TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
- Location: Cromwell Country
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
May as well re-sign Nolan...
Professionalism, the last refuge of the talentless
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
I wouldn't mind Matt Phillips or Puncheon off Blackpool/Southampton respectively.
Pfffft.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Craig Gardner is Kevin Nolan. Good player, but no in a four four two. Cameron Jerome would waltz into our starting XI at this moment in time, despite being shit. Jay Bothroyd, not being shit, would not only waltz into our starting XI, but be a good signing. As long as he didn't play alongside Davo. Klasnic is essentially disabled. SWP on reasonable wages would be a cracking signing, and Crouch would be too. Neither will happen, and Spurs will demand about £20m for Crouch as they are a sent of cnuts. Sunderland will then pay it. Petrov is shite, but at least he provides the caped inhabitant of the Lofthouse Lower with some fun.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Prufrock wrote:Klasnic is essentially disabled.
do we know how true this is? I'm not saying it isn't - but it strikes me that there are other reasons he only got subs appearances last season....
1. that he couldn't get ahead of davo and elmo
2. the court case that hung over him for a while
is it really true he can't actually play 90mins?
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
He didn't look like he could last season at all. But, I think number 2 could have been a big feature as well, he has said that he thinks it hung over his season last year and hopefully that means he'll get better next season.thebish wrote:Prufrock wrote:Klasnic is essentially disabled.
do we know how true this is? I'm not saying it isn't - but it strikes me that there are other reasons he only got subs appearances last season....
1. that he couldn't get ahead of davo and elmo
2. the court case that hung over him for a while
is it really true he can't actually play 90mins?
Regardless of that I think even if he was able he would have been struggling as in the first half of the season to get a start with Elmander and Davies in form and then his courtcase hit and then we had Sturridge for him to compete with.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
LiOC wrote:He didn't look like he could last season at all. But, I think number 2 could have been a big feature as well, he has said that he thinks it hung over his season last year and hopefully that means he'll get better next season.thebish wrote:Prufrock wrote:Klasnic is essentially disabled.
do we know how true this is? I'm not saying it isn't - but it strikes me that there are other reasons he only got subs appearances last season....
1. that he couldn't get ahead of davo and elmo
2. the court case that hung over him for a while
is it really true he can't actually play 90mins?
Regardless of that I think even if he was able he would have been struggling as in the first half of the season to get a start with Elmander and Davies in form and then his courtcase hit and then we had Sturridge for him to compete with.
Pru may well be right - but I'd be surprised if we had signed a player who we already knew could not last 90mins...
also - any player who only plays the occasional game looks a bit leggy towards the end...
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Tbf, the season before he could play a lot longer too IIRCthebish wrote:
Pru may well be right - but I'd be surprised if we had signed a player who we already knew could not last 90mins...
also - any player who only plays the occasional game looks a bit leggy towards the end...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
So what you're saying is we'll spend 4m on. A player who is not as good as the two we had last year but have now gone? And you're happy to do that?TKIZ! wrote:He couldn't oust Sturridge because he was banging them in for fun and Coyle's highly unlikely to drop Davies who has provided the most assists this season. He wasn't likely to drop Elmander who did a job for us in midfieldBWFC_Insane wrote:Let me get this straight, we are planning to spend 4m on a player to replace 2 we lost last year. The player in question could not oust either of the ones he is 'replacing' out of the side last year. That's a sign of progress if ever I saw one.....oh hang on........
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
meh, DJ Campbell and Vaughan (who wants to stay in the area) on frees and we can sign as many wingers as coyle likes with the cahill money!
-
- Promising
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:43 pm
- Location: NYC, USA
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
But Elmo cost over 8mil (can anyone adjust for inflation?) and Sturridge has a 20mil price tag attached to him.BWFC_Insane wrote:So what you're saying is we'll spend 4m on. A player who is not as good as the two we had last year but have now gone? And you're happy to do that?TKIZ! wrote:He couldn't oust Sturridge because he was banging them in for fun and Coyle's highly unlikely to drop Davies who has provided the most assists this season. He wasn't likely to drop Elmander who did a job for us in midfieldBWFC_Insane wrote:Let me get this straight, we are planning to spend 4m on a player to replace 2 we lost last year. The player in question could not oust either of the ones he is 'replacing' out of the side last year. That's a sign of progress if ever I saw one.....oh hang on........
