Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Abs
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:19 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Abs » Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:34 pm

TKIZ! wrote:
Abs wrote:No Cesc was injury prone last season and started less than 30 games for us. He still got 9 goals and 14 assists, and was the player who created most chances per miniute in the PL last season
No he didn't, that was Nani and Drogba. Fabregas got third
I said he has been the player who created most chances per minute....not assists.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:39 pm

Abs wrote:No Cesc was injury prone last season
Thats OK, then

Image
Sto ut Serviam

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jaffka » Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:51 pm

Abs wrote:No Cesc was injury prone last season and started less than 30 games for us. He still got 9 goals and 14 assists, and was the player who created most chances per miniute in the PL last season
What is the purpose of you coming on here? Do you think that Eddie and Phil are going to suddenly decide that Cahill can leave for nowt?

Jog on, your boring.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:02 pm

Abs wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
Abs wrote:No Cesc was injury prone last season and started less than 30 games for us. He still got 9 goals and 14 assists, and was the player who created most chances per miniute in the PL last season
No he didn't, that was Nani and Drogba. Fabregas got third
I said he has been the player who created most chances per minute....not assists.
nobody records stats for a category called "creating chances" - what does it even mean?? :conf:

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:21 pm

It means Kevin Davies keeps getting picked
Sto ut Serviam

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:22 pm

I wonder what you'll do when he leaves

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:26 pm

Me?

I'll say thanks, Kev

Thanks for everything

Now, go and sit over there with the VHS, CD player and Megadrive
Sto ut Serviam

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by TKIZ! » Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:37 am

Lofthouse Lower wrote:I wonder what you'll do when he leaves
CAPSLOCK will cry
Pfffft.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:38 am

Probably just move onto someone else

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by TKIZ! » Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:39 am

Lofthouse Lower wrote:Probably just move onto someone else
Nope, he definitely cry. :cry:
Pfffft.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:01 pm

TKIZ! wrote:
Lofthouse Lower wrote:I wonder what you'll do when he leaves
CAPSLOCK will cry tears of joy
Sorted
Sto ut Serviam

Randy Watson
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:46 am
Location: Queens, NYC

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Randy Watson » Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:17 pm

so whats the latest on the official gary cahill transfer thread?

just pulling this back on topic? is he down the road or what?
Give a hand to my band… Sexual Chocolate

They play so fine don't you agree!

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:29 pm

Randy Watson wrote:so whats the latest on the official gary cahill transfer thread?

just pulling this back on topic? is he down the road or what?
According to Abs we just have to offer somebody a few bob and they'll take him off our hands. Apart from that, nothing new.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

martin1877coywm
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:14 am
Location: Las Vegas, USA

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by martin1877coywm » Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:26 pm

I am very surprised how Sunderland are able to get so much money for their players: First 24m for Bent and then 20m for Henderson. Now that freed them up to get two quality players in Larsson and Gardner. Then Aston Villa sold Young for around 15m. That makes me think Cahill will be worth less than that because Young is rated so much higher.

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:16 pm

Seb Larsson is nowhere near good enough for Sunderland...or Bolton. Or most Premier League teams come to think of it.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

mrpiccollo
Promising
Promising
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:00 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by mrpiccollo » Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:28 pm

martin1877coywm wrote:I am very surprised how Sunderland are able to get so much money for their players: First 24m for Bent and then 20m for Henderson. Now that freed them up to get two quality players in Larsson and Gardner. Then Aston Villa sold Young for around 15m. That makes me think Cahill will be worth less than that because Young is rated so much higher.
they allways overpay for mediocre players too so i suppose its par for the course sadly we over pay for absulute shithouses alla elmander and lets be honest rarely make tranfer profit the big clubs know this and are constantly lowballing us or holding back hoping we will sell in a panic, still cahill is worth every bit of his buyout clause so they should pay if they want him.
Image
Image

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:19 am

old twitchy chops has set up stall on the Reebok car park with a car-boot full of dodgy goods to swap for Cahill....
Tottenham boss Harry Redknapp is hoping to hijack North London rival Arsene Wenger’s bid for Bolton defender Gary Cahill. Wenger has dilly-dallied for some time over purchasing the centre-back and it seems now Redknapp will steal a march with a £17m offer.

