Which muppet can we appoint next?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14101
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
It wasn't ironic, he halfheartedly closed down, got turned inside out and they created bags of space for a shot..
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
I know a few in Fleetwood, and the owner is rich & his money certainly isn't running out - the issue with Fleetwood is apparently FFP restricting the amount of money the owner can spend on players.jonnycooper wrote:Have,nt heard a peep about this,but I,ll speak to a coach there before the day,s out,don't know about cash running out,the fecker (owner) is just getting richer by the week!Bijou Bob wrote:I work in Fleetwood and live just down the road, so it'll be a couple of short trips for me next year. I had heard that the money was starting to run out at FT?
On another note, I saw Ched Evans in Fleetwood last week and this adds on to a rumour I heard from a neighbour who claims to be in the know, that he's training with the club at the moment on the very QT.
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9131
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
Aye, cheers Peter because a 0-0 draw was just what we wanted in our mid table positionDr Hotdog wrote:Quote from Phillips in the BN:
“I was going to give young Alex the last 10 minutes but Peter Reid – quite rightly as well – said that Reading were looking to put more balls into the box, particularly at set plays and big Emile (Heskey) was a real asset in defending them.
“It was just ironic that as soon as we got him on the pitch we concede to a great strike.”
Nice one Peter!
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
Shocking decision IMO to put Heskey on, and shows exactly why Phillips should not be anywhere near the managers job full time - we need a much stronger manager who won't be swayed so easily by a comment from an assistant.Gary the Enfield wrote:Dr Hotdog wrote:Quote from Phillips in the BN:
“I was going to give young Alex the last 10 minutes but Peter Reid – quite rightly as well – said that Reading were looking to put more balls into the box, particularly at set plays and big Emile (Heskey) was a real asset in defending them.
“It was just ironic that as soon as we got him on the pitch we concede to a great strike.”
Nice one Peter!
Reid Out!
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9288
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
To be fair we were crying out for our last 3 managers to listen to someone. Lets see if Jimmy learns from it - now that would be a noveltyPeter Thompson wrote:Shocking decision IMO to put Heskey on, and shows exactly why Phillips should not be anywhere near the managers job full time - we need a much stronger manager who won't be swayed so easily by a comment from an assistant.Gary the Enfield wrote:Dr Hotdog wrote:Quote from Phillips in the BN:
“I was going to give young Alex the last 10 minutes but Peter Reid – quite rightly as well – said that Reading were looking to put more balls into the box, particularly at set plays and big Emile (Heskey) was a real asset in defending them.
“It was just ironic that as soon as we got him on the pitch we concede to a great strike.”
Nice one Peter!
Reid Out!
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
There is absolutely nothing wrong with listening to the opinion of your assistant or anyone else - however the 'informed decisions' have to be the right ones more often than not....and IMO this was not, trying to protect a 0-0 draw at home when already relegated, when trying to give the supporters something different to the previous manager and showing them that you are at least a little competent - to me does not mean bringing on Heskey - not so he could get us a goal (as we don't even try to attack anymore) but just so that he can defend better than the other mon is shocking.throwawayboltonian wrote:But to provide a counter-argument (I don't want JP as full time manager either for the record) isn't that an assistant's job? To provide his insight and advice for the manager to weigh up, then make an informed decision. Maybe that's what JP did, as much as we disagree with it. I wouldn't say that making or changing a decision following advice from your #2 is necessarily a weak trait. We had a "strong" manager in Lennon and that didn't serve us well.Peter Thompson wrote: Shocking decision IMO to put Heskey on, and shows exactly why Phillips should not be anywhere near the managers job full time - we need a much stronger manager who won't be swayed so easily by a comment from an assistant.
He could have listened to Reid & said I take on board what you are saying, but Heskey's leaving at the end of the season and our defenders 'should' be able to cope with any long balls in the box - all things considered I need to try the kids and I'd rather give young Alex a few minutes instead of that lump Heskey, he's been warming up for 15 mins now and is keen as mustard and it will be good experience for him, and you never know he may actually get over the half way line and have a shot as I bet the Reading keeper's hands are freezing as he's not touched the ball all game !
- irie Cee Bee
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1150
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:55 am
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
When I read JPs comment after the game it was clear to me that he is not the man for the job fulltime. He was either throwing Reid under the bus because the Heskey change backfired, or was too weak to stand by his own decision. Either way, not what we want from a manager.Peter Thompson wrote:There is absolutely nothing wrong with listening to the opinion of your assistant or anyone else - however the 'informed decisions' have to be the right ones more often than not....and IMO this was not, trying to protect a 0-0 draw at home when already relegated, when trying to give the supporters something different to the previous manager and showing them that you are at least a little competent - to me does not mean bringing on Heskey - not so he could get us a goal (as we don't even try to attack anymore) but just so that he can defend better than the other mon is shocking.throwawayboltonian wrote:But to provide a counter-argument (I don't want JP as full time manager either for the record) isn't that an assistant's job? To provide his insight and advice for the manager to weigh up, then make an informed decision. Maybe that's what JP did, as much as we disagree with it. I wouldn't say that making or changing a decision following advice from your #2 is necessarily a weak trait. We had a "strong" manager in Lennon and that didn't serve us well.Peter Thompson wrote: Shocking decision IMO to put Heskey on, and shows exactly why Phillips should not be anywhere near the managers job full time - we need a much stronger manager who won't be swayed so easily by a comment from an assistant.
