The Tykes Thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36440
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:34 am

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote: Think I said before I probably did overestimate the quality of our squad though I still think we are somewhat underperforming.

why are we underperforming? (previously you said that is 100% down to the manager..)
I think it was.

As I said there is demonstrable improvement since the manager left, so that was certainly a factor.

But to be fair I think its evident the balance of the squad isn't right. That can't be fixed quickly.

The fitness will also take longer to fix.

The organisation is definitely better already.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:45 am

truewhite15 wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote: Think I said before I probably did overestimate the quality of our squad though I still think we are somewhat underperforming.

why are we underperforming? (previously you said that is 100% down to the manager..)
We're under performing because for about 80% of the match, the vast majority of our players can't be arsed. And I'm looking particularly at Eagles here. They have the quality to win games in this division, and to get into the playoffs even at this late stage. But they cannot be bothered putting the effort in to get there. That was painfully obvious against Barnsley. Too many times, Barnsley had the ball, and were just passing at around. Our players didn't bother closing them down; essentially an attitude of "meh, we'll get it back eventually". Similarly when we had the ball, there was no urgency on the counter attack (the goal aside). It wasn't helped by a piss-poor referee that didn't have a fecking clue when to let play go and when to blow the whistle, but our players have an attitude problem that prevents them playing at 100% for 90 minutes; they think they're gonna walk the game before they even step out.

It's a problem that pervades into, or possibly began with, the fans. I'm looking at those that booed when Andrews came on, and those that whinge and whine when we build up slowly, and then those that whinge and whine when we boot it long. We need fight and bottle in this league, and the best teams generally have an imposing, intimidating atmosphere when they play at home. I know these things are sort of a symbiotic relationship (the crowd responds to the players, the players respond to the fans) but there's a definite lack of the battling, underdog, us-against-the-world mentality that made us great in the Premier League, and made us great before then when we were going up.

I miss Big Sam.
Look all you like

My perception is that Eagles is our hardest working player

I'd guess he does as many yards as anybody and much of it at a sprint

he may be a soft bastard, but he is not fcuking lazy
Sto ut Serviam

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:07 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote: Think I said before I probably did overestimate the quality of our squad though I still think we are somewhat underperforming.

why are we underperforming? (previously you said that is 100% down to the manager..)
I think it was.

As I said there is demonstrable improvement since the manager left, so that was certainly a factor.

I think I might have a different meaning in mind for the word "underperforming"

if someone says to me that a player is underperforming - then it means (to me) that the player is not playing to his full ability.

I have heard people who go to the games say that the players are not battling and don't look as if they care enough...
to me - that's different to saying they are unfit or not organised well - it's an attitude thing...

I don't know how you'd measure how organised we are - people who go to the games are saying that we still play players (Ngog) out of position (to the exclusion of players who CAN play there) which leads to us (effectively) playing with ten men... what are the signs that we are more organised - specifically?

fitness - granted - there is a legacy of unfitness that will take dougie time to fix

but - organisation and motivation - why is that such a long-term job? (unless these players are unmotivatable and impossible to organise and we need to rebuild again with dougie's choices...)

if the players are still underperforming - than some of that is down to him, surely?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36440
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:09 am

Aye I don't think Eagles is lazy.

He is frustrating though. Makes things happen but in general too often his final ball, cross or shot is poor and a lot of the time he makes the wrong decision.

Dougie needs to work on our delivery into the box because its wank. Especially from corners and free kicks.

We need to make far more of those than we are doing.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24103
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:12 am

Aye Eagles isn't lazy. I do remember when we signed Tuncay a Stoke fan said he'd go chasing mad things all the way back to the keeper to look good but then be out of positionn and I do think there is a bit of that about Eagles though.

Chungy needs his head sorting, and properly. Bottled at least one that was 60-40 in his favour. Not blaming him, but he's no use to us at the moment. Shrink job.

And yet again I wonder why large parts of our fanbase even bother going. I think they've taken to enjoying hating it. Constant whinging and shouting. Booing Andrews when he came on, booing at full-time. We didn't even lose! It wasn't great, but if that is the booing standard then jeez. I swear they only go to boo, they'd be lost if we played well. It's like pish comedians who swear all the time, it loses its effect. The wankers.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

89bwfc89
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1176
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 2:45 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by 89bwfc89 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:20 am

Tombwfc wrote:Talk of going unbeaten is pretty meaningless. Fair enough if we're fighting for survival in the Premier League and most teams get 0 points a week, but when we're aiming for 1.86 ppg (for 75 points and the playoffs), wins are pretty much all that count. If you don't win, that number goes up.