Bolton boss Owen Coyle is resigned to losing Cahill. The former Villa defender rates himself as good enough to play for the big boys in the Premiership and has made his desire to try his hand at one of them public on several occasions.

A move to White Hart Lane would pose a real challenge for Cahill as Tottenham’s squad currently boasts arguably the strongest set of centre-backs in the league, with promising defenders Younes Kaboul and Sebastian Bassong fourth and fifth choice behind William Gallas, Michael Dawson and club captain Ledley King.

One idea being mooted is that Bassong could be offered to Bolton to fill the gap Cahill’s departure would leave. If so, this could knock around £5m off the transfer fee, and would leave Bolton less in the lurch were they not able to secure another replacement.

Other Tottenham players touted as possible makeweights in the deal are Robbie Keane, David Bentley and Danny Rose. Keane’s Tottenham career is clearly at an end and Redknapp would be more than willing to offload him, however, Bentley and Rose would most likely move on season long loan deals.

Redknapp has always had faith in English talent and the purchase of Cahill would add to the English spine of Dawson, King, Huddlestone, Lennon, Crouch and Defoe.

Along with Phil Jones, Jordan Henderson and Ashley Young, Cahill is one of the most sought after English youngsters in this transfer window, and with Manchester United and Liverpool having moved early to secure those deals, it seems Redknapp will not play the risky waiting game à-la-Wenger.

Gooner Girl
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8578
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
Location: Mid Sussex

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Gooner Girl » Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:27 am

thebish wrote:old twitchy chops has set up stall on the Reebok car park with a car-boot full of dodgy goods to swap for Cahill....
Tottenham boss Harry Redknapp is hoping to hijack North London rival Arsene Wenger’s bid for Bolton defender Gary Cahill. Wenger has dilly-dallied for some time over purchasing the centre-back and it seems now Redknapp will steal a march with a £17m offer.

Bolton boss Owen Coyle is resigned to losing Cahill. The former Villa defender rates himself as good enough to play for the big boys in the Premiership and has made his desire to try his hand at one of them public on several occasions.

A move to White Hart Lane would pose a real challenge for Cahill as Tottenham’s squad currently boasts arguably the strongest set of centre-backs in the league, with promising defenders Younes Kaboul and Sebastian Bassong fourth and fifth choice behind William Gallas, Michael Dawson and club captain Ledley King.

One idea being mooted is that Bassong could be offered to Bolton to fill the gap Cahill’s departure would leave. If so, this could knock around £5m off the transfer fee, and would leave Bolton less in the lurch were they not able to secure another replacement.

Other Tottenham players touted as possible makeweights in the deal are Robbie Keane, David Bentley and Danny Rose. Keane’s Tottenham career is clearly at an end and Redknapp would be more than willing to offload him, however, Bentley and Rose would most likely move on season long loan deals.

Redknapp has always had faith in English talent and the purchase of Cahill would add to the English spine of Dawson, King, Huddlestone, Lennon, Crouch and Defoe.

Along with Phil Jones, Jordan Henderson and Ashley Young, Cahill is one of the most sought after English youngsters in this transfer window, and with Manchester United and Liverpool having moved early to secure those deals, it seems Redknapp will not play the risky waiting game à-la-Wenger.
C'mon Cahill, you can do better then Spurs!

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:34 am

If they'll pay the money, I don't care if he goes to Accrington Stanley.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:49 pm

martin1877coywm wrote:That makes me think Cahill will be worth less than that because Young is rated so much higher.
Young is, er, older. Like I explained before, when you buy someone younger who has proven Premier ability (Cahill, Henderson, Phil Jones) it's because you're hoping he will become world-class, a regular international; effectively you're paying a top-up tax for potential. Young is already a semi-regular international but he'll never be world class; he could improve on his game and be an annoyingly good signing for the rags, but he's not the next Ronaldo.

As for Spurs: Bentley's an interesting one considering our lack of right-wing depth and his previous Lancastrian spell, but I'll bet you a pound to a pint of piss that if we get (further) linked with him there'll be moans on here. "Broadway" Danny Rose is more Coyle's kinda player - young, potential, midfielder. Keane, no.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mar and 28 guests