Boro

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Relentless09
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: Boro

Post by Relentless09 » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:06 pm

@OfficialBWFC: BWFC: Bogdan, Mears, Ricketts, Ream, Warnock, Chung-Yong, M Davies, Spearing, Petrov, Eagles, K Davies

@OfficialBWFC: BWFC Subs: Lynch, Mills, Andrews, Ngog, Afobe, Pratley, Riley
Top
thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Boro

Post by thebish » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:09 pm

a start for chungy?? :shock:
Top
thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Boro

Post by thebish » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:10 pm

btw - I like the look of that!
Top
thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Boro

Post by thebish » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:11 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Relentless09 wrote:Judging by a tweet from Sordell, he's not in the squad again
Not understanding this at all. Team, yes, but not on the bench even, is a real odd-ball. Here we have an England under 21 international who cost 3m and can't get on the bench. Must be injury or there's something drastically wrong somewhere?

no - it's simple - it's Coyle.
Top
ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: Boro

Post by ChrisC » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:11 pm

Liking the midfield and looks like Eagles will play just behind Davo. Not much protection for the back 4 with Spearing being the only real tackler but that a midfield full of quality non the less. Nice to see Ricketts back in the side aswell.
Last edited by ChrisC on Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
cecil.bob
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:13 pm

Re: Boro

Post by cecil.bob » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:12 pm

Not a bad looking team. COYWM! Three points might be doable...
Top
cecil.bob
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:13 pm

Re: Boro

Post by cecil.bob » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:13 pm

thebish wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
Relentless09 wrote:Judging by a tweet from Sordell, he's not in the squad again
Not understanding this at all. Team, yes, but not on the bench even, is a real odd-ball. Here we have an England under 21 international who cost 3m and can't get on the bench. Must be injury or there's something drastically wrong somewhere?

no - it's simple - it's Coyle.
Is Sordell another Diouf?? :shock:
Top
Ianmooreslovechild
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Re: Boro

Post by Ianmooreslovechild » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:13 pm

thebish wrote:btw - I like the look of that!
As do I. Hope they dont have giant strikers. We have pace at the back and a more balanced midfield with that line up.Cant see this ending goaless
Top
Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Boro

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:15 pm

Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
thebish wrote:btw - I like the look of that!
As do I. Hope they dont have giant strikers. We have pace at the back and a more balanced midfield with that line up.Cant see this ending goaless
Isn't that the exact team you posted? ITK?
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
Top
User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Boro

Post by Prufrock » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:16 pm

Not a bad looking team?! Have you seen that back four? They'll not win a header all game between them! Jezus. I don't think today is the day we suddenly start keeping clean sheets away from home! Does reverse jinxing work if I mention I am doing it? I've gone pretty all out

Does look like we have a lot going forward though. Decent shape. Eek.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Top
Sponge
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Re: Boro

Post by Sponge » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:17 pm

Gail Platz wrote:Just so folk know, he's said

"Good luck to the boys at Boro today, bring back the three points"

It's very strange.

Also: "Fresh start on Monday :)".

Mystery.
Top
Sponge
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Re: Boro

Post by Sponge » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:18 pm

As for today: team looks good! There's gonna be goals in this game.
Top
cecil.bob
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:13 pm

Re: Boro

Post by cecil.bob » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:20 pm

Prufrock wrote:Not a bad looking team?! Have you seen that back four? They'll not win a header all game between them! Jezus. I don't think today is the day we suddenly start keeping clean sheets away from home! Does reverse jinxing work if I mention I am doing it? I've gone pretty all out

Does look like we have a lot going forward though. Decent shape. Eek.
Not bad isn't great...

Lots to do before we start keeping clean sheets, home or away...
Top
Sponge
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Re: Boro

Post by Sponge » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:22 pm

Prufrock wrote:Not a bad looking team?! Have you seen that back four? They'll not win a header all game between them! Jezus. I don't think today is the day we suddenly start keeping clean sheets away from home! Does reverse jinxing work if I mention I am doing it? I've gone pretty all out

Does look like we have a lot going forward though. Decent shape. Eek.

Oh yeah, we're going to concede, that's certain. But we'll also score, and I reckon we have a good chance of scoring more than we concede. Which, as ever, is the point.
Top
User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Boro

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:28 pm

Knight conspicuous by his absence?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Top
Gail Platz
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 973
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm

Re: Boro

Post by Gail Platz » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:34 pm

I'm just glad Matt Mills isn't in the side. We might be able to keep a clean sheet now.
Top
User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Boro

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:36 pm

Pretty well-balanced bench. If Chungy and Petrov work hard this is a decent side. If only Wheater were back in CD I'd be well happy with this. Time for COME ON YOU WHITES! :oyea: :oyea:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Top
User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Boro

Post by Prufrock » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:36 pm

Yep. Certainly all Matt Mills' fault.

Weren't you saying on another thread Bogdan hasn't made any high profile errors?! Oh right, so Bogdan hasn't obviously cost us goals but Mills has!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Top
Gail Platz
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 973
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm

Re: Boro

Post by Gail Platz » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:38 pm

Prufrock wrote:Yep. Certainly all Matt Mills' fault.

Weren't you saying on another thread Bogdan hasn't made any high profile errors?! Oh right, so Bogdan hasn't obviously cost us goals but Mills has!
Mills pisses about when under pressure and boots it long when he's got bags of space. If he did it the other way around he'd be alright.

Bogdan hasn't been great but he hasn't done anything high profile.
Top
General Mannerheim
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm

Re: Boro

Post by General Mannerheim » Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:38 pm

I'm more pleased Afobysmal isn't playing.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “The Trotters”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 23 guests