If you can't expect us to beat Barnsley, who can you expect us to beat? Presumably only the spoilt and deluded would expect us to win away at Brighton or Blackburn, so that's another two games where the target will be drifting further and further away.

Dougie can have all the time in the world for me, but there's no point pretending there were any positive signs yesterday. There just weren't.

It's been said numerous times before that we can't expect to beat anybody in this league.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36440
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:21 am

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote: Think I said before I probably did overestimate the quality of our squad though I still think we are somewhat underperforming.

why are we underperforming? (previously you said that is 100% down to the manager..)
I think it was.

As I said there is demonstrable improvement since the manager left, so that was certainly a factor.

I think I might have a different meaning in mind for the word "underperforming"

if someone says to me that a player is underperforming - then it means (to me) that the player is not playing to his full ability.

I have heard people who go to the games say that the players are not battling and don't look as if they care enough...
to me - that's different to saying they are unfit or not organised well - it's an attitude thing...

I don't know how you'd measure how organised we are - people who go to the games are saying that we still play players (Ngog) out of position (to the exclusion of players who CAN play there) which leads to us (effectively) playing with ten men... what are the signs that we are more organised - specifically?

fitness - granted - there is a legacy of unfitness that will take dougie time to fix

but - organisation and motivation - why is that such a long-term job? (unless these players are unmotivatable and impossible to organise and we need to rebuild again with dougie's choices...)

if the players are still underperforming - than some of that is down to him, surely?
Bish, in terms of what we are doing off the ball its night and day to what happened previously.

We aren't being walked through because we have a shape defensively that appears to be working and players seem to know what they should be doing.

When we lose the ball we get our shape very quickly. Its noticeably better and its why we defend better.

I'd say we are infinitely better organised than we previously were. In the last two games we've given precious few clear cut chances away. The goals conceded were two long rangers and one piece of poor defending from a free kick. But in open play its far less nervewracking as we look more solid and less likely to concede a goal at any moment. I don't think it takes a lot to convert either performance into a clean sheet. I really don't.

I'm not sure its as easy to sort out the underperformance so quickly as you might suggest. I suspect that we are a key ingredient or two away in the squad. I think any manager coming in had to first make us more solid, then move onto other areas.

In terms of motivation, I don't think thats an easy sort out either. I think people think of motivation as the manager standing in the dressing room reciting Jerusalem. But the players have to want to play, they have to be a united group and have to want to fight. Perhaps we've a few too many who don't want to do that. Dougie may well turn some of them round, but may want a few characters he has picked to help us along the way. We don't have many leaders on the pitch, that is for sure.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14101
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by boltonboris » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:23 am

All of the above is true (re: defensive shape), but we've become so rigid and at times, so deep that we don't look like being able to go the other way and win the game.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:25 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
In terms of motivation, I don't think thats an easy sort out either. I think people think of motivation as the manager standing in the dressing room reciting Jerusalem. But the players have to want to play, they have to be a united group and have to want to fight. Perhaps we've a few too many who don't want to do that. Dougie may well turn some of them round, but may want a few characters he has picked to help us along the way. We don't have many leaders on the pitch, that is for sure.
i think this has been a problem for a while - I don't really think KD does that job very well... I kind of get the impression that none of them are sure enough of themselves to be able to inspire/motivate others... they all seem to be a bit scared/insecure...

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by BL3 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:29 am

Tombwfc wrote:Talk of going unbeaten is pretty meaningless. Fair enough if we're fighting for survival in the Premier League and most teams get 0 points a week, but when we're aiming for 1.86 ppg (for 75 points and the playoffs), wins are pretty much all that count. If you don't win, that number goes up.

If you can't expect us to beat Barnsley, who can you expect us to beat? Presumably only the spoilt and deluded would expect us to win away at Brighton or Blackburn, so that's another two games where the target will be drifting further and further away.

