shakers

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:12 am

She said that too

urscum

Re: shakers

Post by urscum » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:13 am

Lofthouse Lower wrote:She said that too

your sister was so tight






























wouldnt lend me 10p
Last edited by urscum on Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:13 am

See, now you're learning

Anton Fingers
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:47 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Anton Fingers » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:14 am

urscum wrote:
Lofthouse Lower wrote:Funny, that's what your Mum said.


































8)
I would respond with a childish comment but you probably wouldnt understand it coming from a well spoken person now get back to your window licking you typical noblot wankers scumbag
I'm guessing you don't see the irony in your post :laugh:

urscum

Re: shakers

Post by urscum » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:19 am

Anton Fingers wrote:
urscum wrote:
Lofthouse Lower wrote:Funny, that's what your Mum said.


































8)
I would respond with a childish comment but you probably wouldnt understand it coming from a well spoken person now get back to your window licking you typical noblot wankers scumbag
I'm guessing you don't see the irony in your post :laugh:
to be fair i do!

because to my understanding of the "funny thats what your mum said" comment was to impy that he had taught my mum new sexual positions/acts thus she called him an inventive person, I replied with my comment basically saying "your mum" jokes are quite childish but i later replied wth a "your sister joke" to bring myself down to his level. Do you think i understand now Mr Noblotter?

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Re: shakers

Post by CrazyHorse » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:21 am

urscum wrote:to be fair i do!

because to my understanding of the "funny thats what your mum said" comment was to impy that he had taught my mum new sexual positions/acts thus she called him an inventive person, I replied with my comment basically saying "your mum" jokes are quite childish but i later replied wth a "your sister joke" to bring myself down to his level. Do you think i understand now Mr Noblotter?
Anyway.
Now you've got the insults off your chest-though I'm a bit disappointed you've not managed to cram a wanky wanky wanderers in there yet, any chance of offering an opinion of the result of this game?

I think you'll tonk us 4-0.
Businesswoman of the year.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:22 am

Is Sergeant Stant going to play? Ronnie Jepson?

urscum

Re: shakers

Post by urscum » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:25 am

CrazyHorse wrote:
urscum wrote:to be fair i do!

because to my understanding of the "funny thats what your mum said" comment was to impy that he had taught my mum new sexual positions/acts thus she called him an inventive person, I replied with my comment basically saying "your mum" jokes are quite childish but i later replied wth a "your sister joke" to bring myself down to his level. Do you think i understand now Mr Noblotter?
Anyway.
Now you've got the insults off your chest-though I'm a bit disappointed you've not managed to cram a wanky wanky wanderers in there yet, any chance of offering an opinion of the result of this game?

I think you'll tonk us 4-0.

In all honesty i can be a nice guy just not to bolton most of the time!

Youll probably spank us four or five - 1! no denying it everton beat us 4-1 last week but we didnt look intrested!

the wanky wanky wanderes thing didnt come to mind at the time but i can assure you it will be brought in in future times.

anyone know why the game has been mooved to wednesday as it was billed as a tuesday game at first wasnt it?

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:27 am

Something to do with the tea lady not being available on Tuesday, think it's bridge night down at Silver Street

Anton Fingers
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:47 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Anton Fingers » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:27 am

urscum wrote:
Anton Fingers wrote:
urscum wrote:
Lofthouse Lower wrote:Funny, that's what your Mum said.


































8)
I would respond with a childish comment but you probably wouldnt understand it coming from a well spoken person now get back to your window licking you typical noblot wankers scumbag
I'm guessing you don't see the irony in your post :laugh:
to be fair i do!

because to my understanding of the "funny thats what your mum said" comment was to impy that he had taught my mum new sexual positions/acts thus she called him an inventive person, I replied with my comment basically saying "your mum" jokes are quite childish but i later replied wth a "your sister joke" to bring myself down to his level. Do you think i understand now Mr Noblotter?
Nope, not really; I don't

Anyway, what're your thoughts on this season? And how highly do you rate Barker?

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:28 am

Has Bishops' gammy leg sorted itself out?

urscum

Re: shakers

Post by urscum » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:33 am

Lofthouse Lower wrote:Has Bishops' gammy leg sorted itself out?
He had another op at the end of last season

first time a specalist has put a camera in to have a look

he says he feels better

seems to be putting the blame on our own ginger prick who left for s****horpe towards the end of last season for rushing him back to quick (most fans could see that was the problem)

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:35 am

So you're not just relying on a 33 year old striker then, you're also relying on an injury prone, not-played-for-18-months crock too?

Ha

urscum

Re: shakers

Post by urscum » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:44 am

Lofthouse Lower wrote:So you're not just relying on a 33 year old striker then, you're also relying on an injury prone, not-played-for-18-months crock too?

Ha
a 33 year old who score 28 goals last season
and a 28 year old who has a record of 1 in 3 not to bad to be fair is it!

your relying on davies who scores about ten a season?

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: shakers

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:45 am

I'd love to join in, but I haven't a clue who plays for Bury.

Sorry an all that.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:46 am

Yes. As we have for eight seasons - in which we've not done too badly.

You're certs for relegation.

urscum

Re: shakers

Post by urscum » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:48 am

Lofthouse Lower wrote:Yes. As we have for eight seasons - in which we've not done too badly.

You're certs for relegation.

would have a wager with you that we will be one league closer to each other next season but i dont trust your money!!

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:51 am

I would have a bet with you too, but I am unsure that you would have any money.

Went to school in Bury so am fully aware of the failings of you and your kind.

urscum

Re: shakers

Post by urscum » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:54 am

Lofthouse Lower wrote:I would have a bet with you too, but I am unsure that you would have any money.

Went to school in Bury so am fully aware of the failings of you and your kind.
Well

A) I wasn't born in Bury (born a few miles away first game was a Bury match supported us ever since)

B) I have one of theese things called a Job so im probably supplying you with money!!

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:56 am

So you CHOSE to support that set of idle losers? Blimey, are you some sort of masochist (http://www.dictionary.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)?

Secondly - oh, now I recognise you - you forgot my milkshake.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dave the minion, Google [Bot], sonicthewhite and 32 guests