Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by LeverEnd » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:21 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:I don't get the 'just throw *insert random youngster* in' calls.

I mean I get our first team is shit. But throwing kids in can hurt their progress if not ready and presumably Dougie would be throwing in anyone who was remotely ready at this stage if the options were there.
They aren't random at all. They are specialists in a position in which we are badly short. they have played plenty reserve games and we're in The Championship, not the Champions League.
Fans will not be looking to blame some youngster if he struggles when there are plenty of old pros letting us down.
And I don't go for all that damaging their careers stuff. They should be champing at the bit, and if they can't get over a bad game should they have one, they should grow a pair.
...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:30 pm

LeverEnd wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:I don't get the 'just throw *insert random youngster* in' calls.

I mean I get our first team is shit. But throwing kids in can hurt their progress if not ready and presumably Dougie would be throwing in anyone who was remotely ready at this stage if the options were there.
They aren't random at all. They are specialists in a position in which we are badly short. they have played plenty reserve games and we're in The Championship, not the Champions League.
Fans will not be looking to blame some youngster if he struggles when there are plenty of old pros letting us down.
And I don't go for all that damaging their careers stuff. They should be champing at the bit, and if they can't get over a bad game should they have one, they should grow a pair.
Disagree. If they aren't yet ready they aren't ready. No point throwing em in.

We are talking about lads who have never played a single pro game. I mean I get people are frustrated but rather a manager who protects the longer vision than reacts and makes things worse.

Look at West ham's kids at Forest. It can do damage.

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by jaffka » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:34 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I'm pretty certain his preferred position is centre half. Indeed I'm pretty certain thats the position we signed him to play in.
I don't know what position he prefers but Duggie said he sees him as a full back only.

When I have seen Blackpool on the tv and he played centre half he looked good, maybe it's his height that goes against him :conf:

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by thebish » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:49 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I'm pretty certain his preferred position is centre half. Indeed I'm pretty certain thats the position we signed him to play in.
I'm pretty certain it's not...

DOUGIE Freedman has confirmed that Alex Baptiste will be signed as a right-back, once his move from Blackpool is officially rubber-stamped.

Wanderers fans are waiting anxiously for confirmation of the signing of the 27-year-old defender, who is currently in the final throes of his contract at Bloomfield Road and negotiating a way to link-up with his new club slightly earlier than planned.

Baptiste played in three different positions across the back line for the Seasiders last season but Freedman has rubbished any talk that he arrives at the Reebok as a “utility man.”

“Once everything is sorted, I am signing him as a right-back, 100 per cent,” he told The Bolton News.

“He can play in other positions but I feel that is the position where he would be of best value to the team.”

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:53 pm

I'm still pretty certain that he's a centre half, and that there was some debate when he arrived as to why he was going to fullback. If I could be arsed trawling the internet, I'm sure I'd find it. Someone probably will put it up in due course.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by bobo the clown » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:53 pm

thebish wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:I'm pretty certain his preferred position is centre half. Indeed I'm pretty certain thats the position we signed him to play in.
I'm pretty certain it's not...

DOUGIE Freedman has confirmed that Alex Baptiste will be signed as a right-back, once his move from Blackpool is officially rubber-stamped.

Wanderers fans are waiting anxiously for confirmation of the signing of the 27-year-old defender, who is currently in the final throes of his contract at Bloomfield Road and negotiating a way to link-up with his new club slightly earlier than planned.

Baptiste played in three different positions across the back line for the Seasiders last season but Freedman has rubbished any talk that he arrives at the Reebok as a “utility man.”

“Once everything is sorted, I am signing him as a right-back, 100 per cent,” he told The Bolton News.

“He can play in other positions but I feel that is the position where he would be of best value to the team.”
Centre half it is then !! :lol: :lol:
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
TonyDomingos
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3103
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:27 pm
Location: Sarf East London

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by TonyDomingos » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:00 pm

A friend who's a Blackpool regular was very surprised when Dougie said we'd signed him as right back. He was adamant he was a centre half.
Às armas, às armas!
Sobre a terra, sobre o mar,
Às armas, às armas!
Pela Pátria lutar!
Contra os canhões marchar, marchar!

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by LeverEnd » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:12 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I'm still pretty certain that he's a centre half, and that there was some debate when he arrived as to why he was going to fullback. If I could be arsed trawling the internet, I'm sure I'd find it. Someone probably will put it up in due course.
There was debate because of where fans thought he should play but Dougie made it very clear he was signed to play at RB when he released Ricketts. He's probably wrong about that, but what's new?
...

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by LeverEnd » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:15 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Disagree. If they aren't yet ready they aren't ready. No point throwing em in.

We are talking about lads who have never played a single pro game. I mean I get people are frustrated but rather a manager who protects the longer vision than reacts and makes things worse.

Look at West ham's kids at Forest. It can do damage.
Sometimes you don't know they are ready until you give them the chance. If they have a bad time take them out and train them up a bit more. If they have anything about them they will be spurred on either way.
...

User avatar
Abdoulaye's Twin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Skye high

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by Abdoulaye's Twin » Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:00 am

It seems at our club you can only play a youngster when he is probably past any reasonable definition of a youngster. If a player at the age of 20 is not ready for a few substitute appearances and the odd start for a team in the lower reaches of the Championship, I really question why we're investing a not insignificant sum in developing them. If they aren't ready for that then they're almost certainly going to be on Rochdale's bench in 3 years time. Other clubs seem to be able to play youngsters and we seem to have a couple that have some promise, so lets give them a bit of a chance.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by thebish » Thu Jan 23, 2014 8:57 am

LeverEnd wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Disagree. If they aren't yet ready they aren't ready. No point throwing em in.

We are talking about lads who have never played a single pro game. I mean I get people are frustrated but rather a manager who protects the longer vision than reacts and makes things worse.

Look at West ham's kids at Forest. It can do damage.
Sometimes you don't know they are ready until you give them the chance. If they have a bad time take them out and train them up a bit more. If they have anything about them they will be spurred on either way.
at the start of the season it DID look as if maybe Odelusi and Hall might have a significant role to play... maybe they flattered to deceive and are not as good as we thought - but they did make some impact early on...

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31631
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Thu Jan 23, 2014 8:57 am

Not many people, once calmed down, are saying play an entire team of greenhorns, as West Ham did at Forest. Kids can be seen as a panacea but this is penicillin, to get the provable liability ZK out of the team. I'd be very happy to see us try Baptiste in the middle, where he has played before and received good notices, but the problem is that both Mears and White are right-backs (and White only recently converted there from right-winger). I couldn't tell you whether either has a left foot; to be honest I couldn't pick White out in a crowd. But I do like his surname...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Jan 23, 2014 9:10 am

LeverEnd wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Disagree. If they aren't yet ready they aren't ready. No point throwing em in.

We are talking about lads who have never played a single pro game. I mean I get people are frustrated but rather a manager who protects the longer vision than reacts and makes things worse.

Look at West ham's kids at Forest. It can do damage.
Sometimes you don't know they are ready until you give them the chance. If they have a bad time take them out and train them up a bit more. If they have anything about them they will be spurred on either way.
I think a manager should have a fair idea. I mean we're talking about lads who might be decent one day. I highly doubt we've got the next Wayne Rooney or whatever slumming it in the reserves. I suspect right now any kid we've got would be worse than the first team options. As bad as that might sound and as poor as he is, Knight is a pro who has played hundreds of games, expecting a young kid yet to feature in a first team anywhere to come in and be better is asking a lot in any circumstances. I mean those that watch the reserves have said White has some way to go yet, If I recall correctly. I don't think it is like he is really solidly knocking on the door.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by Prufrock » Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:16 am

Aye West Ham played about 8 at once. We don't want to do that, just give them a chance when we're short in their position!

And Baptistery mainly played at CB for Blackpool, where he looked good. The way it sounded at the time to me was that he fancied himself as a full back, and that was part of the deal whether explicit, or much more likely, not.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:33 am

Prufrock wrote:Aye West Ham played about 8 at once. We don't want to do that, just give them a chance when we're short in their position!

And Baptistery mainly played at CB for Blackpool, where he looked good. The way it sounded at the time to me was that he fancied himself as a full back, and that was part of the deal whether explicit, or much more likely, not.
But being short in a position doesn't mean it is the right thing to throw a kid in. It simply comes down to whether they are a) ready and b) good enough to make the step up at this stage.

I would bet that had we had any youngsters in those brackets they would have been tried in the same way Odelusi/Eaves/Vela etc have been.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by bobo the clown » Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:11 am

These 'kids' aren't 15, are they. They are 19-21. If they were showing real talent they'd be knocking on the door anyway.

He brought Bolger, for example, a year ago. White was playing last season for Sheff Wed. It's hardly 'make or break' for them if they come in and are stretched a bit.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Dr Hotdog
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 5:50 pm
Location: no

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by Dr Hotdog » Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:25 am

bobo the clown wrote: White was playing last season for Sheff Wed.
Incorrect. He never played for Wednesday's first team.

Loyal White
Promising
Promising
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 5:18 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by Loyal White » Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:57 am

officer_dibble wrote:
boltonboris wrote:Just play White. Give him a go.. We'll probably lose anyway, so may aswell see if he's any good
As above.

Kellett?
Last I heard Kellett's injured.

Had a knock yet still played in a reserve game and did some damage.

Not sure when he's due back.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by boltonboris » Thu Jan 23, 2014 12:17 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Has anyone considered Baptiste and Mills at CH and White and Mears at fullback?
4 Right footers though.. Wouldn't work.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Mills & Ream. Or, "buy a full-back, quick!"

Post by boltonboris » Thu Jan 23, 2014 12:24 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Aye West Ham played about 8 at once. We don't want to do that, just give them a chance when we're short in their position!

And Baptistery mainly played at CB for Blackpool, where he looked good. The way it sounded at the time to me was that he fancied himself as a full back, and that was part of the deal whether explicit, or much more likely, not.
But being short in a position doesn't mean it is the right thing to throw a kid in. It simply comes down to whether they are a) ready and b) good enough to make the step up at this stage.
Jesus fvckin Christ.

If they're not ready to oust Zat shitting Knight at this age, they'll never be.

Should we just continue to use the same shocking defenders, playing hopelessly out of position? Ream is a centre back playing at full back, Baptiste is a centre back playing at full back. Knight isn't fit to be anywhere near the squad. Yet you plod along with the shit you spout above because you think the manager is still doing the right thing. NOW is the time for change. Wether that be personnel, or manager. It cannot stay how it is. Which would you prefer? A 19 year old coming in to oust the worst player in the division, or the manager being sacked.. Because that's they way it's going
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: truewhite15 and 34 guests