Dougie can have all the time in the world for me, but there's no point pretending there were any positive signs yesterday. There just weren't.
Absolutely spot on. Unbeaten runs are irrelevant if it's just one draw after another. We won't be promoted by picking up three points every three games. Better to win two, lose one. In the last four games we've taken as many points as Ipswich and they've lost two of those 5-0 and 6-0.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36440
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:33 am

BL3 wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:Talk of going unbeaten is pretty meaningless. Fair enough if we're fighting for survival in the Premier League and most teams get 0 points a week, but when we're aiming for 1.86 ppg (for 75 points and the playoffs), wins are pretty much all that count. If you don't win, that number goes up.

If you can't expect us to beat Barnsley, who can you expect us to beat? Presumably only the spoilt and deluded would expect us to win away at Brighton or Blackburn, so that's another two games where the target will be drifting further and further away.

Dougie can have all the time in the world for me, but there's no point pretending there were any positive signs yesterday. There just weren't.
Absolutely spot on. Unbeaten runs are irrelevant if it's just one draw after another. We won't be promoted by picking up three points every three games. Better to win two, lose one. In the last four games we've taken as many points as Ipswich and they've lost two of those 5-0 and 6-0.
But we're still taking more than the 1ppg we were under the previous manager.

So better than that surely?

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:50 am

BL3 wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:Talk of going unbeaten is pretty meaningless. Fair enough if we're fighting for survival in the Premier League and most teams get 0 points a week, but when we're aiming for 1.86 ppg (for 75 points and the playoffs), wins are pretty much all that count. If you don't win, that number goes up.

If you can't expect us to beat Barnsley, who can you expect us to beat? Presumably only the spoilt and deluded would expect us to win away at Brighton or Blackburn, so that's another two games where the target will be drifting further and further away.

Dougie can have all the time in the world for me, but there's no point pretending there were any positive signs yesterday. There just weren't.
Absolutely spot on. Unbeaten runs are irrelevant if it's just one draw after another. We won't be promoted by picking up three points every three games. Better to win two, lose one. In the last four games we've taken as many points as Ipswich and they've lost two of those 5-0 and 6-0.
BL3 can't believe your still fvcking harping on

It's been 4 fvcking games

Don't you think he deserves abit more time

6 games at least
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24103
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:52 am

He's had four games and we still aren't top! Wtf?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by BL3 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:57 am

plymouth wanderer wrote:
BL3 wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:Talk of going unbeaten is pretty meaningless. Fair enough if we're fighting for survival in the Premier League and most teams get 0 points a week, but when we're aiming for 1.86 ppg (for 75 points and the playoffs), wins are pretty much all that count. If you don't win, that number goes up.

If you can't expect us to beat Barnsley, who can you expect us to beat? Presumably only the spoilt and deluded would expect us to win away at Brighton or Blackburn, so that's another two games where the target will be drifting further and further away.

Dougie can have all the time in the world for me, but there's no point pretending there were any positive signs yesterday. There just weren't.
Absolutely spot on. Unbeaten runs are irrelevant if it's just one draw after another. We won't be promoted by picking up three points every three games. Better to win two, lose one. In the last four games we've taken as many points as Ipswich and they've lost two of those 5-0 and 6-0.
BL3 can't believe your still fvcking harping on

It's been 4 fvcking games

Don't you think he deserves abit more time

6 games at least
Four games is long enough to work out that N'gog isn't a winger.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36440
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:59 am

BL3 wrote:
plymouth wanderer wrote:
BL3 wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:Talk of going unbeaten is pretty meaningless. Fair enough if we're fighting for survival in the Premier League and most teams get 0 points a week, but when we're aiming for 1.86 ppg (for 75 points and the playoffs), wins are pretty much all that count. If you don't win, that number goes up.

If you can't expect us to beat Barnsley, who can you expect us to beat? Presumably only the spoilt and deluded would expect us to win away at Brighton or Blackburn, so that's another two games where the target will be drifting further and further away.

Dougie can have all the time in the world for me, but there's no point pretending there were any positive signs yesterday. There just weren't.
Absolutely spot on. Unbeaten runs are irrelevant if it's just one draw after another. We won't be promoted by picking up three points every three games. Better to win two, lose one. In the last four games we've taken as many points as Ipswich and they've lost two of those 5-0 and 6-0.
BL3 can't believe your still fvcking harping on

It's been 4 fvcking games

Don't you think he deserves abit more time

6 games at least
Four games is long enough to work out that N'gog isn't a winger.
Neither is Kevin Davies, he still played out there for several games during our most successful period in the past 50 years.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14101
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by boltonboris » Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:00 pm

I think it's fair to say the old bloke would be getting pelters if he played that line up..
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24103
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:03 pm

boltonboris wrote:All of the above is true (re: defensive shape), but we've become so rigid and at times, so deep that we don't look like being able to go the other way and win the game.
I don't think we look any less likely to score than we did under Coyle. One of the fallacies of his time this season is that while we were shit at the back we at least played attacking football. There was no fluidity, no creativity, no discernable game plan. I thought we created enough chances on Saturday to win the game. We had four, five, maybe more efforts from about twenty yards that were right down their keeper's throat. You might not expect to score every one from that range, but we didn't do enough.

Re: Davo's goal, I've only seen it live, but to dismiss it as easy as some seem seems very one-eyed. Was a very good touch and a good finish. Far from 'easy'. On the other hand he had showed Pratley like levels of awareness earlier as one rebounded off his shin in the six yard box. I thought he had a poor game overall, but ho took his goal very well.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:04 pm

BL3 wrote:
plymouth wanderer wrote:
BL3 wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:Talk of going unbeaten is pretty meaningless. Fair enough if we're fighting for survival in the Premier League and most teams get 0 points a week, but when we're aiming for 1.86 ppg (for 75 points and the playoffs), wins are pretty much all that count. If you don't win, that number goes up.

If you can't expect us to beat Barnsley, who can you expect us to beat? Presumably only the spoilt and deluded would expect us to win away at Brighton or Blackburn, so that's another two games where the target will be drifting further and further away.

Dougie can have all the time in the world for me, but there's no point pretending there were any positive signs yesterday. There just weren't.
Absolutely spot on. Unbeaten runs are irrelevant if it's just one draw after another. We won't be promoted by picking up three points every three games. Better to win two, lose one. In the last four games we've taken as many points as Ipswich and they've lost two of those 5-0 and 6-0.
BL3 can't believe your still fvcking harping on

It's been 4 fvcking games

Don't you think he deserves abit more time

6 games at least
Four games is long enough to work out that N'gog isn't a winger.

Errr 1 game he's played on the wing not the four you keep harping on about

I can forgive DF for looking at all his options

But i suppose you've made up your mind so let's just sack him
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24103
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:07 pm

BL3 wrote:
plymouth wanderer wrote:
BL3 wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:Talk of going unbeaten is pretty meaningless. Fair enough if we're fighting for survival in the Premier League and most teams get 0 points a week, but when we're aiming for 1.86 ppg (for 75 points and the playoffs), wins are pretty much all that count. If you don't win, that number goes up.

If you can't expect us to beat Barnsley, who can you expect us to beat? Presumably only the spoilt and deluded would expect us to win away at Brighton or Blackburn, so that's another two games where the target will be drifting further and further away.

Dougie can have all the time in the world for me, but there's no point pretending there were any positive signs yesterday. There just weren't.
Absolutely spot on. Unbeaten runs are irrelevant if it's just one draw after another. We won't be promoted by picking up three points every three games. Better to win two, lose one. In the last four games we've taken as many points as Ipswich and they've lost two of those 5-0 and 6-0.
BL3 can't believe your still fvcking harping on

It's been 4 fvcking games

Don't you think he deserves abit more time

6 games at least
Four games is long enough to work out that N'gog isn't a winger.
Well, it took a lot longer than four games, but you never seemed to figure out that Mark Davies isn't one either!

I don't think N'Gog wide in that shape was neccessarily a bad idea. It clearly didn't work though and he looked lost. Not worried about trying things, I might be worried if we see that again though.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: The Tykes Thread

Post by BL3 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:10 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:Errr 1 game he's played on the wing not the four you keep harping on about

I can forgive DF for looking at all his options
...and he played him on the wing in the fourth of those games. There might have at least been some logic to 'looking at all his options' in the first of those games but i don't see much logic to fixing something that wasn't broken three games later... against one of the worst teams in the league.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 147 guests