The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38809
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Knight was dropped.....
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31610
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
I gathered as much. Any explanation? Even the haterz on here had widely acknowledged he has been our best defender this term. But if it was a tactical decision to add pace, then you have to applaud...BWFC_Insane wrote:Knight was dropped.....
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:03 am
- Location: Leigh
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Knight played 90 minutes for the reserves last night so it's as you were from Saturday.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:"Mutch!" "Bull!! "Shit!!!" Ah, the 80s.
It'll be interesting to see the line-up. Personally I'd have Chungy in for Afobe, playing the 4-2-3-1, and I'd consider bringing back Knight (any reason given for his absence?); Ream's pace gives us some cover but he's still a bit heart-in-mouth.
Cmon you Whites.
This is the rhythm of Zat Knight
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31610
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Ah... thanks.Leyther_Matt wrote:Knight played 90 minutes for the reserves last night so it's as you were from Saturday.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:03 am
- Location: Leigh
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
First pint supped in Wolverhampton Walkabout. Quietly optimistic given this adternon's developments.
This is the rhythm of Zat Knight
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Have one for me......stuck in wrokLeyther_Matt wrote:First pint supped in Wolverhampton Walkabout. Quietly optimistic given this adternon's developments.

- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Big Zat Knight hater, first time caller.
WTF is he dropped for? Seems harsh - 'pace' cited above...doesn't seem any slower than Mills?
WTF is he dropped for? Seems harsh - 'pace' cited above...doesn't seem any slower than Mills?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Only one pint...are you sure??Leyther_Matt wrote:First pint supped in Wolverhampton Walkabout. Quietly optimistic given this adternon's developments.

Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Come on Bolton, always nice to stuff these whining midlands gits.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Seems like 442 again and Sordell hasn't made the bench
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
No Sordell no Kinght...very odd.
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
I thought it was all Coyle's fault that Sordell wasn't picked.....
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Reckon it could be down to fitness?
Knight played 90 mins yesterday for the U21's, as did Alonso and Wylde.
Knight played 90 mins yesterday for the U21's, as did Alonso and Wylde.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:35 pm
- Location: Berlin
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Zat Knight has been better than Mills and Ream this season. Maybe its an attitude thing. Could even stem back to the start of the season when he wouldn't resign for a while. Not 100% committed
Eisern Union!
HGW XX/7 Gewidmet, in Dankbarkeit
HGW XX/7 Gewidmet, in Dankbarkeit
-
- Promising
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:47 pm
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
No Freedman at the game...
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Is Sordell injured?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Who?jayneandd wrote:Is Sordell injured?
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Seems that way maybe. Anyways, I suppose you should keep faith when they come back from 2-0 down, eh?Annoyed Grunt wrote:Who?jayneandd wrote:Is Sordell injured?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Over to Tower now for the game. Time for....COME ON YOU WHITES.




Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
updates please tangoTANGODANCER wrote:Over to Tower now for the game. Time for....COME ON YOU WHITES.![]()
![]()
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], LHwhite and 16 guests