shakers
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: shakers
She said that too
Re: shakers
Lofthouse Lower wrote:She said that too
your sister was so tight
wouldnt lend me 10p
Last edited by urscum on Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: shakers
See, now you're learning
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:47 pm
Re: shakers
I'm guessing you don't see the irony in your posturscum wrote:I would respond with a childish comment but you probably wouldnt understand it coming from a well spoken person now get back to your window licking you typical noblot wankers scumbagLofthouse Lower wrote:Funny, that's what your Mum said.

Re: shakers
to be fair i do!Anton Fingers wrote:I'm guessing you don't see the irony in your posturscum wrote:I would respond with a childish comment but you probably wouldnt understand it coming from a well spoken person now get back to your window licking you typical noblot wankers scumbagLofthouse Lower wrote:Funny, that's what your Mum said.
because to my understanding of the "funny thats what your mum said" comment was to impy that he had taught my mum new sexual positions/acts thus she called him an inventive person, I replied with my comment basically saying "your mum" jokes are quite childish but i later replied wth a "your sister joke" to bring myself down to his level. Do you think i understand now Mr Noblotter?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: shakers
Anyway.urscum wrote:to be fair i do!
because to my understanding of the "funny thats what your mum said" comment was to impy that he had taught my mum new sexual positions/acts thus she called him an inventive person, I replied with my comment basically saying "your mum" jokes are quite childish but i later replied wth a "your sister joke" to bring myself down to his level. Do you think i understand now Mr Noblotter?
Now you've got the insults off your chest-though I'm a bit disappointed you've not managed to cram a wanky wanky wanderers in there yet, any chance of offering an opinion of the result of this game?
I think you'll tonk us 4-0.
Businesswoman of the year.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: shakers
Is Sergeant Stant going to play? Ronnie Jepson?
Re: shakers
CrazyHorse wrote:Anyway.urscum wrote:to be fair i do!
because to my understanding of the "funny thats what your mum said" comment was to impy that he had taught my mum new sexual positions/acts thus she called him an inventive person, I replied with my comment basically saying "your mum" jokes are quite childish but i later replied wth a "your sister joke" to bring myself down to his level. Do you think i understand now Mr Noblotter?
Now you've got the insults off your chest-though I'm a bit disappointed you've not managed to cram a wanky wanky wanderers in there yet, any chance of offering an opinion of the result of this game?
I think you'll tonk us 4-0.
In all honesty i can be a nice guy just not to bolton most of the time!
Youll probably spank us four or five - 1! no denying it everton beat us 4-1 last week but we didnt look intrested!
the wanky wanky wanderes thing didnt come to mind at the time but i can assure you it will be brought in in future times.
anyone know why the game has been mooved to wednesday as it was billed as a tuesday game at first wasnt it?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: shakers
Something to do with the tea lady not being available on Tuesday, think it's bridge night down at Silver Street
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:47 pm
Re: shakers
Nope, not really; I don'turscum wrote:to be fair i do!Anton Fingers wrote:I'm guessing you don't see the irony in your posturscum wrote:I would respond with a childish comment but you probably wouldnt understand it coming from a well spoken person now get back to your window licking you typical noblot wankers scumbagLofthouse Lower wrote:Funny, that's what your Mum said.
because to my understanding of the "funny thats what your mum said" comment was to impy that he had taught my mum new sexual positions/acts thus she called him an inventive person, I replied with my comment basically saying "your mum" jokes are quite childish but i later replied wth a "your sister joke" to bring myself down to his level. Do you think i understand now Mr Noblotter?
Anyway, what're your thoughts on this season? And how highly do you rate Barker?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: shakers
Has Bishops' gammy leg sorted itself out?
Re: shakers
He had another op at the end of last seasonLofthouse Lower wrote:Has Bishops' gammy leg sorted itself out?
first time a specalist has put a camera in to have a look
he says he feels better
seems to be putting the blame on our own ginger prick who left for s****horpe towards the end of last season for rushing him back to quick (most fans could see that was the problem)
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: shakers
So you're not just relying on a 33 year old striker then, you're also relying on an injury prone, not-played-for-18-months crock too?
Ha
Ha
Re: shakers
a 33 year old who score 28 goals last seasonLofthouse Lower wrote:So you're not just relying on a 33 year old striker then, you're also relying on an injury prone, not-played-for-18-months crock too?
Ha
and a 28 year old who has a record of 1 in 3 not to bad to be fair is it!
your relying on davies who scores about ten a season?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: shakers
I'd love to join in, but I haven't a clue who plays for Bury.
Sorry an all that.
Sorry an all that.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: shakers
Yes. As we have for eight seasons - in which we've not done too badly.
You're certs for relegation.
You're certs for relegation.
Re: shakers
Lofthouse Lower wrote:Yes. As we have for eight seasons - in which we've not done too badly.
You're certs for relegation.
would have a wager with you that we will be one league closer to each other next season but i dont trust your money!!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: shakers
I would have a bet with you too, but I am unsure that you would have any money.
Went to school in Bury so am fully aware of the failings of you and your kind.
Went to school in Bury so am fully aware of the failings of you and your kind.
Re: shakers
WellLofthouse Lower wrote:I would have a bet with you too, but I am unsure that you would have any money.
Went to school in Bury so am fully aware of the failings of you and your kind.
A) I wasn't born in Bury (born a few miles away first game was a Bury match supported us ever since)
B) I have one of theese things called a Job so im probably supplying you with money!!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: shakers
So you CHOSE to support that set of idle losers? Blimey, are you some sort of masochist (http://www.dictionary.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)?
Secondly - oh, now I recognise you - you forgot my milkshake.
Secondly - oh, now I recognise you - you forgot my milkshake.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: dave the minion, Google [Bot], sonicthewhite and 32 guests