Gartside out
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
BoltonScott wrote:As if. What the f*ck has fat chops ever done for usEast Lower wrote:It makes sense, unlike you. FACT.
You wouldn't have a club to support were it not for Gartside. Show some respect.
you mean... apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh-water system, and public health?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
- Location: Cromwell Country
-
- Promising
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:43 pm
- Location: NYC, USA
And even if he hasn't, there are a pretty general set of guidelines that run through all internet message boards. Mixed with a bit of common sense and basic decency most of these 'problem posters' should never arise. But obviously they do, because they're missing one or both of those two components.CrazyHorse wrote:Perhaps.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Easy, hoss, our friend's new and might need to know the rules. Surely he can be as bonkers as he likes, as long as he's not offensive...?CrazyHorse wrote:Wind your neck in mate. Otherwise your brief site membership will abruptly end.BoltonScott wrote:As if. What the f*ck has fat chops ever done for us
But then again I've not got all afternoon to keep tabs on him on the off chance he starts getting abusive. Which is why I've politely asked him to wind his neck in.
And he knows the rules because as a new member he's just read through & agreed to them just as the rest of us did when we signed up.
This is Nutasha we're talking about though...SonsOfThunder wrote:And even if he hasn't, there are a pretty general set of guidelines that run through all internet message boards. Mixed with a bit of common sense and basic decency most of these 'problem posters' should never arise. But obviously they do, because they're missing one or both of those two components.CrazyHorse wrote:Perhaps.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Easy, hoss, our friend's new and might need to know the rules. Surely he can be as bonkers as he likes, as long as he's not offensive...?CrazyHorse wrote:Wind your neck in mate. Otherwise your brief site membership will abruptly end.BoltonScott wrote:As if. What the f*ck has fat chops ever done for us
But then again I've not got all afternoon to keep tabs on him on the off chance he starts getting abusive. Which is why I've politely asked him to wind his neck in.
And he knows the rules because as a new member he's just read through & agreed to them just as the rest of us did when we signed up.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:35 pm
- Location: Bolton
As i've already told him, there are other forums to satisfy his needs...if he wants to be offensive then he can do so on one of those.SonsOfThunder wrote:And even if he hasn't, there are a pretty general set of guidelines that run through all internet message boards. Mixed with a bit of common sense and basic decency most of these 'problem posters' should never arise. But obviously they do, because they're missing one or both of those two components.CrazyHorse wrote:Perhaps.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Easy, hoss, our friend's new and might need to know the rules. Surely he can be as bonkers as he likes, as long as he's not offensive...?CrazyHorse wrote:Wind your neck in mate. Otherwise your brief site membership will abruptly end.BoltonScott wrote:As if. What the f*ck has fat chops ever done for us
But then again I've not got all afternoon to keep tabs on him on the off chance he starts getting abusive. Which is why I've politely asked him to wind his neck in.
And he knows the rules because as a new member he's just read through & agreed to them just as the rest of us did when we signed up.

Never give up on something that you can't go a day without thinking about.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
- Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Obviously this new guy is annoying but in fairness there was a three year period in which it seemed Gartside was either smoking crack or trying to bring the club down from the inside. Letting Allardyce go and then sniping with him in public, appointing Sammy Lee, appointing Megson then backing him with a relatively huge amount of money, it was a nightmare. Coyle looks like a good appointment but I fear the damage may already have been done; we'll see what happens in January.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
H. Pedersen wrote:Obviously this new guy is annoying but in fairness there was a three year period in which it seemed Gartside was either smoking crack or trying to bring the club down from the inside. Letting Allardyce go and then sniping with him in public, appointing Sammy Lee, appointing Megson then backing him with a relatively huge amount of money, it was a nightmare. Coyle looks like a good appointment but I fear the damage may already have been done; we'll see what happens in January.

Aye because Gartside went "Ok Sam off you pop, we've got far better here".

- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
H. Pedersen wrote:Obviously this new guy is annoying but in fairness there was a three year period in which it seemed Gartside was either smoking crack or trying to bring the club down from the inside. Letting Allardyce go and then sniping with him in public, appointing Sammy Lee, appointing Megson then backing him with a relatively huge amount of money, it was a nightmare. Coyle looks like a good appointment but I fear the damage may already have been done; we'll see what happens in January.
Lee was a cock-up - Meggo (arguably) did an emergency job....
but - "letting allardyce go"??? What would your strategy have been to keep Big Sam? (and why? - were our results not sliding down a skid-marked pan at the time he left?)
On balance - given our two European tours and consistent top 8 finishes - our looooooooooooooooooooong stay in the premiership considering our smallish crowds and consequently smallish budget and our lack of sex-appeal to draw big names - I'd say garty's reign has been phenomenally successful.
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Did he pass the pipe?H. Pedersen wrote:Obviously this new guy is annoying but in fairness there was a three year period in which it seemed Gartside was either smoking crack or trying to bring the club down from the inside. Letting Allardyce go and then sniping with him in public, appointing Sammy Lee, appointing Megson then backing him with a relatively huge amount of money, it was a nightmare. Coyle looks like a good appointment but I fear the damage may already have been done; we'll see what happens in January.
Gartside has done more for this club than anyone in the last twenty years. He brought Allardyce in and gave him a 10 year deal. Unprecedented.
He gave Sammy Lee the job; a job he'd been understudying for, for nigh on 3 years. Who could have expected such a disaster?
He brought in Megson, who took us out of the bottom three and stabilised us albeit with boring negative football. He organised a bigger budget than any previous manager has ever seen. He sacked Megson when his position became untenable.
He brought in Coyle, and has so far been seen as right to do so and I for one hope Gartside continues in his role for many years to come. I suspect he won't though and then we'll see who is good for the club.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
- Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Can we get over this myth that Megson performed a miracle by keeping is up in 07-08? He inherited a team that had finished 7th the year before and was good enough to get into the quarter finals of the UEFA Cup. Oh and he had £12 million to work with. And he managed to avoid relegation by one point and a handful of goals. Nobody was jizzing in their pants when Redknapp kept Spurs up after their horrible start.
Megson was a terrible appointment, no question.
Megson was a terrible appointment, no question.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Oh yes they were..H. Pedersen wrote:Can we get over this myth that Megson performed a miracle by keeping is up in 07-08? He inherited a team that had finished 7th the year before and was good enough to get into the quarter finals of the UEFA Cup. Oh and he had £12 million to work with. And he managed to avoid relegation by one point and a handful of goals. Nobody was jizzing in their pants when Redknapp kept Spurs up after their horrible start.
Megson was a terrible appointment, no question.
Plus, Spurs had a squad choc full of top players who were underperforming. We were left with a squad of inexperienced players with limited ability, albeit with a couple of starlets littered in there. Megson turned things around and along with his new signings kept us up.. That's what was needed, unfortunately, we showed signs of regression. Gartside stepped in and the rest, as they say, is history.
He's been magnificent for this club and I wouldn't swap him for any other chairman in the land.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
H. Pedersen wrote:Can we get over this myth that Megson performed a miracle by keeping is up in 07-08? He inherited a team that had finished 7th the year before and was good enough to get into the quarter finals of the UEFA Cup. Oh and he had £12 million to work with. And he managed to avoid relegation by one point and a handful of goals. Nobody was jizzing in their pants when Redknapp kept Spurs up after their horrible start.
Megson was a terrible appointment, no question.
I think we should steer clear of the megson debate once more..
BUT - I would be interested to hear how and why you would have kept hold of want-away allardyce at the time....
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
- Location: Seattle, WA, USA
By giving him some of the £40 million Megson ended up getting. I understand that Allardyce probably wanted a lot of money, and if Megson had stabilized us at 13th place on the type of budget Coyle and Allardyce had access to then I could understand letting Allardyce leave. However, we plunged down the table even though Megson was spending unheard of amounts on transfers and the wage bill was exploding.
H. Pedersen wrote:By giving him some of the £40 million Megson ended up getting. I understand that Allardyce probably wanted a lot of money, and if Megson had stabilized us at 13th place on the type of budget Coyle and Allardyce had access to then I could understand letting Allardyce leave. However, we plunged down the table even though Megson was spending unheard of amounts on transfers and the wage bill was exploding.
you think that offering allardyce a bigger transfer kitty would have been
1. money well spent (see who he did buy shortly afterwards with his newcastle budget)
2. enough to keep him (given his increasingly frenetic efforts to land himself a "bigger" job)
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Not initially we didn't. And when we did start to slide Gartside got rid. Seeing as this is a post about Gartside I still maintain he's done a bloody good job overall.H. Pedersen wrote:By giving him some of the £40 million Megson ended up getting. I understand that Allardyce probably wanted a lot of money, and if Megson had stabilized us at 13th place on the type of budget Coyle and Allardyce had access to then I could understand letting Allardyce leave. However, we plunged down the table even though Megson was spending unheard of amounts on transfers and the wage bill was exploding.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], irie Cee Bee and 45 guests