The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Jokers in White
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:50 pm
Location: The Abyss

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by Jokers in White » Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:26 pm

Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
Turkish Trotter wrote:Today was never going to end up with us getting points.
Thought we were decent in the 1st half, but the early goal 2nd half was a sickener.
After that we played some decent stuff but were always going to leave gaps at the back.
Thought there were some plusses with Ream having a good game, Ryo looked good going forward but what he thinks about when on the post for corners I really don't know. Negatives include Pratley and Tuncay, One is not up to it, the other is being played in the wrong position, so another negative is the manager who brought both to the club.
I still think there was a point in it for us.Bit of a fortunate break for Luiz,Miyaichi not staying on the post,no tracking ofLampard.really 3 poor goals conceeded. Chelsea were generally poor and gave the ball away a lot. We just didnt have the wherewithall to do anything with our opportunities.I'll add pratley to the list of albatrocities who should never ever ever be in our starting 11. The thought of him idly leaching a living out of our club over the next 4 years is the bleakest thing about today.
I think the other 19 teams in the premiership would of give them a better game today. We made Chelsea look better than they actually are but that's Bolton for you.
https://twitter.com/Chaddy_81" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:46 pm

Well, that were shit. Ryo and Tunners did OK. Rest were awful.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

a1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:11 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by a1 » Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:47 pm

owen out

:|

Sponge
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by Sponge » Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:54 pm

Prufrock wrote:Well, that were shit. Ryo and Tunners did OK. Rest were awful.

Ream?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:58 pm

Prufrock wrote:Well, that were shit. Ryo and Tunners did OK. Rest were awful.
Generous saying those two did ok like....

norm the jedi
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
Location: Near a Shandy
Contact:

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by norm the jedi » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:01 pm

Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham

Whookam
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 842
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Here, there and everywhere

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by Whookam » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:03 pm

Sponge wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Well, that were shit. Ryo and Tunners did OK. Rest were awful.

Ream?
Got caught ball watching for their third.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34734
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:07 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Chelsea havent won in 6. If we had anything about us there could easily have been a point. As it is once again we let a struggling side and manager under pressure off the hook!
And fairly comfortably if the truth be told.

Struggling to recall a decent shot on target or Cech making anything like a save.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:08 pm

norm the jedi wrote:Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
Coyle revolution gone well then....

norm the jedi
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
Location: Near a Shandy
Contact:

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by norm the jedi » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:34 pm

Don't think Coyle is particularly culpable - The players aren't good enough...
He's tactically inept - stubborn may be but bottom line is the team
Don't think the driver of the ship can have much influence if the crew are sh1te..
I suppose it would be nice to have some ginger c*nt coming on match of the day every week to tell me how shit my support were..
and how he couldn't be responsible for how the players played, or how the chairman made him do it,...
god I miss those days..
when your dad was in charge..
Last edited by norm the jedi on Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by thebish » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:37 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
norm the jedi wrote:Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
Coyle revolution gone well then....
yeah - the old 4-5-1 saviour did the trick! :wink:

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:39 pm

norm the jedi wrote:Don't think Coyle is particularly culpable - The players aren't good enough...
He's tactically inept - stubborn may be but bottom line is the team
Don't think the driver of the ship can have much influence if the crew are sh1te..
I suppose it would be nice to have some ginger c*nt coming on match of the day every week to tell me how shit my support were..
and how he couldn't be responsible for how the players played, or how the chairman made him do it,...
god I miss those days..
when you're dad was in charge..
7 players who started today were brought to the club by Coyle. That fact alone completely debunks the bollocks you've just posted!

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:41 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
norm the jedi wrote:Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
Coyle revolution gone well then....
yeah - the old 4-5-1 saviour did the trick! :wink:
Yeah he got the formation right, but is putting square pegs in round holes.

Tuncay is no more a right winger than you are.

Ryo is an impact twenty minutes player at most in our position.

He's playing them cos the other two wingers he's bought for those positions are shite at worst and inconsistent at best.

Annoyed Grunt
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8046
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
Location: Bolton

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by Annoyed Grunt » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:42 pm

adamworthy2002 wrote:I can see Blackburn beating Man City tonight
Hope you didn't put money on it.

Turkish Trotter
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1861
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by Turkish Trotter » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:42 pm

norm the jedi wrote:Don't think Coyle is particularly culpable - The players aren't good enough...
He's tactically inept - stubborn may be but bottom line is the team
Don't think the driver of the ship can have much influence if the crew are sh1te..
I suppose it would be nice to have some ginger c*nt coming on match of the day every week to tell me how shit my support were..
and how he couldn't be responsible for how the players played, or how the chairman made him do it,...
god I miss those days..
when you're dad was in charge..

The players aren't good enough, the majority of the team is Coyles.
Bottom line is the team, Coyles team, bought and picked by Coyle.
Driver of ship cannot influence if crew is shite, Same as above.
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34734
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:43 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
norm the jedi wrote:Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
Coyle revolution gone well then....
yeah - the old 4-5-1 saviour did the trick! :wink:
You might have spotted that it was a significantly different "5" than we've previously seen.

It was like 4-4-1 with Pratley in it. :D

A bit like 4-4-1 with SKD in, against Wigan.

I'm sure OC will randomly hit upon a permutation that works again before the end of the season.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by thebish » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:44 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
norm the jedi wrote:Dead and buried.....
Roll on the summer.. No quality - precious little intelligence and the creative finesse of a cluster bomb...
We don't create anything - We can't score goals - there are not three teams in this league worse than us..
We're bemoaning the lack of Mavies... who essentially runs around, tries hard and very occasionally makes or scores a goal..
but mostly he's a willing runner.. without him we are bereft of attacking options it seems ?..
We deserve all we get..
Lets just concentrate on the cup run..
Coyle revolution gone well then....
yeah - the old 4-5-1 saviour did the trick! :wink:
Yeah he got the formation right, but is putting square pegs in round holes.

Tuncay is no more a right winger than you are.

Ryo is an impact twenty minutes player at most in our position.

He's playing them cos the other two wingers he's bought for those positions are shite at worst and inconsistent at best.
blah blah blah...

you already put this one down in your list of totally unwinnable games....

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:54 pm

City so far have had 88% of the possession against Blackburn and 14 attempts to Blackburns 0.

So nice and easy next week then.....

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by thebish » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:54 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
7 players who started today were brought to the club by Coyle. That fact alone completely debunks the bollocks you've just posted!

and - one of those players... PRATLEY - was one you once named as a player who would lessen the impact of losing Holden...
BWFC_Insane wrote:Holdens a good player. We won't miss him half as much this season though now that we have Pratley, NRC and a fit Mark Davies.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34734
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:56 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
7 players who started today were brought to the club by Coyle. That fact alone completely debunks the bollocks you've just posted!

and - one of those players... PRATLEY - was one you once named as a player who would lessen the impact of losing Holden...
BWFC_Insane wrote:Holdens a good player. We won't miss him half as much this season though now that we have Pratley, NRC and a fit Mark Davies.
Good spot!

Insane out! :mrgreen:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests