The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Locked
norm the jedi
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
Location: Near a Shandy
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by norm the jedi » Fri Aug 02, 2013 4:59 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:I think that sounds more like one out, one in. I just worry as time goes by that if we succeed getting those two out, well then what happens if one or both of our replacement targets decline the move? If we're already not good enough, I suppose it doesn't matter, but I can't see it improving things. Mills I'm not arsed about, but centre mid is looking light.
I fully agree. Bet Dougie does too from what he's said. But as with needing to get Charlton to pay some of Sordell's wages before we took on Moritz, harsh reality is that unless Eddie fancies doing us a favour, pot seems to be empty. And as Dougie said we have a lot of very highly paid players who might not play much, but as they are highly paid its hard to get someone to take them.
So if they aren't any use to us and no one will touch em elsewhere why is football still the only place where you can hang around like a bad smell and keep picking up your wage... Even when the entire market knows you're not worth it...?
Any other line of work , step into my office... Get fooked off and don't let that door hit you in the arse on yer way out...
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by bwfcdan94 » Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:15 pm

Not to pick on Arsenal again but I have heard that Bendtner and Chamach are still stealing a living
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by TKIZ! » Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:16 pm

I'd suggest that Charlton would be paying at least half his wages and don't forget that the US football federation are picking up Holden's wages.
Pfffft.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:23 pm

norm the jedi wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:I think that sounds more like one out, one in. I just worry as time goes by that if we succeed getting those two out, well then what happens if one or both of our replacement targets decline the move? If we're already not good enough, I suppose it doesn't matter, but I can't see it improving things. Mills I'm not arsed about, but centre mid is looking light.
I fully agree. Bet Dougie does too from what he's said. But as with needing to get Charlton to pay some of Sordell's wages before we took on Moritz, harsh reality is that unless Eddie fancies doing us a favour, pot seems to be empty. And as Dougie said we have a lot of very highly paid players who might not play much, but as they are highly paid its hard to get someone to take them.
So if they aren't any use to us and no one will touch em elsewhere why is football still the only place where you can hang around like a bad smell and keep picking up your wage... Even when the entire market knows you're not worth it...?
Any other line of work , step into my office... Get fooked off and don't let that door hit you in the arse on yer way out...
If only......to be ever so slightly fair it is a short career and whilst clubs are all stupid for paying them as much as they do, I guess clubs can only respond to the market.

Other thing is that being able to rip up contracts would probably hurt the players at the lower end of the game than it would nearer the top.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by bobo the clown » Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:31 pm

You CAN rip up their contract. Just that it will cost you.

You CAN sack them if they do something judged to be gross misconduct, but that's rare.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:34 pm

bobo the clown wrote:You CAN rip up their contract. Just that it will cost you.

You CAN sack them if they do something judged to be gross misconduct, but that's rare.
As Ashley Cole can testify....

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:38 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote: I think Blackpool made an approach for them on loan. Dougies eyes lit up thinking he could shift em and bring in Spearing and a better CB with the money saved.
Didn't Dougie say he hasn't spoken to Ince in three months?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:50 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote: I think Blackpool made an approach for them on loan. Dougies eyes lit up thinking he could shift em and bring in Spearing and a better CB with the money saved.
Didn't Dougie say he hasn't spoken to Ince in three months?
Doesn't mean there wasn't an approach.......

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by officer_dibble » Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:57 pm

I imagine Oyston does not let paul ince anywhere near a transfer deal!

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Aug 02, 2013 6:19 pm

Said similar at the fans forum, but again in the BN today.

Get the feeling Dougie is a little concerned by what others are doing.
Freedman is having to balance his books at present as the whole division gets to grips with the potential pitfalls of Financial Fair Play.

But the manager has warned the money being spent by promotion rivals such as QPR could potentially give them a head start in this season’s Championship.

“The Wigans, QPRs and Nottingham Forests are strengthening, so we have to be careful we don’t get too far behind them in our points or the transfer market,” he added.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by thebish » Fri Aug 02, 2013 7:25 pm

how come we're slowed by FFP - but QPR are not??

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by bwfcdan94 » Fri Aug 02, 2013 7:29 pm

Arry has a taxman who cant do lots with figures and he has an accountant friend who can do the same...
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Aug 02, 2013 7:43 pm

thebish wrote:how come we're slowed by FFP - but QPR are not??
FFP is about spending relative to income. So QPR have the larger parachute payment. And they've been able to shift Samba for £12M giving them income they can spend.

Similar with Wigan. Spent the Kone fee. Plus a larger parachute payment.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by thebish » Fri Aug 02, 2013 7:50 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:how come we're slowed by FFP - but QPR are not??
FFP is about spending relative to income. So QPR have the larger parachute payment. And they've been able to shift Samba for £12M giving them income they can spend.

Similar with Wigan. Spent the Kone fee. Plus a larger parachute payment.
ahhh... bugger!

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Aug 02, 2013 7:56 pm

Hang on - aren't the initial parachute payments spread over 3 yeras?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:00 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Hang on - aren't the initial parachute payments spread over 3 yeras?
Yep, always are.

So we got 16M last year, 16M this year and 8M next year.

Whereas QPR, Reading and Wigan get 23M this year and next....plus whatever it goes down to after that.

So 7M extra quid a year in their budgets.
Last edited by BWFC_Insane on Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:02 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Hang on - aren't the initial parachute payments spread over 3 yeras?
Only if you have a finger in the pie.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

mrpiccollo
Promising
Promising
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:00 am

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by mrpiccollo » Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:27 pm

you are forgetting we now have a good squad for this division with experience of this division and the other 2 just dropped down and as far as qpr go are likely in massive debt if they arent straight back up (massive pressure on players who 80% of wont have a clue about the championship and wigan who i am in no doubt will settle mid table and do no more)
Image
Image

Il Pirate
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:27 pm
Location: Isle of Wight

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Il Pirate » Fri Aug 02, 2013 9:08 pm

and England favourite :conf: :conf:


feck off

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by thebish » Fri Aug 02, 2013 9:10 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Hang on - aren't the initial parachute payments spread over 3 yeras?
Yep, always are.

So we got 16M last year, 16M this year and 8M next year.

Whereas QPR, Reading and Wigan get 23M this year and next....plus whatever it goes down to after that.

So 7M extra quid a year in their budgets.

surely that doesn't go far - that dog of harry's eats a lot of biscuits... :wink:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], irie Cee Bee and 31 guests