No Jackett required?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: No Jackett required?
Millwall had Shittu pushing up getting knockdowns late on so I think that was why Dougie brought Knight on.StaffsTrotter wrote:just back.
a win, hurrah. 3 really good well worked, well taken goals.
started off like a train. first 10 minutes - movement, sharp passing, threatening, scored.
and then the wheels slowly came off, all became scrappy and what happened in the first 10 minutes stopped. They came more into it, scored, started to look the better team.
Pretty much against the run of play, Ream advances plays the pass & Beckford finishes well.
2nd half we obviously went into controlling the game without the ball and haneded the intiative to them. Beckford missed a sitter to settle the nerves. Thought Moritz looked good - comfortable on the ball, looks like he can pick a pass and find space. Took his goal well.
Dougie was obviously just toying with us when he brough Zat on - I do wonder what he would be like as a premiership manager - would the team actually get off the bus before it was parked.
All in all, glad of the 3 points, but unconvincing.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
reckon he'll be good for 15 or so, particularly if someone is playing up or just behind him, of the likes of moritz, mavies .Jez wrote:There was a lot of talk about needing a "20 goal man" before this season kicked off, well Beckford scored his 4th in 5 today, anyone else daring to wonder if he might be digging deep for his Leeds form?
observation made around us today, was how we're having to go from a team who just banged it in the general direction of SKD, to one that has to more accurate in sliding those passes to Beckford otherwise theres no point.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
well it certainly sent a few blokes around me in lofthouse lower into apoplexy, about the hanging on mentality it seemed to be signallingChrisC wrote:Millwall had Shittu pushing up getting knockdowns late on so I think that was why Dougie brought Knight on.StaffsTrotter wrote:just back.
a win, hurrah. 3 really good well worked, well taken goals.
started off like a train. first 10 minutes - movement, sharp passing, threatening, scored.
and then the wheels slowly came off, all became scrappy and what happened in the first 10 minutes stopped. They came more into it, scored, started to look the better team.
Pretty much against the run of play, Ream advances plays the pass & Beckford finishes well.
2nd half we obviously went into controlling the game without the ball and haneded the intiative to them. Beckford missed a sitter to settle the nerves. Thought Moritz looked good - comfortable on the ball, looks like he can pick a pass and find space. Took his goal well.
Dougie was obviously just toying with us when he brough Zat on - I do wonder what he would be like as a premiership manager - would the team actually get off the bus before it was parked.
All in all, glad of the 3 points, but unconvincing.
Re: No Jackett required?
And I'm still waving it about...................er..........if anyone's interested...........
.......But not in that pervy sexual way.........................
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3935
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:35 pm
- Location: Swashbucklin in Brooklyn
Re: No Jackett required?
Are you on row q staffs trotter by any chance?
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.
-
- Promising
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:20 pm
- Location: Bolton
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzedBijou Bob wrote:Are you on row q staffs trotter by any chance?
theres a group of blokes must be x & y and I do wonder why the bother - but they have been there since the stadium opened so they must get some strange enjoyment.
problem is I think I'm starting to be assimilated
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
NiceHotCuppaTea wrote:
does anyone else feel a wee bit patronised ? or do we need educating ?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: No Jackett required?
But Jez, Jermaine Beckford has scored five goals this season, each of them coming from him having the ball played to him on the deck, yet when we do this thing whereby we invite teams onto us the out ball is to nice person it up to him in the air. Today he was being towered over by Danny Shittu, a man who had he not made it as a pro footballer might have earned a decent living from playing John Coffey in stage versions of The Green Mile. On the rare occasion that he did manage to get it down there wasn't another white shirt within 2/3rds of the pitch. When we ran at Millwall today we were superb, and yes, maybe Beckford does need three chances to score one but so what? There is enough ability within this set-up to take on all-comers and to constantly feed Beckford in - so why aren't we? I also heard the post match interview that BL3 refers to, and he's absolutely right in his questioning of Freedman's talk of knocking it about at the back - it's not our strength, so why are we doing it? Our strength is taking it to them and feeding Beckford in. He'll recapture his Leeds form, or has, by dint of him receiving the ball in the right way.Jez wrote:There was a lot of talk about needing a "20 goal man" before this season kicked off, well Beckford scored his 4th in 5 today, anyone else daring to wonder if he might be digging deep for his Leeds form?
