The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:50 pm
- Location: The Abyss
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
I think the other 19 teams in the premiership would of give them a better game today. We made Chelsea look better than they actually are but that's Bolton for you.Ianmooreslovechild wrote:I still think there was a point in it for us.Bit of a fortunate break for Luiz,Miyaichi not staying on the post,no tracking ofLampard.really 3 poor goals conceeded. Chelsea were generally poor and gave the ball away a lot. We just didnt have the wherewithall to do anything with our opportunities.I'll add pratley to the list of albatrocities who should never ever ever be in our starting 11. The thought of him idly leaching a living out of our club over the next 4 years is the bleakest thing about today.Turkish Trotter wrote:Today was never going to end up with us getting points.
Thought we were decent in the 1st half, but the early goal 2nd half was a sickener.
After that we played some decent stuff but were always going to leave gaps at the back.
Thought there were some plusses with Ream having a good game, Ryo looked good going forward but what he thinks about when on the post for corners I really don't know. Negatives include Pratley and Tuncay, One is not up to it, the other is being played in the wrong position, so another negative is the manager who brought both to the club.
https://twitter.com/Chaddy_81" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Well, that were shit. Ryo and Tunners did OK. Rest were awful.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
owen out


Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Prufrock wrote:Well, that were shit. Ryo and Tunners did OK. Rest were awful.
Ream?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Generous saying those two did ok like....Prufrock wrote:Well, that were shit. Ryo and Tunners did OK. Rest were awful.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Near a Shandy
- Contact:
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Got caught ball watching for their third.Sponge wrote:Prufrock wrote:Well, that were shit. Ryo and Tunners did OK. Rest were awful.
Ream?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
And fairly comfortably if the truth be told.BWFC_Insane wrote:Chelsea havent won in 6. If we had anything about us there could easily have been a point. As it is once again we let a struggling side and manager under pressure off the hook!
Struggling to recall a decent shot on target or Cech making anything like a save.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Coyle revolution gone well then....norm the jedi wrote:Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Near a Shandy
- Contact:
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Don't think Coyle is particularly culpable - The players aren't good enough...
He's tactically inept - stubborn may be but bottom line is the team
Don't think the driver of the ship can have much influence if the crew are sh1te..
I suppose it would be nice to have some ginger c*nt coming on match of the day every week to tell me how shit my support were..
and how he couldn't be responsible for how the players played, or how the chairman made him do it,...
god I miss those days..
when your dad was in charge..
He's tactically inept - stubborn may be but bottom line is the team
Don't think the driver of the ship can have much influence if the crew are sh1te..
I suppose it would be nice to have some ginger c*nt coming on match of the day every week to tell me how shit my support were..
and how he couldn't be responsible for how the players played, or how the chairman made him do it,...
god I miss those days..
when your dad was in charge..
Last edited by norm the jedi on Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
yeah - the old 4-5-1 saviour did the trick!BWFC_Insane wrote:Coyle revolution gone well then....norm the jedi wrote:Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..

- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
7 players who started today were brought to the club by Coyle. That fact alone completely debunks the bollocks you've just posted!norm the jedi wrote:Don't think Coyle is particularly culpable - The players aren't good enough...
He's tactically inept - stubborn may be but bottom line is the team
Don't think the driver of the ship can have much influence if the crew are sh1te..
I suppose it would be nice to have some ginger c*nt coming on match of the day every week to tell me how shit my support were..
and how he couldn't be responsible for how the players played, or how the chairman made him do it,...
god I miss those days..
when you're dad was in charge..
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Yeah he got the formation right, but is putting square pegs in round holes.thebish wrote:yeah - the old 4-5-1 saviour did the trick!BWFC_Insane wrote:Coyle revolution gone well then....norm the jedi wrote:Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
Tuncay is no more a right winger than you are.
Ryo is an impact twenty minutes player at most in our position.
He's playing them cos the other two wingers he's bought for those positions are shite at worst and inconsistent at best.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Hope you didn't put money on it.adamworthy2002 wrote:I can see Blackburn beating Man City tonight
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
norm the jedi wrote:Don't think Coyle is particularly culpable - The players aren't good enough...
He's tactically inept - stubborn may be but bottom line is the team
Don't think the driver of the ship can have much influence if the crew are sh1te..
I suppose it would be nice to have some ginger c*nt coming on match of the day every week to tell me how shit my support were..
and how he couldn't be responsible for how the players played, or how the chairman made him do it,...
god I miss those days..
when you're dad was in charge..
The players aren't good enough, the majority of the team is Coyles.
Bottom line is the team, Coyles team, bought and picked by Coyle.
Driver of ship cannot influence if crew is shite, Same as above.
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
You might have spotted that it was a significantly different "5" than we've previously seen.thebish wrote:yeah - the old 4-5-1 saviour did the trick!BWFC_Insane wrote:Coyle revolution gone well then....norm the jedi wrote:Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
It was like 4-4-1 with Pratley in it.

A bit like 4-4-1 with SKD in, against Wigan.
I'm sure OC will randomly hit upon a permutation that works again before the end of the season.
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
blah blah blah...BWFC_Insane wrote:Yeah he got the formation right, but is putting square pegs in round holes.thebish wrote:yeah - the old 4-5-1 saviour did the trick!BWFC_Insane wrote:Coyle revolution gone well then....norm the jedi wrote:Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
Tuncay is no more a right winger than you are.
Ryo is an impact twenty minutes player at most in our position.
He's playing them cos the other two wingers he's bought for those positions are shite at worst and inconsistent at best.
you already put this one down in your list of totally unwinnable games....
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
City so far have had 88% of the possession against Blackburn and 14 attempts to Blackburns 0.
So nice and easy next week then.....
So nice and easy next week then.....
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
BWFC_Insane wrote:
7 players who started today were brought to the club by Coyle. That fact alone completely debunks the bollocks you've just posted!
and - one of those players... PRATLEY - was one you once named as a player who would lessen the impact of losing Holden...
BWFC_Insane wrote:Holdens a good player. We won't miss him half as much this season though now that we have Pratley, NRC and a fit Mark Davies.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
Good spot!thebish wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote:
7 players who started today were brought to the club by Coyle. That fact alone completely debunks the bollocks you've just posted!
and - one of those players... PRATLEY - was one you once named as a player who would lessen the impact of losing Holden...
BWFC_Insane wrote:Holdens a good player. We won't miss him half as much this season though now that we have Pratley, NRC and a fit Mark Davies.
Insane out!

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests