david wheater

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:02 pm

Was thinking the same. With Holden and Davies to feed once he'd won the ball, think we'd have the makings of a decent midfield. Mandy has at times looked like a striker capable of being a lone striker, by showing a bit more strength and quickness at times. Be an interesting experiment

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: david wheater

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:08 pm

I disagree with just about everyone here. (Yay!)

I think Coyle is working on Muamba being a box-to-boxer (or more than a sitter, anyroad). I like this idea, because I think he's got the speed and strength for it. Sure, he's not hit the heights lately, but he's young and a work in progress. Loads of players are only just breaking into the first team squad at his age, he's already nailed 100+ professional games(nearly 100 just for us).

And I think in tandem with Holden's energy and tenacity, it makes our 4 man midfield tick, when on song.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:13 pm

I just worry that by trying to make him into a box to box-er, which is admirable we're having to improve his fitness, his tackling, his awareness, his short passing, his long passing, his shotting and his control.

Whereas, make him a defensive holding-type midfielder then you're just looking at awareness, tackling and short passing.

Gaz Tomorrow
Promising
Promising
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 5:57 pm
Location: Near Exeter

Re: david wheater

Post by Gaz Tomorrow » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:14 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I disagree with just about everyone here. (Yay!)

I think Coyle is working on Muamba being a box-to-boxer (or more than a sitter, anyroad). I like this idea, because I think he's got the speed and strength for it. Sure, he's not hit the heights lately, but he's young and a work in progress. Loads of players are only just breaking into the first team squad at his age, he's already nailed 100+ professional games(nearly 100 just for us).

And I think in tandem with Holden's energy and tenacity, it makes our 4 man midfield tick, when on song.
I'm backing you on this one LK.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: david wheater

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:15 pm

hisroyalgingerness wrote:I just worry that by trying to make him into a box to box-er, which is admirable we're having to improve his fitness, his tackling, his awareness, his short passing, his long passing, his shotting and his control.

Whereas, make him a defensive holding-type midfielder then you're just looking at awareness, tackling and short passing.
I'd pin his ears, too!
May the bridges I burn light your way

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:19 pm

Other thing is LK, when you're one of two in the middle of a four man mid, you can't really afford to "not hit the heights", such is the important of the role to making the whole team function both in attack and defence

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: david wheater

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:42 pm

Noted and accepted. Perhaps we need another Holden or Muamba in the squad, rather than a Mark Davies?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:44 pm

Sadly for Mark I think he's a luxury that you can accommodate in a 5-man mid but doesn't seem to get as stuck in for a 4. He drifts from games too much. But when he drifts back in he does seem to have a habit of being involved in decent attacking moves

scotty
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:14 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by scotty » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:49 pm

This is what a Boro fan I know had to say about Wheater...

The ratings in the loacal paper would have you believe he's been our stand out player this term, not much competition there though sadly!.....

He has all the attributes to be a TOP player BUT a tendency to lose concentration/switch off & lose his man, the vast majority of our goals conceded he's been @ least partially to blame, a change of scenery could be what he needs, BUT for me he was only any good when Woodgate was watching out for him, when he has to be the main man in defence he struggles, if the fee is only £2m you can't really go wrong, BUT don't expect him to fill Cahill's boots seamlessly!......


As for Muamba, the number of times he misplaces a simple 5 or 10 yard pass (or as those who went to Villa would have seen, a 2 yard pass) is frightening. The less said about his shooting the better, BUT as everybody knows, he is superb at breaking up play and when he's on form he is a vital player for us. Much better when he's sitting alongside Stuart Holden who is now a massive player for us.
Who's that coming up the hill boys,
The Wanderers are coming up the hill boys,
They all laugh at us, they all mock at us,
They all say our days are numbered,

Born to be a Wanderer, victorious are we....

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: david wheater

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:51 pm

The difficulty is that I do like Davies (M) as a player. But he just isn't strong enough for a 4 man midfield. Parking the whys and wherefors of Coyle's adherence to a 4-4-2 to one side, that makes him a bit of a "luxury". However, he's a cracking little player who could fit into a 3 man centyre. Its difficult, but its a nice conundrum to have, rather than JOB or McCann.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: david wheater

Post by William the White » Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:10 pm

scotty wrote:This is what a Boro fan I know had to say about Wheater...

The ratings in the loacal paper would have you believe he's been our stand out player this term, not much competition there though sadly!.....

He has all the attributes to be a TOP player BUT a tendency to lose concentration/switch off & lose his man, the vast majority of our goals conceded he's been @ least partially to blame, a change of scenery could be what he needs, BUT for me he was only any good when Woodgate was watching out for him, when he has to be the main man in defence he struggles, if the fee is only £2m you can't really go wrong, BUT don't expect him to fill Cahill's boots seamlessly!......