Yeah I'm surprised we haven't shown any interest yet. Would be a good (and cheap) bit of business.officer_dibble wrote:meh, DJ Campbell and Vaughan (who wants to stay in the area) on frees and we can sign as many wingers as coyle likes with the cahill money!
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
We're not going to replace them with players who have the same quality, but we need to replace their goals. Simplistically, the four strikers (Elmo, Sturridge, Klasnic and Davies) got 30 goals between them last season, which is 7.5 each. I wouldn't have thought it was impossible for us to sign two strikers who can get at least 7/8 goals each over the season.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Then we should be proud of doing our bit for diversity in football. Bravo Bolton Wanderers.thebish wrote:Prufrock wrote:Klasnic is essentially disabled.
do we know how true this is ?
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
To be fair, it is a long standing tradition at the club...bobo the clown wrote:Then we should be proud of doing our bit for diversity in football. Bravo Bolton Wanderers.thebish wrote:Prufrock wrote:Klasnic is essentially disabled.
do we know how true this is ?
As anyone who watched Henry Mowbray as one full back and Peter Nicholson as the other...
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Well unless Chelsea have a massive change of heart and decide we can have Sturridge for £2m and Elmo has a massive change of heart and comes back on a £2m deal then yes I suppose that's what I'm sayingBWFC_Insane wrote:So what you're saying is we'll spend 4m on. A player who is not as good as the two we had last year but have now gone? And you're happy to do that?TKIZ! wrote:He couldn't oust Sturridge because he was banging them in for fun and Coyle's highly unlikely to drop Davies who has provided the most assists this season. He wasn't likely to drop Elmander who did a job for us in midfieldBWFC_Insane wrote:Let me get this straight, we are planning to spend 4m on a player to replace 2 we lost last year. The player in question could not oust either of the ones he is 'replacing' out of the side last year. That's a sign of progress if ever I saw one.....oh hang on........
But then the only alternative at the moment has been mooted as Cameron Jerome. A striker who scored a whopping 3 goals all season and comes with a moohasive unjustified £8m price tag.
Pfffft.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
I don't understand why you keep coming back to a player we've repeatedly stated we have no interest in.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Because that's one of the strikers mentioned in Gossip/Transfer rumours as is Rodrigo.
Pfffft.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1276
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:07 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
http://www.fansfc.com/story/33052.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
According to this site, Newcastle are coming in for Gardner for a price of £5million.
According to this site, Newcastle are coming in for Gardner for a price of £5million.
NEIL LENNON'S SUPERWHITE ARMY
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
I was about to book the taxi for him, but they're actually talking about Craig Gardner.Tals-biggest-fan wrote:http://www.fansfc.com/story/33052.html
According to this site, Newcastle are coming in for Gardner for a price of £5million.
LL do the whole headslap thingy will you.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
To be honest I think Jerome for 5m would be better value than Rodrigo for 4. Just think rodrigo is some way off being a centre forward in the premier league and Jerome as poor as he is in front of goal is a handful sometimes in the same way KD is. But it's ridiculous to suggest they're the only 2 options!
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Aye, I wasn't suggesting for a second that they are the only two options, just only two that have been mentioned so far.BWFC_Insane wrote:To be honest I think Jerome for 5m would be better value than Rodrigo for 4. Just think rodrigo is some way off being a centre forward in the premier league and Jerome as poor as he is in front of goal is a handful sometimes in the same way KD is. But it's ridiculous to suggest they're the only 2 options!
We agree to disagree on this one, I think Rodrigo would be better option and some others don't but that's why we debate on this lovely forum of ours
Pfffft.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: truewhite15 and 29 guests