Underperforming Players?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Underperforming Players?
Oh, you'll find no disagreement here, Chef - I'm in total agreement. It is, however, the only reason I can see for him doing what he did.Lord Kangana wrote:Its personal preference, it always is with football, but I'm of the opinion that if you have strong players in positions they are strong in, you don't merely shift them around to accomodate others. To put that in plain English, I'd have had Mears back in the team, or even a kid at fullback, if it meant keeping players who are playing well in positions they are playing well in. Like when Sam put Pedders at fullback.Bruce Rioja wrote:I assume he shifted to left back when Tierney got injured.Lord Kangana wrote:I'd agree with that.
Why change it though? That's probably the biggest frustration. Just when it looks like working....TA-DA! Tinkerman strikes!
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Underperforming Players?
when we played him regularly at the start of the season, he didn't look good, did he? or is my memory failing me? i don't remember it working that well, is all... the goals-against dried up a bit when wheater and knight got dropped...Lord Kangana wrote:Why not?
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Underperforming Players?
Two of our under performing players face the music - q&a with Knight and Spearing at tomorrow nights BWSA meeting. Brave.
Re: Underperforming Players?
Freedman should be there alongside them.officer_dibble wrote:Two of our under performing players face the music - q&a with Knight and Spearing at tomorrow nights BWSA meeting. Brave.
...
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Underperforming Players?
Ahem.... from double figures?thebish wrote: the goals-against dried up a bit when wheater and knight got dropped...
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Underperforming Players?
my memory is that we were conceding 2 per game. wheater and knight were dropped and we stopped conceding 2 per game... seems to have worsened again since Tierney was injured and McNaughton left...Lord Kangana wrote:Ahem.... from double figures?thebish wrote: the goals-against dried up a bit when wheater and knight got dropped...
maybe my memory is faulty - is that not the case?
I'm perfectly happy for you to want wheater back, btw - whatever floats your boat! it's just that I'm not sure I do...
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Underperforming Players?
Largely gone to rat-shit since McNaughton went back imo.
You see, a back 4 of ... McNaughton & Dawson and we'd only be two short of a decent defence.
You see, a back 4 of ... McNaughton & Dawson and we'd only be two short of a decent defence.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31631
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Underperforming Players?
Ream impressed in deep midfield because he can pass. Trouble is, he still had Wheater or knight behind him, until DF trooped them both.
Think the back four of McNaughton-mills-ream-Baptiste averaged fewer than a goal per game conceded.
Ream got shifted left when McNaughton went back.
Mills and Ream both only seem to play well alongside each other. It shouldn't work but it does... Better than any alternative thus far explored.
They could be reunited in the middle if Freedman would get the stick from up his arse about Mears - something I'm surprised he hasn't been more criticised for in this open season. As noted, he's done plenty wrong.
Think the back four of McNaughton-mills-ream-Baptiste averaged fewer than a goal per game conceded.
Ream got shifted left when McNaughton went back.
Mills and Ream both only seem to play well alongside each other. It shouldn't work but it does... Better than any alternative thus far explored.
They could be reunited in the middle if Freedman would get the stick from up his arse about Mears - something I'm surprised he hasn't been more criticised for in this open season. As noted, he's done plenty wrong.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Underperforming Players?
That's a fair point DSB. I think we've sort of forgotten abut Mears ... it's been a while since we've seriously thought about him.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: Underperforming Players?
I understand why he had to be shifted. and that his appearances in that position were fleeting.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Ream impressed in deep midfield because he can pass.
But he looked many times more of a footballer there than anywhere else.
He's a disastrous full back.
Which just adds another disaster to a disaster heavy defence.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Underperforming Players?
"He can pass" 4 yards, yeah. Even Spearing can do that. I wasn't counting, which is just as well!, but the number of times he tries squeezing ball between 2 midfielders and gets snuffed out is startling. He's more dangerous to us in possession than he is to any opposition.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Underperforming Players?
Ream? To be fair the lad can pick out a pass, and incisive ones at that. There is no doubt he is the best user of the ball in possession we have. He seemed to do ok at centre back though with Mills and I think he is best on the ball when stepping out from that position. He's not a great defender though, has to be said.boltonboris wrote:"He can pass" 4 yards, yeah. Even Spearing can do that. I wasn't counting, which is just as well!, but the number of times he tries squeezing ball between 2 midfielders and gets snuffed out is startling. He's more dangerous to us in possession than he is to any opposition.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Underperforming Players?
Seen that from the BWSA last night, Knight and Spearing talked about there being "rebellious players" in the squad. Said Craig Davies has been struggling with recurring hamstring injuries all season and that as a whole they might have taken the division "too lightly".
Knight apparently got some abuse from one person there....but Spearing jumped in to tell the questioner they were out of order.
Knight apparently got some abuse from one person there....but Spearing jumped in to tell the questioner they were out of order.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Underperforming Players?
It wasn't me, OK?BWFC_Insane wrote: Knight apparently got some abuse from one person there..

Was anyone from T-W present? Any chance of a run-through?
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31631
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Underperforming Players?
You don't have to count, Boz: other people do it for us. WhoScored.com have his pass-completion ratio at 75.9%, better than any other defender (and several midfielders) - not bad considering the only person who averages more passes per game is Spearing (and, to be scrupulous, Mears in his one game).boltonboris wrote:"He can pass" 4 yards, yeah. Even Spearing can do that. I wasn't counting, which is just as well!, but the number of times he tries squeezing ball between 2 midfielders and gets snuffed out is startling. He's more dangerous to us in possession than he is to any opposition.
But stats are only part of the story, and I value your opinion. For the record, I prefer Ream at centre-back rather than deep midfield - where I'd like to see Sparky alongside Medo-or-Spearing - but that's mainly due to lack of other options. And that only goes so far: we have even fewer options at left-back, but I've never been convinced by Ream there and would rather not put him out of the left.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Underperforming Players?
Rebellious players ?BWFC_Insane wrote:Seen that from the BWSA last night, Knight and Spearing talked about there being "rebellious players" in the squad. Said Craig Davies has been struggling with recurring hamstring injuries all season and that as a whole they might have taken the division "too lightly".
Knight apparently got some abuse from one person there....but Spearing jumped in to tell the questioner they were out of order.
I think names should be named. If not then I'll be forced to make some up.
You see, if THAT was Mear's game then we'd understand DF a little more.
Craig Davies .... I have to admit that I get 'Keiron Dyer' thoughts whenever a player disappears of the radar the way he has. ie would he pass a post match medical if he did play ?
Knight deserves a degree of challenge, but not abuse & good on Spearing if he stopped some, probably tanked up, scrote laying into him.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
Re: Underperforming Players?
If I may comment on this - Ream played well alongside Wheater at the dog-end of the last Premier League season. Indeed, they looked a relatively solid pairing until Wheater got injured, and we were back to Ream and Knight for the Stoke match.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: Mills and Ream both only seem to play well alongside each other. It shouldn't work but it does... Better than any alternative thus far explored.
It seems to me that Ream likes playing alongside big, solid type centre-backs. Don't know why, but maybe it gives him more confidence. Wheater, Mills fit that bill.
So yes, I'd concur - get a full-back in. Don't care who. And bring Ream back alongside Mills.
Then wait for the season to end. And for it all to start again in August.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Underperforming Players?
Its too easy to slur players that way, with a general broad brush approach.bobo the clown wrote:Rebellious players ?BWFC_Insane wrote:Seen that from the BWSA last night, Knight and Spearing talked about there being "rebellious players" in the squad. Said Craig Davies has been struggling with recurring hamstring injuries all season and that as a whole they might have taken the division "too lightly".
Knight apparently got some abuse from one person there....but Spearing jumped in to tell the questioner they were out of order.
I think names should be named. If not then I'll be forced to make some up.
You see, if THAT was Mear's game then we'd understand DF a little more.
Craig Davies .... I have to admit that I get 'Keiron Dyer' thoughts whenever a player disappears of the radar the way he has. ie would he pass a post match medical if he did play ?
Knight deserves a degree of challenge, but not abuse & good on Spearing if he stopped some, probably tanked up, scrote laying into him.
If we're speculating on who it is, perhaps its the players Dougie has brought in and then doesn't play? Or the ones he continues to pick despite several very public condemnations? After all, if it is Mears, then how in the hell would that effect our performances this season? He hasn't bloody well played.
Otherwise, its just too easy a get out from addressing real problems.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Underperforming Players?
These are two players in the squad openly admitting it though. Which is relatively unusual and telling perhaps of some of the behind the scenes problems.Lord Kangana wrote:
Its too easy to slur players that way, with a general broad brush approach.
If we're speculating on who it is, perhaps its the players Dougie has brought in and then doesn't play? Or the ones he continues to pick despite several very public condemnations? After all, if it is Mears, then how in the hell would that effect our performances this season? He hasn't bloody well played.
Otherwise, its just too easy a get out from addressing real problems.
It could very well be that is one of those "real problems" your're talking about.
Re: Underperforming Players?
It's been known for a while that the dressing room isn't happy.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: truewhite15 and 29 guests