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: No Jackett required?
The fans were shouting "Knock it forward, get it up to the big man"? WHAT?????StaffsTrotter wrote: does anyone else feel a wee bit patronised ? or do we need educating ?
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
I thought they were shouting for a bit a of urgency, movement and passing, rather than the slow knocking around between our defender/ CMs and then the forward punt. Perhaps its the accentBruce Rioja wrote:The fans were shouting "Knock it forward, get it up to the big man"? WHAT?????StaffsTrotter wrote: does anyone else feel a wee bit patronised ? or do we need educating ?
Re: No Jackett required?
AT, I do totally look like a stretched out version of Corbett.Bruce Rioja wrote:See, I have TKIZ down as being tall, thin and with scruffy brown hair that needs cutting.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Amazing. You know how you have a mental picture of what people look like. I always figured you for a Corbett looky-likeyTKIZ! wrote: me look like Ronnie Corbett
(I apply that description to BWFC-I, too).
BR, you are quite close to how I look.
Pfffft.
Re: No Jackett required?
Life can be so unfairTKIZ! wrote:AT, I do totally look like a stretched out version of Corbett.Bruce Rioja wrote:See, I have TKIZ down as being tall, thin and with scruffy brown hair that needs cutting.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Amazing. You know how you have a mental picture of what people look like. I always figured you for a Corbett looky-likeyTKIZ! wrote: me look like Ronnie Corbett
(I apply that description to BWFC-I, too).
BR, you are quite close to how I look.
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Re: No Jackett required?
And I support BWFC as well, double whammyjaffka wrote:Life can be so unfairTKIZ! wrote:AT, I do totally look like a stretched out version of Corbett.Bruce Rioja wrote:See, I have TKIZ down as being tall, thin and with scruffy brown hair that needs cutting.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Amazing. You know how you have a mental picture of what people look like. I always figured you for a Corbett looky-likeyTKIZ! wrote: me look like Ronnie Corbett
(I apply that description to BWFC-I, too).
BR, you are quite close to how I look.
![Funny :lol:](./images/smilies/laughing.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Pfffft.
Re: No Jackett required?
And I support BWFC as well, double whammyTKIZ! wrote:Life can be so unfair
![Funny :lol:](./images/smilies/laughing.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Funny :lol:](./images/smilies/laughing.gif)
This guarantees your entry into heaven though, ask thebish
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: No Jackett required?
Many good things about today. Three excellent goals. Beckford looking good when not yapping at the ref. Centre backs having a vg game - Mills his best so far, imo, Ream playing very well (though i wish we had another centre back to release him for the holding position).
Frustration when we play so well, score, then go into frightened mode and invite them back into the game. There was no surprise when they equalised. It's what we do.
But nice to leave the Reebok happy.![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Frustration when we play so well, score, then go into frightened mode and invite them back into the game. There was no surprise when they equalised. It's what we do.
But nice to leave the Reebok happy.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: No Jackett required?
by the way everyone ... #41, on the bench ... Oscar Threlkeld.
Anyone know about the guy ?
Anyone know about the guy ?
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: No Jackett required?
New one on me. Did N'gog and Eagles make the bench? I missed the bench bit apart from knowing Knight, Moritz and Craig Davis came on.bobo the clown wrote:by the way everyone ... #41, on the bench ... Oscar Threlkeld.
Anyone know about the guy ?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: No Jackett required?
TANGODANCER wrote:New one on me. Did N'gog and Eagles make the bench? I missed the bench bit apart from knowing Knight, Moritz and Craig Davis came on.bobo the clown wrote:by the way everyone ... #41, on the bench ... Oscar Threlkeld.
Anyone know about the guy ?
Indeed they did. Very attacking bench. Lots of options.
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
Lee-Barrett, Knight, Moritz, Craig Davies, Ngog, Eagles and Threlkeld was the bench.TANGODANCER wrote:New one on me. Did N'gog and Eagles make the bench? I missed the bench bit apart from knowing Knight, Moritz and Craig Davis came on.bobo the clown wrote:by the way everyone ... #41, on the bench ... Oscar Threlkeld.
Anyone know about the guy ?
Threlkeld is a name that was vaguely familiar. One of those who seems to have been around our youth team so long that they might be 30-odd. Centre-back, if I recall correctly.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], knobpolisher and 150 guests