Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
DJBlu
Site Admin
Posts: 10253
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:38 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by DJBlu » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:24 pm

Victor, that ball in was on a plate.

nicholaldo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2638
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:23 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by nicholaldo » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:25 pm

The referee seems to be letting quite a lot go.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38809
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:26 pm

Big chance that for Collins. Superb from Toal. Shame.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:26 pm

Gaaah Aaron. Toal on a shift is a sight to see.

Need to take the chances.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:30 pm

Wake up Aaron!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38809
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:31 pm

Oof no idea what Collins is trying to do there at all. Should have been one touch out and bury it.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:37 pm

fecking Cogley again. Gah.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

nicholaldo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2638
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:23 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by nicholaldo » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:37 pm

Cogley :oops:

Bijou Bob
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4051
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:35 pm
Location: Swashbucklin in Brooklyn

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Bijou Bob » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:37 pm

This is an alarmingly open game!
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:39 pm

He's already made one more in game change of shape to make us better than Evatt ever did!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

Bijou Bob
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4051
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:35 pm
Location: Swashbucklin in Brooklyn

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Bijou Bob » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:45 pm

Looks like a poor show from Reading fans in the ground 😱
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:48 pm

That was decent. Bit of a slow start, but tweak to the shape helped, after that we dominated. Collins should have a hat trick already.

They're a mad team. A threat, but ropey at the back, need to get in front.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
GhostoftheBok
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8666
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by GhostoftheBok » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:50 pm

We should be winning this, but Reading are clearly dangerous. If they had a striker I'd be more worried.

Horrible pitch is the only reason nobody has scored. Studs continually getting caught. Hope nobody twists a knee.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38809
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:50 pm

Midfield issues seemed to be sorted and we were the better side second half of that half.

Collins not quite sparkling and that does raise the question I have as to what happens when he isn’t on top form and banging them in. Randall brilliant one minute but hugely frustrating off the ball. Thomason not his best by any stretch. Sheehan is playing well and holding midfield together. Back three solid again but for me a few too many risky passes across it on a shocking pitch. I’d prefer a lower risks approach.

Oh and Murphy looks a player to me…..

User avatar
DJBlu
Site Admin
Posts: 10253
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:38 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by DJBlu » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:52 pm

Bijou Bob wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:37 pm
This is an alarmingly open game!
2 shots on to their 1.
Collins could have had a couple.

Decent half.

Victor must be crapping himself with that lad on the bench. He's not been particularly good.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38809
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:53 pm

DJBlu wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:52 pm
Bijou Bob wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:37 pm
This is an alarmingly open game!
2 shots on to their 1.
Collins could have had a couple.

Decent half.

Victor must be crapping himself with that lad on the bench. He's not been particularly good.
Vic looks not quite fit to me, he looks noticeably slowed compared to Tuesday. Still think he’s been ok. Collins hasn’t been better thus far.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38809
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:55 pm

I still maintain that Randall is just a luxury for a league one side. Clearly he could go and win the game with some brilliance but we are carrying him most of the time. If you are a Bolton player you’ve got to work a lot harder and also put your foot in.

nicholaldo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2638
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:23 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by nicholaldo » Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:56 pm

Lacking in quality but I've enjoyed the back and forth nature, even if it might be more open than we'd like.

We should probably be winning and I'm not sure about our midfield, though.

User avatar
Mar
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7012
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Mar » Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:08 pm

Good first half, not clinical, but certainly attacking with intent and had it fell better for Collins we'd likely be ahead.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:10 pm

Outstanding from Vic, that.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests