Blackpool
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Blackpool
I'd prefer we alleviated Petrovs wage pressureLord Kangana wrote:Sean Davis isn't as good as Holden, nor was his impact as big on our team. There were myriad problems other than him at the time. This time around its fairly straightforward. But thats by the by.
Nor is he the kind of player that would flourish in our current midfield. I doubt, after all the time he's had out, that he'll ever get back to any sort of top level football. Would be better if we could loan him or something next season to try to alleviate his wage pressure.
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Blackpool
Agreed, get rid of Petrov.CAPSLOCK wrote:I'd prefer we alleviated Petrovs wage pressureLord Kangana wrote:Sean Davis isn't as good as Holden, nor was his impact as big on our team. There were myriad problems other than him at the time. This time around its fairly straightforward. But thats by the by.
Nor is he the kind of player that would flourish in our current midfield. I doubt, after all the time he's had out, that he'll ever get back to any sort of top level football. Would be better if we could loan him or something next season to try to alleviate his wage pressure.
Pfffft.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Blackpool
Left wing is not a priority.
Central midfield is.
The sensible option would not be to just shift problems around the team, or create new ones.
The sensible option.
Central midfield is.
The sensible option would not be to just shift problems around the team, or create new ones.
The sensible option.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Blackpool
So 'wage pressure' isn't an issue, then?
Just that as you introduced it, I thought you were concerned that we shouldn't have highly paid non contributors
Just that as you introduced it, I thought you were concerned that we shouldn't have highly paid non contributors
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Blackpool
Its an interesting coincidence that dropping Petrov has coincided with us being completely shit. But thats by the by.
Matt Taylor isn't good enough to tie down the left side. So if you want rid of one, then we'll have to buy another. Therefore, you just create space in the position you need it. I would have thought this a reasonably straightforward concept to grasp.
And with Seany being a free, I'd wager he's on a very similar package to Petrov. And it'd be even more interesting to hear if you think Seany has contributed more to the cause since he arrived. For plenty of wedge.
Matt Taylor isn't good enough to tie down the left side. So if you want rid of one, then we'll have to buy another. Therefore, you just create space in the position you need it. I would have thought this a reasonably straightforward concept to grasp.
And with Seany being a free, I'd wager he's on a very similar package to Petrov. And it'd be even more interesting to hear if you think Seany has contributed more to the cause since he arrived. For plenty of wedge.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Blackpool
Taylor isn't good enough, yet him and Rodrigo are ahead of Petrov
So, he's third in line behind 2 who aren't good enough
I'm amazed that you seem to be struggling with this straightforward concept
Sean Davis has contributed next to nothing...theres a good chance he will if he's ever fit
Seeing as he'll need to be got fit to be got rid of, I struggle to see why we'd be looking to get rid
So, he's third in line behind 2 who aren't good enough
I'm amazed that you seem to be struggling with this straightforward concept
Sean Davis has contributed next to nothing...theres a good chance he will if he's ever fit
Seeing as he'll need to be got fit to be got rid of, I struggle to see why we'd be looking to get rid
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Blackpool
Is that the same Rodrigo who has played on our right in the main, and who's on loan, or his twin brother?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Blackpool
He's the not very good Spaniard (yet) who only has one foot, his left, who has been the preferred left wing replacement for the last couple of games while Petrov has been left to fester
The fact Coyle sees him as a right winger yet plays him ahead of Petrov but behind the not good enough Taylor, speaks volumes
The fact Coyle sees him as a right winger yet plays him ahead of Petrov but behind the not good enough Taylor, speaks volumes
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Blackpool
And when he's finished his one game for us and returns to Benfica?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Blackpool
Taylor plays
Even though he's not good enough
We can sit martin 'wagepressure' Petrov on the bench
That's a great plan
Not only will our first choice not be good enough, but we'll keep our third choice, too
Splendid
Even though he's not good enough
We can sit martin 'wagepressure' Petrov on the bench
That's a great plan
Not only will our first choice not be good enough, but we'll keep our third choice, too
Splendid
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Blackpool
Back home from a good weekend by the seaside. Disappointing result but a exciting match and great atmosphere - so it was still enjoyable. Frustrating seeing these points slipping away but onwards and upwards!
Would like Blackpool to stay up.
Would like Blackpool to stay up.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Blackpool
I agree if Petrov can find a new home then getting rid of him makes sense. His wages can be better spent.
Can't be having highest earners sat on our bench. (Could argue same for Klasnic, although his impact as a sub- and the fact we'll have no strikers at the start of next season as things stand! - probably outweighs that conundrum) If Petrov isn't good enough to get past Taylor, he's not worth having.
I'd rather have Danny Ward, who's probably not on much more than 10% of Petrov's weekly packet, sat on the bench next year.
Problem is, let's say he's on around 40K, who's going to pay that for a mopey, past his best 32-year old with a history of injury problems?
Can't be having highest earners sat on our bench. (Could argue same for Klasnic, although his impact as a sub- and the fact we'll have no strikers at the start of next season as things stand! - probably outweighs that conundrum) If Petrov isn't good enough to get past Taylor, he's not worth having.
I'd rather have Danny Ward, who's probably not on much more than 10% of Petrov's weekly packet, sat on the bench next year.
Problem is, let's say he's on around 40K, who's going to pay that for a mopey, past his best 32-year old with a history of injury problems?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Blackpool
The big question mark is whether he gets fit and back to his best.Lord Kangana wrote:Sean Davis isn't as good as Holden, nor was his impact as big on our team. There were myriad problems other than him at the time. This time around its fairly straightforward. But thats by the by.
Nor is he the kind of player that would flourish in our current midfield. I doubt, after all the time he's had out, that he'll ever get back to any sort of top level football. Would be better if we could loan him or something next season to try to alleviate his wage pressure.
If he does he walks into our midfield as things stand alongside Holden.
And according to the BN guy Marc Iles, Coyle is desperate to get him fit and sharp for next season for that very reason!
Oh and as far as Petrov goes, I can't imagine we'll be trying hard to hold onto him should any mugs come in for him.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Blackpool
Sean Davis does not walk in to our midfield. I fear we've got Andranik 2.0 going on here. He was alright at best. last time I saw him last summer, he looked unfit, immobile...basically everything that we do not need in our midfield.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Blackpool
Yes when he quite clearly was not fit. If he's properly fit he's better than Muamba, Gardner and Cohen and a better foil for Holden than Mark Davies! Anyways the ? Is whether he'll get back to his best or not!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Blackpool
If Rooney signed for us then we'd be ace. The reality being that he'll come back again in that condition, possibly and probably worse because he never regained full fitness before getting injured again.
Theres no way we will see a fully match fit Sean Davis before his contract runs down.
Theres no way we will see a fully match fit Sean Davis before his contract runs down.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Blackpool
how do we do that?CAPSLOCK wrote:I'd prefer we alleviated Petrovs wage pressureLord Kangana wrote:Sean Davis isn't as good as Holden, nor was his impact as big on our team. There were myriad problems other than him at the time. This time around its fairly straightforward. But thats by the by.
Nor is he the kind of player that would flourish in our current midfield. I doubt, after all the time he's had out, that he'll ever get back to any sort of top level football. Would be better if we could loan him or something next season to try to alleviate his wage pressure.
Re: Blackpool
If we're talking Andranik 2.0.....
Incidentally, in our other 'mini-blip' this season (assumed to be from when we beat Blackburn at home, to beating Wolves), he played five of those seven games.
As for Petrov, in an ideal world we probably would get rid. However, I doubt there will be much chance of that. IMO, our only option is to blindly hope he comes good.
It hasn't made as much difference as you think it has. Holden is an above average Premier League midfielder, an inspired free-signing and an apparently lovely bloke. However, if he was capable of defining our side to the point where we're top 8 with him/relegation form without him, he'd be on for next years Ballon d'or.BWFC_Insane wrote:You are right in that Holden getting injured was the turning point. I suspected so at the time. I didn't expect it to make quite as much a difference as it has.Lord Kangana wrote:The fact a top 7 finish was still on until Evans nobbled Holden will define the season for me. If Holden had got back up, we wouldn't have conceded that goal (I'm convinced of it, he was tracking runners all day).Chalk up another point, maybe compete more confidently at Wembley. What ifs. We showed in good chunks we're good enough to compete towards the top rather than the bottom.
And its not been relentlessly, mind-numbingly boring. For that I'm eternally grateful.
Does show that the club made a mistake not getting that extra midfielder in either in the summer or more likely in January when we'd had a glimpse in December of life without Holden and it looked pretty grim!
Incidentally, in our other 'mini-blip' this season (assumed to be from when we beat Blackburn at home, to beating Wolves), he played five of those seven games.
As for Petrov, in an ideal world we probably would get rid. However, I doubt there will be much chance of that. IMO, our only option is to blindly hope he comes good.
Re: Blackpool
You're the one with all the answersthebish wrote:how do we do that?CAPSLOCK wrote:I'd prefer we alleviated Petrovs wage pressureLord Kangana wrote:Sean Davis isn't as good as Holden, nor was his impact as big on our team. There were myriad problems other than him at the time. This time around its fairly straightforward. But thats by the by.
Nor is he the kind of player that would flourish in our current midfield. I doubt, after all the time he's had out, that he'll ever get back to any sort of top level football. Would be better if we could loan him or something next season to try to alleviate his wage pressure.
I just expressed a preference
I didn't sign the useless bastard so he's not my problem
Sto ut Serviam
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Blackpool
My very rough maths suggests that with Holden in the siden this season our PPG is 1.46.Tombwfc wrote:If we're talking Andranik 2.0.....
It hasn't made as much difference as you think it has. Holden is an above average Premier League midfielder, an inspired free-signing and an apparently lovely bloke. However, if he was capable of defining our side to the point where we're top 8 with him/relegation form without him, he'd be on for next years Ballon d'or.BWFC_Insane wrote:You are right in that Holden getting injured was the turning point. I suspected so at the time. I didn't expect it to make quite as much a difference as it has.Lord Kangana wrote:The fact a top 7 finish was still on until Evans nobbled Holden will define the season for me. If Holden had got back up, we wouldn't have conceded that goal (I'm convinced of it, he was tracking runners all day).Chalk up another point, maybe compete more confidently at Wembley. What ifs. We showed in good chunks we're good enough to compete towards the top rather than the bottom.
And its not been relentlessly, mind-numbingly boring. For that I'm eternally grateful.
Does show that the club made a mistake not getting that extra midfielder in either in the summer or more likely in January when we'd had a glimpse in December of life without Holden and it looked pretty grim!
Incidentally, in our other 'mini-blip' this season (assumed to be from when we beat Blackburn at home, to beating Wolves), he played five of those seven games.
As for Petrov, in an ideal world we probably would get rid. However, I doubt there will be much chance of that. IMO, our only option is to blindly hope he comes good.
Without Holden in the side our PPG is 0.73.
I suppose you could argue thats a "coincidence". Funny how when he's got injured it was predicted.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: truewhite15 and 31 guests