Bloomfield Road. He reckons Baptiste can play anywhere in the back four and do a good job. He says the downside is his lack of pace. In his view he is perfectly competent in the Championship but would get stuffed in the PL.

We shall see.
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14094
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by officer_dibble » Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:49 am

No bobo!

I have come to the conclusion that senior players like Davies, Ricketts and Knight escaped criticism because of the tit who was in charge...and I'm making up for lost time! Dougie has not been shy in shipping our losers out, hopefully to be replaced with some winners.

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14094
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by officer_dibble » Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:51 am

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:Good mate of mine down here is a Blackpool fan (!) (Lytham St Annes exile) and season ticket holder at Bloomfield Road. He reckons Baptiste can play anywhere in the back four and do a good job. He says the downside is his lack of pace. In his view he is perfectly competent in the Championship but would get stuffed in the PL.

We shall see.
I wouldnt be unhappy with a back four of Mears/Baptiste/Wheater/Tierney

If what your mate says is true its a slow centre half pairing (but then so is any without Ream. And he isnt playing).

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Fri Jul 05, 2013 8:55 am

I always thought Baptise was quite pacy (as far as CB goes)
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by bobo the clown » Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:21 am

DF plans to use him primarily as a Right Back though I understood.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by thebish » Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:24 am

bobo the clown wrote:DF plans to use him primarily as a Right Back though I understood.
correct!
Bolton boss Dougie Freedman has confirmed that Alex Baptiste will be signed as a right-back and not a utility player.

The 27-year-old defender, whose move from Blackpool has not yet been officially ratified, played in three different positions last season but Freedman says there is no doubt in his mind that Baptiste is a right-back.

"Once everything is sorted, I am signing him as a right-back, 100 per cent," he told The Bolton News.

"He can play in other positions but I feel that is the position where he would be of best value to the team.

Norpig
Promising
Promising
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Norpig » Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:06 am

As I was surfing the net this morning I found this article which looks at our squad as it stands.

http://www.lionofviennasuite.com/2013/7 ... -transfers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?

I think the left side of the team will have to be significantly strengthened before August. Why is it season after season we struggle to get decent left sided players??

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:35 am

There are less of them on the market?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

Gravedigger
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1144
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: North London, originally Farnworth

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Gravedigger » Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:59 am

Could we not simply alter the pitch some 90 degrees? 8)
Don't try to be a great man. Just be a man and let history make up its own mind.

Bijou Bob
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3935
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:35 pm
Location: Swashbucklin in Brooklyn

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Bijou Bob » Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:04 am

Anelka to West Brom on a years deal with a further year as a possibility. Jammy gits :(
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by ChrisC » Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:42 am

Nixon says Nugent has injured himself in training and could be the reason for the delay on Beckford.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28813
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:48 am

ChrisC wrote:Nixon says Nugent has injured himself in training and could be the reason for the delay on Beckford.
Always there with the unnecessary late interjection...

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by thebish » Fri Jul 05, 2013 12:10 pm

ChrisC wrote:Nixon says Nugent has injured himself in training and could be the reason for the delay on Beckford.
bugger... looks like we'll have to take rhodes instead...

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28813
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri Jul 05, 2013 12:40 pm

thebish wrote:looks like we'll have to take rhodes instead...
Alright - you take the high one and I'll take the low one

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by thebish » Fri Jul 05, 2013 12:45 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
thebish wrote:looks like we'll have to take rhodes instead...
Alright - you take the high one and I'll take the low one
I'll take the one less traveled...

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Harry Genshaw » Fri Jul 05, 2013 12:51 pm

Anyone see Ricketts comments as a possible dig at Dougie?

Something along the lines of "I've signed for Jackett cos he's a nice guy and there aren't many nice managers in football"

Since our previous manager was 'the nicest guy in football', I wondered if there had been a wee fall out?
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14085
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by boltonboris » Fri Jul 05, 2013 12:56 pm

Don't forget, as soon as Dougie came in, Sam was the first to tell us all how much better he was than the wanker before him...

Think he just pays lip service to whoever is his gaffer. Naturally.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36396
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jul 05, 2013 1:00 pm

I think it's a bit of a stretch to see that as a dig against anyone other than football managers in general.

I liked Ricketts as a player and he seemed a very decent and down to earth guy.

Prior to last season he was a proper solid defender you could put anywhere across the back four and he'd do a decent enough job for you.

However, last season he was exposed too often and I think the right decision was taken all round.

Good luck to him as far as I'm concerned.

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Fri Jul 05, 2013 2:03 pm

I remember when Cahill was out injured and Ricketts filled in and was immense some were saying he should of kept his spot
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28813
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri Jul 05, 2013 2:24 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:I think it's a bit of a stretch to see that as a dig against anyone other than football managers in general.
Oh I don't know mate, if it were about OC I reckon you'd manage :D

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GhostoftheBok and 102 guests