As for Muamba, the number of times he misplaces a simple 5 or 10 yard pass (or as those who went to Villa would have seen, a 2 yard pass) is frightening. The less said about his shooting the better, BUT as everybody knows, he is superb at breaking up play and when he's on form he is a vital player for us. Much better when he's sitting alongside Stuart Holden who is now a massive player for us.
Spot on. 100% agree.

User avatar
tell ben im him
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Location: very close

Re: david wheater

Post by tell ben im him » Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:33 pm

Harry Genshaw wrote:I'm happy about this. From what I've seen of him, he'll be a threat to Knights place.
well if he is not better than knight he will be total shite me thinks
am i right or am i right?

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:36 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:The difficulty is that I do like Davies (M) as a player. But he just isn't strong enough for a 4 man midfield. Parking the whys and wherefors of Coyle's adherence to a 4-4-2 to one side, that makes him a bit of a "luxury". However, he's a cracking little player who could fit into a 3 man centyre. Its difficult, but its a nice conundrum to have, rather than JOB or McCann.
And that's really why I think we need to bring in midfielders before more strikers. Because it wouldn't be the worse thing in the world to go play with one up top.

Like you say though, it's the gaffer that seems to want to stick to it

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34734
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:03 pm

hisroyalgingerness wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:The difficulty is that I do like Davies (M) as a player. But he just isn't strong enough for a 4 man midfield. Parking the whys and wherefors of Coyle's adherence to a 4-4-2 to one side, that makes him a bit of a "luxury". However, he's a cracking little player who could fit into a 3 man centyre. Its difficult, but its a nice conundrum to have, rather than JOB or McCann.
And that's really why I think we need to bring in midfielders before more strikers. Because it wouldn't be the worse thing in the world to go play with one up top.

Like you say though, it's the gaffer that seems to want to stick to it
Agree with this, and have done for some time. Mavies is good when we're pressing forwards, but I'm not convinced that's what we're putting him in the middle of a four for, and to me, we seem to be shorter defensively when he plays - but part of that could be because he's not Holden.

In a "one up top", who are you going to leave out? Davo or Elmander? Or play one of them at right mid (think they've both done that job on occasion)? or as an extra centre attacking mid?

Ianmooreslovechild
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Re: david wheater

Post by Ianmooreslovechild » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:57 pm

Ironic that Megson used to play 451 when we didn't have players capable of making it work. Might make us tighter and a little less fun but you could see Holden and Mavies getting forward to support the attack pretty quickly and we'd have a few players with pace who can run with the ball if we're drawing teams onto us . can't see the Elmo davies pairing being broken up tho so lets hope Moo finds his touch.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: david wheater

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:11 am

Maybe, in a 4, Mark D is best suited to wide right
Sto ut Serviam

malcd1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3608
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:33 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by malcd1 » Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:57 am

Alan Nixon in this mornings Mirror saying the deal to sign Wheater has hit a snag. Boro want £3m for him while we only want to pay £2.25m. The deal may have to wait for the summer when the player is out of contract.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Jan 10, 2011 8:12 am

malcd1 wrote:Alan Nixon in this mornings Mirror saying the deal to sign Wheater has hit a snag. Boro want £3m for him while we only want to pay £2.25m. The deal may have to wait for the summer when the player is out of contract.
Indeed and Mowbray is quoted in other press saying that "Bolton are not the only club interested".

Classic transfer standoff. We're saying "we'll wait till the summer then and you'll get nowt", they're saying "well someone else might get him now then".

Someone will blink, hopefully them.

Another line from Nixons report.
"Bolton want to keep as much cash as possible for other signings in the window"

Does anyone truly think that if we buy Wheater for 2M plus that we'll spend any other money in this window? Because I don't. We wanted Pratley but wouldn't spend 2M on him as he's free in the summer so we're waiting till then. We want Vela on loan and there will be some kind of fee, but I imagine with the idea that he'll get some game time the fee won't be much.
But I just don't believe that we're saving the pennies on Wheater to buy "more players this window". Think thats a bit of postitive Coyle spin. Surely we're saving the pennies because we're broke?

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34734
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Jan 10, 2011 8:36 am

I'm surprised, we're managing to find anything like £2.xm now. I thought we'd have zip.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: david wheater

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Jan 10, 2011 8:42 am

Worthy4England wrote:I'm surprised, we're managing to find anything like £2.xm now. I thought we'd have zip.
Indeed although I imagine its spending based on the summer sale of Cahill and of course AOB going.

So I can sort of see where we've raised a bit of money for a centre back.

Still don't believe the whole, we're trying to save money to buy "as many players as possible in January" line!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], irie Cee Bee and 44 guests