Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Not sure about that, though they may not wish to spend on Cahill or at all.BWFC_Insane wrote:I'm almost certain that Cahill will still be a Bolton player come Thursday.
Arsenal are bringing Mertesacker in, Spurs don't have the money , can't see anyone else coming in at this stage.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Depends if they cave in on Modric, dunnit
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:05 am
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
It's a bit of both. Throw a completely new team together, and it would be naive to think that they wouldn't be able to perform to a good standard as a team straight away.Annoyed Grunt wrote:Hmmm, possibly. Don't think that "gelling" is a myth, in my opinion.Lofthouse Lower wrote:No, they played like a bunch of reserves against a top team.
However, puttimg two or three new players into a team that has played together for a few years, there wouldn't be too much of a problem.
http://www.twitter.com/chrisbradish" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Really? Now that's a far better example of bollocks. At times, particularly defending, we've looked like none of ours ever met each other. Why bother training as a team, just do some running and a couple of visits to the gym then?Lofthouse Lower wrote:That's an old-fashioned cliche - a load of bollocks too.TANGODANCER wrote:Just wondering how long it'll take for all these new faces to learn to play with each other as a team. Just a thought.
They're pro footballers, not a bunch of blokes in a park. 'Gelling' is a myth.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Well as you say, it doesn't seem to make much difference.
Funny then how some players drop right in and are on fire immediately.
Sturridge for example - like shit off a shovel - no gelling.
Elmander - here for three years - never quite did 'fit'.
Funny then how some players drop right in and are on fire immediately.
Sturridge for example - like shit off a shovel - no gelling.
Elmander - here for three years - never quite did 'fit'.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Indeed it is. I'm inclined to borrow CAPS's lorry for this one.TANGODANCER wrote:Really? Now that's a far better example of bollocks. At times, particularly defending, we've looked like none of ours ever met each other. Why bother training as a team, just do some running and a couple of visits to the gym then?Lofthouse Lower wrote:That's an old-fashioned cliche - a load of bollocks too.TANGODANCER wrote:Just wondering how long it'll take for all these new faces to learn to play with each other as a team. Just a thought.
They're pro footballers, not a bunch of blokes in a park. 'Gelling' is a myth.
In the real world of football video games there is obviously no gelling coefficient for new players in a team.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
SSN have confirmed Arsenal have ended there interest in Cahill.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
oh well he will go to spurs now who will feed you with the sh!t they wanted to get rid off and take him for 6 million + bassong and hutton or some sh!t like that
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Shit that probably would walk into your first team.
Man, I'd 8-2 be an Arsenal fan right now
Man, I'd 8-2 be an Arsenal fan right now
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Where now the gay Lothario?Abs wrote:oh well he will go to spurs now who will feed you with the sh!t they wanted to get rid off and take him for 6 million + bassong and hutton or some sh!t like that
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
we had too many players out and in the end it was good resiult because we have signed 3 players since and more are coming. But you guys tried to fleece us knowing we are desperate and played yourself here. Because now Spurs will know you have 24 hours to do a deal or lose him for free. Good luck to Cahill though, he has handled himself like a pro unlike your clown chairmanLofthouse Lower wrote:Shit that probably would walk into your first team.
Man, I'd 8-2 be an Arsenal fan right now
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
You have signed players, yes.
One being Mertesacker - a massive stump
Another being a leftback from Brazil - well known as being ace, they are
You personally however have acted like a massive nice person.
One being Mertesacker - a massive stump
Another being a leftback from Brazil - well known as being ace, they are
You personally however have acted like a massive nice person.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Enjoy watching Mertesacker Not often we get a defender over here who Kevin Davies can out-run.
Wenger fails again. Had the money. Gone for cheap foreign imports like Mertesacker, Chu-Young and Santos rather than Premier League experience.
Wenger fails again. Had the money. Gone for cheap foreign imports like Mertesacker, Chu-Young and Santos rather than Premier League experience.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
You mean "have his services for another year"!Abs wrote:we had too many players out and in the end it was good resiult because we have signed 3 players since and more are coming. But you guys tried to fleece us knowing we are desperate and played yourself here. Because now Spurs will know you have 24 hours to do a deal or lose him for free. Good luck to Cahill though, he has handled himself like a pro unlike your clown chairman
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Chu-Young and Santos = relegated
Top class signings, Arsene
He really shouldn't be trusted to spend
Top class signings, Arsene
He really shouldn't be trusted to spend
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Being Brazillian automatically means Pele, Socrates, Garrincha and Roberto Carlos all rolled into one. Thought you'd know that LL.Lofthouse Lower wrote:You have signed players, yes.
One being Mertesacker - a massive stump
Another being a leftback from Brazil - well known as being ace, they are
You personally however have acted like a massive tw*t.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8603
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Abs wrote:we had too many players out and in the end it was good resiult because we have signed 3 players since and more are coming. But you guys tried to fleece us knowing we are desperate and played yourself here. Because now Spurs will know you have 24 hours to do a deal or lose him for free. Good luck to Cahill though, he has handled himself like a pro unlike your clown chairmanLofthouse Lower wrote:Shit that probably would walk into your first team.
Man, I'd 8-2 be an Arsenal fan right now
You've known for the last two years you've needed a centre-back. You came seeking to test our resolve with a shit bid. You lied about the shit bid and came back with a slightly higher shit bid which we turned down.
Had you been desperate you would have offered (close to) his stated value and not pissed about with insults. You (Arsenal) are the losers in this state of affairs. Now jog on you South London tosspot.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Abs wrote:we had too many players out and in the end it was good resiult because we have signed 3 players since and more are coming. But you guys tried to fleece us knowing we are desperate and played yourself here. Because now Spurs will know you have 24 hours to do a deal or lose him for free. Good luck to Cahill though, he has handled himself like a pro unlike your clown chairmanLofthouse Lower wrote:Shit that probably would walk into your first team.
Man, I'd 8-2 be an Arsenal fan right now
I doubt that you'll be using the words "Mertesacker" and "good result" that often in the coming months - so enjoy it while you can!
anyway - now Arsenal's interest is officially at an end - you've no obvious reason to be here. it's been lovely getting to know you - we'll miss you.
you can have a lollipop off that nice man over there before you leave.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
In Abs' world I really think he doesTANGODANCER wrote:Being Brazillian automatically means Pele, Socrates, Garrincha and Roberto Carlos all rolled into one. Thought you'd know that LL.Lofthouse Lower wrote:You have signed players, yes.
One being Mertesacker - a massive stump
Another being a leftback from Brazil - well known as being ace, they are
You personally however have acted like a massive tw*t.
In Arsene we rust
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
anyway....no need to fight now. lets just hope Cahill doesnt go to Spurs. he deserve better than that
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], knobpolisher and 133 guests