Biggest Week of Our Lives???
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31632
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Biggest Week of Our Lives???
He hasn't only ever played for us, Willy.Wandering Willy wrote:I haven't seen enough of Mears to make such a judgement. Have you?Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Mears is (like Alonso) the type of full-back Coyle seems to have wanted: predominantly attacking, even at the risk of defensive liability. Maybe he's recognised that (particularly in 4-4-2) we need more solidity? If so, polite applause...officer_dibble wrote:if mears (and riley) is fit why does coyle shoehorn boyota in at right back? cos mears couldnt tackle a fish supper thats why.
Although I'll admit the "is" is a bit too strong: "seems to be" would be better.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 pm
Re: Biggest Week of Our Lives???
I thought Boyata did very well against (the) Villa
"A child of five would understand this- send someone to fetch a child of five"
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: Biggest Week of Our Lives???
No - I understand that DSB. I realise my question may have come across a bit facetious(Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:He hasn't only ever played for us, Willy.Wandering Willy wrote:I haven't seen enough of Mears to make such a judgement. Have you?Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Mears is (like Alonso) the type of full-back Coyle seems to have wanted: predominantly attacking, even at the risk of defensive liability. Maybe he's recognised that (particularly in 4-4-2) we need more solidity? If so, polite applause...officer_dibble wrote:if mears (and riley) is fit why does coyle shoehorn boyota in at right back? cos mears couldnt tackle a fish supper thats why.

I haven't seen much of him, maybe with Burnley on the telly but I don't remember him.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Re: Biggest Week of Our Lives???
That is backwards maths of the highest order. The income in the Prem dwarfs what it does in the Championship. If cost cutting was the be all and end all, you'd want to stay up, then make all the changes you would make for next year, thus having this imagined expenditure, but with Premiership income not Championship!mullayo wrote:Unfortunately we are in a better position to go down than stay up because we have no saleable assets that we want to sell also am I wrong in thinking the parachute payments would service our debts? I'm beginning to think it may be in the club's best interests to go down and try and do a Newcastle. Clean slate. Come back, younger, stronger, hungrier with more fans because we've had a massively successful season behind us. Of course we could stay down...
Any scenario that has us better off going down than staying up is wonky maths unless the players are on such ginormous wages that the 25%ish cut they'll have would be a bigger saving than the £40million we'd lose. Even we aren't that f*cked.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests