REAM...............? Why?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: REAM...............? Why?
I know and that was exactly what you said last time. The point is he cant play central and Knight should be there. Ricketts has enough pace for there to be some balance. If Ream does some upper body work and gets games in the stiffs at left back its the best chance we have to make use of him.Bruce Rioja wrote:I've heard this foolishness before. Take a look at Hull's third goal and you'll soon revise your opinion, Sir. I'm sure.Ianmooreslovechild wrote: Anyway I'm sure he'll be a cracking left back.
He's at fault for both of Boro's goals on Saturday. On the first one McDonald goes the long way around Ream and is still first to the ball, and on the second one Ream just leaves him in yards of space.
Zat Knight, against the odds, has proved more than capable of playing at this level. Ream on the other hand has merely emphasised the point that he's no more a professional footballer than Fred Talbot is.
Cashley cole is hardly a brick outhouse,you dont need to be to play at fullback. Ream needs to man up stay on his feet and compete instead of falling over. There is no reason why he cant start doing this and become a good fullback. He has the pace and ball skills necessary. Build him up mentally and physically and he can do it. Doesnt seem to have been any attempt by the previous regime to address this and sort him out but hey that's not exactly a surprise.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: REAM...............? Why?
Its a sobering thought that for around about the same money we paid for Alonso and Ream we bought Cahill.
Fecking frightening.
Fecking frightening.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: REAM...............? Why?
It is but they are here so lets hope the new manager finds a better use for them than the man who bought them. I dont think either are suited to the positon they were signed to play in.BWFC_Insane wrote:Its a sobering thought that for around about the same money we paid for Alonso and Ream we bought Cahill.
Fecking frightening.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: REAM...............? Why?
Well, I'm yet to to see any evidence of this at all. I seem to recall Coyle trumpeting him in as going like shit off of a polished shovel, yet on Saturday we saw McDonald skin him for the first goal.Ianmooreslovechild wrote: He has the pace and ball skills necessary.
![Confused :conf:](./images/smilies/confused.gif)
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14101
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: REAM...............? Why?
Heard this a few times.. I don't get it. He shows nothing to suggest that he could provide support in an attacking sense. He wouldn't get past the winger and stick a cross in.. If you think that's okay and that he's only there to do a defensive job etc.. Then people need to get off Mears' back. Because Tyrone is a superior defender (positionally) than anybody else in that squad.Ianmooreslovechild wrote: Have to wait and see I guess. I still think he has the attributes of a good fullback.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: REAM...............? Why?
He's a wimp.
If he grew a pair of bollocks then maybe he'd make a decent defender, good on the ball but he's frightened of his own shadow.
Burnley away was the gayest performance I've ever seen from a centre back, he was bullied by the much smaller Burnley forwards all game and is only back in the side now coz Knight can't be arsed turning up for games on time.
If he grew a pair of bollocks then maybe he'd make a decent defender, good on the ball but he's frightened of his own shadow.
Burnley away was the gayest performance I've ever seen from a centre back, he was bullied by the much smaller Burnley forwards all game and is only back in the side now coz Knight can't be arsed turning up for games on time.
Troll and proud of it.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: REAM...............? Why?
I havent seen enough of mears to comment but what I have seen he looks ok going forward but suspect defensively. Ream, I would suggest is worth trying at left back before we accept that we've tossed 2 million down the pan. It's a different mindset to centre half and until he plays there you cant say whether he will make it or not. As many have already said he doesnt look to have what is needed to be a centre back.boltonboris wrote:Heard this a few times.. I don't get it. He shows nothing to suggest that he could provide support in an attacking sense. He wouldn't get past the winger and stick a cross in.. If you think that's okay and that he's only there to do a defensive job etc.. Then people need to get off Mears' back. Because Tyrone is a superior defender (positionally) than anybody else in that squad.Ianmooreslovechild wrote: Have to wait and see I guess. I still think he has the attributes of a good fullback.
As for pace,Bruce, he is physically quite fast but gets undone when the first 5 yards are in the head. Marginally less of an issue at fullback I'd suggest where being caught sleeping doesnt necessarily mean a strike on goal and pace can get you back with your man.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14101
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: REAM...............? Why?
It's the opposite in my opinionIanmooreslovechild wrote:I havent seen enough of mears to comment but what I have seen he looks ok going forward but suspect defensively.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14101
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: REAM...............? Why?
Plus, if we shoe-horn Ream in at LB, what do we do with Warnock?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: REAM...............? Why?
boltonboris wrote:Heard this a few times.. I don't get it. He shows nothing to suggest that he could provide support in an attacking sense. He wouldn't get past the winger and stick a cross in.. If you think that's okay and that he's only there to do a defensive job etc.. Then people need to get off Mears' back. Because Tyrone is a superior defender (positionally) than anybody else in that squad.Ianmooreslovechild wrote: Have to wait and see I guess. I still think he has the attributes of a good fullback.
Do you keep missing the bits where he f*cks off randomly into central midfield? I ask coz it happens about three times a game. Also, it's no use being in the right position if the next thing you do is go charging into a tackle you are never going to win and give away a cheap free-kick. Constantly. We've been top of fouls conceded and shots on goal this season. There is one reason for that, a £2.5m double buy from Burnley!
I thought Mears was absolute wank at the start of the season, but he has been much, much better recently; however, if he is the best defender positionally in that squad, that says more about the rest of them than it does him! There's only one proper full-back in there, and he isn't ours.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: REAM...............? Why?
We need to find some competitors to fill the midfield up with.....boltonboris wrote:Plus, if we shoe-horn Ream in at LB, what do we do with Warnock?
Though I'm not in favour of Ream being left back, unless it means left back in the bleeding US of A.
We don't have enough competitiors in the team. Warnock is one.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: REAM...............? Why?
Warnock is our left back till he goes. I'm not even saying ream should be starting,I dont think he should. I am saying left back might be a position ream can be more successful in . It's a long term possible solution which is worth trying as we dont have a decent left back except for the one we've borrowed. If warnock is injured or sent off we still need cover and ream is potentially more of a left back than alonsoboltonboris wrote:Plus, if we shoe-horn Ream in at LB, what do we do with Warnock?
Re: REAM...............? Why?
I'd go with OK defensively and suspect going forward thoughboltonboris wrote:It's the opposite in my opinionIanmooreslovechild wrote:I havent seen enough of mears to comment but what I have seen he looks ok going forward but suspect defensively.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: REAM...............? Why?
F*ck me that's damning him with faint praise! Not even is a better left back, only 'potentially'!Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Warnock is our left back till he goes. I'm not even saying ream should be starting,I dont think he should. I am saying left back might be a position ream can be more successful in . It's a long term possible solution which is worth trying as we dont have a decent left back except for the one we've borrowed. If warnock is injured or sent off we still need cover and ream is potentially more of a left back than alonsoboltonboris wrote:Plus, if we shoe-horn Ream in at LB, what do we do with Warnock?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: REAM...............? Why?
I knowPrufrock wrote:F*ck me that's damning him with faint praise! Not even is a better left back, only 'potentially'!Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Warnock is our left back till he goes. I'm not even saying ream should be starting,I dont think he should. I am saying left back might be a position ream can be more successful in . It's a long term possible solution which is worth trying as we dont have a decent left back except for the one we've borrowed. If warnock is injured or sent off we still need cover and ream is potentially more of a left back than alonsoboltonboris wrote:Plus, if we shoe-horn Ream in at LB, what do we do with Warnock?
![Funny :lol:](./images/smilies/laughing.gif)
Cant say he's a better left beck till he plays at left back. Alonso, I can still see playing in midfield,he is way too heavy/slow especially over the first few yards to be playing in the back 4
And no I'm not saying alonso should definitely be starting in midfield,I'm saying he's not a defender and needs trying somewhere else again if we are to avoid accepting another 2 mil has been flushed down the pan.
Re: REAM...............? Why?
I hope we don't buy another yank.
What a waste of wages our current two are.
What a waste of wages our current two are.
Troll and proud of it.
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: REAM...............? Why?
as wrote:He's a wimp.
If he grew a pair of bollocks then maybe he'd make a decent defender, good on the ball but he's frightened of his own shadow.
Burnley away was the gayest performance I've ever seen from a centre back, he was bullied by the much smaller Burnley forwards all game and is only back in the side now coz Knight can't be arsed turning up for games on time.
![Funny :lol:](./images/smilies/laughing.gif)
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: REAM...............? Why?
Is this the reason he's not been seen ?as wrote:Knight can't be arsed turning up for games on time.
Coz if so, fine the fckr but get him back on the pitch ffs.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: REAM...............? Why?
I believe he didn't show up for the Bristol City game until 13:45.
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
Re: REAM...............? Why?
Centre defensive midfield, played just in front of the back four and using his pace to get across and help the full backs
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 202 guests