Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
I asked one. This is what he said:Eloy wrote:Hence, until an English professor tells me that saying "This office are financially responsible" is correct, I will stubbornly and strongly disagree with you!
Top English Professor wrote:I am an English professor. Pru and thebish are right - Canadians and Americans are wrong.
you're welcome!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
West Brom is not striking fear into my soul. They seem kinda lightweight from MOTD, so fairly dangerous but with a soft underbelly.
Could go either way, would be happy with anything better than a loss.
Could go either way, would be happy with anything better than a loss.
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
Eloy wrote:You just blew my mind. If you're correct, I have about 100 apologies to make to the people whom I've ridiculed over the years.Prufrock wrote:Hi, me again. Capt. Fun. It isn't grammatically incorrect. Singular collective nouns can take plural verbs, normally where it is a group of people. It is called 'metonymic merging' of grammatical number. I shit you not. It is 'Stoke are a good team' because what is 'good' is the collective ability of a set of individuals. 'The players, together, as a team, are good', becomes 'Stoke are good'.Eloy wrote:That is SO grammatically incorrect.thebish wrote:Stoke ARE a better team is how Brits would say it (unless they are wrong!)
Spain are the World Cup holders.... (not "is")
Are you saying that BOTH versions are correct? You can say STOKE IS and STOKE ARE? And both would be correct?
Stoke IS a sh*t hole
Stoke ARE sh*tholes
Stoke IS the pits
Stoke ARE a mid table team
English IS English
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43337
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
Are.Armchair Wanderer wrote:West Brom is not striking fear into my soul. They seem kinda lightweight from MOTD, so fairly dangerous but with a soft underbelly.
Could go either way, would be happy with anything better than a loss.
The West Brom fixture is not striking fear into my soul.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
In fact, I think you'll find that he said "... Canadians and Americans IS wrong ..." .thebish wrote:I asked one. This is what he said:Eloy wrote:Hence, until an English professor tells me that saying "This office are financially responsible" is correct, I will stubbornly and strongly disagree with you!
Top English Professor wrote:I am an English professor. Pru and thebish are right - Canadians and Americans are wrong.you're welcome!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
too far, bobo.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
- Location: Bolton
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
3 - 1 to West Brom..
1 - 1 until 80 mins then we'll lose two quick goals.
Cahill to score and an Oghfedegwqindow hatrick
1 - 1 until 80 mins then we'll lose two quick goals.
Cahill to score and an Oghfedegwqindow hatrick
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
Nicely done, yeah, thanks Tango.TANGODANCER wrote:Are.Armchair Wanderer wrote:West Brom is not striking fear into my soul. They seem kinda lightweight from MOTD, so fairly dangerous but with a soft underbelly.
Could go either way, would be happy with anything better than a loss.
The West Brom fixture is not striking fear into my soul.
With hindsight that should have been "the thought of playing West Brom", but this is an interesting discussion.
I'm from the school of thought that you should probably put a comma somewhere if it feels right. But I'm not with that thing of putting a comma with the last "and", i.e. "Our first three games were against QPR, Citeh, and Liverpool". It really doesn't need that last comma for me.
I'd like to know about how to use grammar in a better way, but only if it takes a short amount of time. Is there a helpful leaflet or something?
Did OC go with that lineup against Stoke purely because of the type of team they are? If so will he change the makeup of the team against a lighter, fluffier West Brom? I'm thinking that maybe he didn't play Petrov because he didn't think crosses into the box would work against Stoke, so may revert back to him for the next game.
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
That's called an Oxford comma - I, personally, use it all the time.Armchair Wanderer wrote:Nicely done, yeah, thanks Tango.TANGODANCER wrote:Are.Armchair Wanderer wrote:West Brom is not striking fear into my soul. They seem kinda lightweight from MOTD, so fairly dangerous but with a soft underbelly.
Could go either way, would be happy with anything better than a loss.
The West Brom fixture is not striking fear into my soul.
With hindsight that should have been "the thought of playing West Brom", but this is an interesting discussion.
I'm from the school of thought that you should probably put a comma somewhere if it feels right. But I'm not with that thing of putting a comma with the last "and", i.e. "Our first three games were against QPR, Citeh, and Liverpool". It really doesn't need that last comma for me.
I'd like to know about how to use grammar in a better way, but only if it takes a short amount of time. Is there a helpful leaflet or something?
Did OC go with that lineup against Stoke purely because of the type of team they are? If so will he change the makeup of the team against a lighter, fluffier West Brom? I'm thinking that maybe he didn't play Petrov because he didn't think crosses into the box would work against Stoke, so may revert back to him for the next game.
Maybe with lots of usage we could get part of the English language named after Bolton (t'Bolton T for instance).
Anyway won't be at the match Saturday, but I've put a fiver on for Bolton to win 2-1.
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
2-1 WBA for me, we'll do okay but not quite enough
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
Is Odemwingie still injured? I can't find any info about when he's due back.
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
according to the Physio Room - knee injury - no return date...The Axman wrote:Is Odemwingie still injured? I can't find any info about when he's due back.
http://www.physioroom.com/news/english_ ... _table.php
and - we top the injuries table! yay!!
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
What, even more than Arsenal - that's some feat!thebish wrote:according to the Physio Room - knee injury - no return date...The Axman wrote:Is Odemwingie still injured? I can't find any info about when he's due back.
http://www.physioroom.com/news/english_ ... _table.php
and - we top the injuries table! yay!!
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
they're second... and we only have half the squad that they do....The Axman wrote:What, even more than Arsenal - that's some feat!thebish wrote:according to the Physio Room - knee injury - no return date...The Axman wrote:Is Odemwingie still injured? I can't find any info about when he's due back.
http://www.physioroom.com/news/english_ ... _table.php
and - we top the injuries table! yay!!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
- Location: Bolton
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
Not sure, but on some of the WBA forums the fans seem to be including him in their starting 11.The Axman wrote:Is Odemwingie still injured? I can't find any info about when he's due back.
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
This happens to be my first visit to The Hawthorns despite how many times weve played there. Anywhere nearby considered an away friendly pub?
On another note, I wish Hawthorns was still open
On another note, I wish Hawthorns was still open
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28818
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1469
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:05 pm
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
I went there after the last match at Burnden, got arseholed, copped off with a reasonably good looking female and had a lovely kebab on the walk home. Awesome.P.O.S. wrote:This happens to be my first visit to The Hawthorns despite how many times weve played there. Anywhere nearby considered an away friendly pub?
On another note, I wish Hawthorns was still open
What a hero, What a man...... Ooooh, what a bad foul...
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
Andy Waller wrote:I'm having a huge fry up, a few drinks on the train, watching the Superwhites win 7-0, a few more drinks on the train home, out for a curry, slip the missus a crippler and then pass out. I'm not entertaining any other outcome than that.
Good to see you're shunning the stereotype of the football-watching male!Andy Waller wrote:I went there after the last match at Burnden, got arseholed, copped off with a reasonably good looking female and had a lovely kebab on the walk home. Awesome.
Re: Bolton v Baggies - Match thread
Yep, really does beg the question: is the reasonably good looking female the same person as the missus?Sponge wrote:Andy Waller wrote:I'm having a huge fry up, a few drinks on the train, watching the Superwhites win 7-0, a few more drinks on the train home, out for a curry, slip the missus a crippler and then pass out. I'm not entertaining any other outcome than that.Good to see you're shunning the stereotype of the football-watching male!Andy Waller wrote:I went there after the last match at Burnden, got arseholed, copped off with a reasonably good looking female and had a lovely kebab on the walk home. Awesome.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 114 guests