If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

plymouth wanderer · Post by **plymouth wanderer** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 11:39 am

Got to admit- it started with alot of promise! but has ended up in the carsey!

Lock it!

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 11:49 am

on the contrary!! 201 pages?? BEST TRANSFER THREAD EVER!

plymouth wanderer · Post by **plymouth wanderer** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:01 pm

out of interest, what was the highest amount of pages for a transfer thread?

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:12 pm

^ careful - Enfield will see it as a personal goal!

plymouth wanderer · Post by **plymouth wanderer** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:15 pm

hoping he does!!

Gary the Enfield · Post by **Gary the Enfield** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:47 pm

It wasn't me that tipped it over. It was that LLS the attention seeking 2hat.

Lost Leopard Spot · Post by **Lost Leopard Spot** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 3:15 pm

Gary the Enfield wrote:It wasn't me that tipped it over. It was that LLS the attention seeking 2hat.

Cheeky fecker, I was trying to save you from OCD overload.

norm the jedi · Post by **norm the jedi** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 3:23 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:It wasn't me that tipped it over. It was that LLS the attention seeking 2hat.
Cheeky fecker, I was trying to save you from OCD overload.

DO we disqualify the pages where there is no actual mention of a transfer from the 201 page count ? ...

plymouth wanderer · Post by **plymouth wanderer** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 3:24 pm

norm the jedi wrote:
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:It wasn't me that tipped it over. It was that LLS the attention seeking 2hat.
Cheeky fecker, I was trying to save you from OCD overload.
DO we disqualify the pages where there is no actual mention of a transfer from the 201 page count ? ...

0

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 4:37 pm

Remember 2013 when we lost £50m even though the wagebill was 'only' £37.4m?

Was any of that huge shortfall paid to Davies as loan repayments?

Beefheart · Post by **Beefheart** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 4:52 pm

boltonboris wrote:Remember 2013 when we lost £50m even though the wagebill was 'only' £37.4m?

Was any of that huge shortfall paid to Davies as loan repayments?

No.

The wage bill was 'only' £37.4m but revenues were 'only' £35m. Making the wage bill roughly 107% of revenue that year. I really have no idea how we've found ourselves in this situation...

LeverEnd · Post by **LeverEnd** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 4:58 pm

Beefheart wrote:
boltonboris wrote:Remember 2013 when we lost £50m even though the wagebill was 'only' £37.4m?

Was any of that huge shortfall paid to Davies as loan repayments?
No.

The wage bill was 'only' £37.4m but revenues were 'only' £35m. Making the wage bill roughly 107% of revenue that year. I really have no idea how we've found ourselves in this situation...

Neither do any fans, but we're not worth explaining to.

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 5:11 pm

Beefheart wrote:
boltonboris wrote:Remember 2013 when we lost £50m even though the wagebill was 'only' £37.4m?

Was any of that huge shortfall paid to Davies as loan repayments?
No.

The wage bill was 'only' £37.4m but revenues were 'only' £35m. Making the wage bill roughly 107% of revenue that year. I really have no idea how we've found ourselves in this situation...

So £47.6m left the club and we've no idea where it went? Because I don't recall us buying any fvcker

Beefheart · Post by **Beefheart** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 5:21 pm

boltonboris wrote:
Beefheart wrote:
boltonboris wrote:Remember 2013 when we lost £50m even though the wagebill was 'only' £37.4m?

Was any of that huge shortfall paid to Davies as loan repayments?
No.

The wage bill was 'only' £37.4m but revenues were 'only' £35m. Making the wage bill roughly 107% of revenue that year. I really have no idea how we've found ourselves in this situation...
So £47.6m left the club and we've no idea where it went? Because I don't recall us buying any fvcker

What do you mean by 'left the club'?

Worthy4England · Post by **Worthy4England** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 5:45 pm

boltonboris wrote:Remember 2013 when we lost £50m even though the wagebill was 'only' £37.4m?

Was any of that huge shortfall paid to Davies as loan repayments?

In the 2013 Accounts, we earned in Revenue circa £35m. It cost us (excluding player trading for a moment) £65m to operate the Club. Out of that £7.5m was for interest payments and similar charges. Moonshift were paid £6.5m. (So that's "down £30m")

On the Player front, we lost £20m on intangible fixed assets - this is due to how the player Contracts (intangible fixed assets) are treated in the Accounts. They're treated as an asset. That's pretty much your next £20m making up the £50m total.

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:05 pm

^ I was just about to say that!

Bruce Rioja · Post by **Bruce Rioja** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 7:49 pm

Beefheart wrote:
boltonboris wrote:Remember 2013 when we lost £50m even though the wagebill was 'only' £37.4m?

Was any of that huge shortfall paid to Davies as loan repayments?
No.

The wage bill was 'only' £37.4m but revenues were 'only' £35m. Making the wage bill roughly 107% of revenue that year. I really have no idea how we've found ourselves in this situation...

Whatever happened to that business of capping the player wage bill to 60% of overall income? Did I dream that up or did it just wither on the vine? Or even fail to get off of the ground?

LeverEnd · Post by **LeverEnd** » Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:06 pm

QPR pissed all over it so I guess it's withered by now.

TonyDomingos · Post by **TonyDomingos** » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:08 pm

CONFIRMED: Luke Brattan has been recalled by parent club @MCFC. More here: bit.ly/1QFuX8X #BWFC

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:35 pm

hmmmmm..... Lennon rumoured to be playing away from home - and suddenly Luke Bratten disappears??? hmmmmmmm.......

If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Re: If carlsberg did transfer threads.....This would be it!

Who is online

Connect with your social network account

Who is online