He could have listened to Reid & said I take on board what you are saying, but Heskey's leaving at the end of the season and our defenders 'should' be able to cope with any long balls in the box - all things considered I need to try the kids and I'd rather give young Alex a few minutes instead of that lump Heskey, he's been warming up for 15 mins now and is keen as mustard and it will be good experience for him, and you never know he may actually get over the half way line and have a shot as I bet the Reading keeper's hands are freezing as he's not touched the ball all game !
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9288
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
Or he took the advice of a far more experienced manager that was brought in for the purpose of helping him. Not saying Jimmy is the man for the job, but all he's done is listen to someone with more experience. Important thing is he learns to trust his own instincts at the right time.irie Cee Bee wrote:When I read JPs comment after the game it was clear to me that he is not the man for the job fulltime. He was either throwing Reid under the bus because the Heskey change backfired, or was too weak to stand by his own decision. Either way, not what we want from a manager.Peter Thompson wrote:There is absolutely nothing wrong with listening to the opinion of your assistant or anyone else - however the 'informed decisions' have to be the right ones more often than not....and IMO this was not, trying to protect a 0-0 draw at home when already relegated, when trying to give the supporters something different to the previous manager and showing them that you are at least a little competent - to me does not mean bringing on Heskey - not so he could get us a goal (as we don't even try to attack anymore) but just so that he can defend better than the other mon is shocking.throwawayboltonian wrote:But to provide a counter-argument (I don't want JP as full time manager either for the record) isn't that an assistant's job? To provide his insight and advice for the manager to weigh up, then make an informed decision. Maybe that's what JP did, as much as we disagree with it. I wouldn't say that making or changing a decision following advice from your #2 is necessarily a weak trait. We had a "strong" manager in Lennon and that didn't serve us well.Peter Thompson wrote: Shocking decision IMO to put Heskey on, and shows exactly why Phillips should not be anywhere near the managers job full time - we need a much stronger manager who won't be swayed so easily by a comment from an assistant.
He could have listened to Reid & said I take on board what you are saying, but Heskey's leaving at the end of the season and our defenders 'should' be able to cope with any long balls in the box - all things considered I need to try the kids and I'd rather give young Alex a few minutes instead of that lump Heskey, he's been warming up for 15 mins now and is keen as mustard and it will be good experience for him, and you never know he may actually get over the half way line and have a shot as I bet the Reading keeper's hands are freezing as he's not touched the ball all game !
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
i think his mistake is simply telling us about it... it's all chance and forture - had heskey scored the winner - and JP had let us knolw he took Reid's advice - we'd all be on here saying what a great trait it is of a manager to listen to advice...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
If the result mattered how many managers would bring on a 5ft midget who has never played in the first team before ahead of a 6ft plus experienced target man?
I mean in the situation we might as well have had a look at Samizadeh. But Heskey was the percentage move to try and hang on to a 0-0 for the reasons Phillips outlined. Better aerially defensively more able to hold the ball in theory.
But it was odd to even care about trying to hang on to a 0-0 in our position.
I mean in the situation we might as well have had a look at Samizadeh. But Heskey was the percentage move to try and hang on to a 0-0 for the reasons Phillips outlined. Better aerially defensively more able to hold the ball in theory.
But it was odd to even care about trying to hang on to a 0-0 in our position.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14101
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
thebish wrote: had heskey scored the winner
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14101
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
feck defending for the last 5 minutes at 0-0 at home - A draw makes no difference - A win keeps the wolf from the door for another week or 2..
I'd bet my house that in 20 games, young Alex would get 3 times the goals Heskey would
I'd bet my house that in 20 games, young Alex would get 3 times the goals Heskey would
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14101
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
Definitely odd - I agree with everything you've said expect for Heskey being able to hold the ball (in theory).. He couldn't hold an apple in both hands.BWFC_Insane wrote:If the result mattered how many managers would bring on a 5ft midget who has never played in the first team before ahead of a 6ft plus experienced target man?
I mean in the situation we might as well have had a look at Samizadeh. But Heskey was the percentage move to try and hang on to a 0-0 for the reasons Phillips outlined. Better aerially defensively more able to hold the ball in theory.
But it was odd to even care about trying to hang on to a 0-0 in our position.
Heskey weakens us defensively, as nothing sticks, he can't even run to pressurise defenders. He needs it at his feet, slowly, but even then it'll bounce off, or he'll fall over
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
boltonboris wrote:thebish wrote: had heskey scored the winner
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
I'd have thought the young lad would've been a spectator on the halfway line as we were doing nothing up front or in mdifield. I agree that he's more liekly to bury a chance than Heskey but doubt he'd have got one. Obviously a point is worth feck all in keeping us up, but nor is 3. They were never going to get 3, but a draw would have given them something to cling to confidence wise, however small.
Subbing Alex S instead of EH would've made no difference either to the nil that we got or the one that they got. Never seen Jimmy as manager, but this makes no odds either way to me.
Subbing Alex S instead of EH would've made no difference either to the nil that we got or the one that they got. Never seen Jimmy as manager, but this makes no odds either way to me.
...
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
"Get rid of Lennon, stick Jimmy Phillips in instead. Things can't get any worse."
Businesswoman of the year.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
"Give the kids a chance. Things can't get any worse."
Businesswoman of the year.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
Businesswoman of the year.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Which muppet can we appoint next?
They're not actually getting any worse! At least we can see now that next season's going to be a fecking disaster as well. You know, gets all this ridiculous optimism out of the way good and early.CrazyHorse wrote:"Give the kids a chance. Things can't get any worse."
May the bridges I burn light your way
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 177 guests