Time to go (2)
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Time to go (2)
Bit like AVB at Chelsea.Bruce Rioja wrote:Coyle's 'great scheme of things' future-of-the-club-generating its-own is ideal. His problem is that he's trying to sell it to players that form no part of it. If you're out the door at the end of this season what's your motivation?(And if anyone says £XXX per week then they're every bit as bad as Coyle)
'Oi Frank you're a bit old and not in my long term plans,but can you just play well when I pick you in the meantime, cheers lad'
Re: Time to go (2)
hmmm... true in the grand scheme of things - but would that mean that in the run-in to the season's close, you'd have to change your mind as to who was a better manager week by week as wolves/bolton/wiggin/b'burn/QPR play musical chairs - swapping places up and down?Worthy4England wrote:
That's fine, take a few minutes, but I'll give you a clue.
It's not about how we do against each other, it's about how we do overall.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Time to go (2)
I don't think there's a whole lot in it TBH.thebish wrote:hmmm... true in the grand scheme of things - but would that mean that in the run-in to the season's close, you'd have to change your mind as to who was a better manager week by week as wolves/bolton/wiggin/b'burn/QPR play musical chairs - swapping places up and down?Worthy4England wrote:
That's fine, take a few minutes, but I'll give you a clue.
It's not about how we do against each other, it's about how we do overall.
The point I was making was that plenty would say Kean is shite, but wouldn't say Coyle was shite when measured by the same yardstick. They start waffling aimlessly about how the price of eggs has affected Coyle's season, the impact the US crop reports might have had. In fact anything other than the things that actually count. How he's getting our squad to play like they actually meet each other between matches.
You would of course only need to change your mind as to who was the better Manager, should the forecast of musical chairs actually occur.
Re: Time to go (2)
oh - I predict there will be plenty of musical chairs over the next 11 or so games!!Worthy4England wrote:I don't think there's a whole lot in it TBH.thebish wrote:hmmm... true in the grand scheme of things - but would that mean that in the run-in to the season's close, you'd have to change your mind as to who was a better manager week by week as wolves/bolton/wiggin/b'burn/QPR play musical chairs - swapping places up and down?Worthy4England wrote:
That's fine, take a few minutes, but I'll give you a clue.
It's not about how we do against each other, it's about how we do overall.
The point I was making was that plenty would say Kean is shite, but wouldn't say Coyle was shite when measured by the same yardstick. They start waffling aimlessly about how the price of eggs has affected Coyle's season, the impact the US crop reports might have had. In fact anything other than the things that actually count. How he's getting our squad to play like they actually meet each other between matches.
You would of course only need to change your mind as to who was the better Manager, should the forecast of musical chairs actually occur.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Time to go (2)
oh - I agree. I'm just not convinced yet, that our chair hasn't already been removed!!thebish wrote:oh - I predict there will be plenty of musical chairs over the next 11 or so games!!Worthy4England wrote:I don't think there's a whole lot in it TBH.thebish wrote:hmmm... true in the grand scheme of things - but would that mean that in the run-in to the season's close, you'd have to change your mind as to who was a better manager week by week as wolves/bolton/wiggin/b'burn/QPR play musical chairs - swapping places up and down?Worthy4England wrote:
That's fine, take a few minutes, but I'll give you a clue.
It's not about how we do against each other, it's about how we do overall.
The point I was making was that plenty would say Kean is shite, but wouldn't say Coyle was shite when measured by the same yardstick. They start waffling aimlessly about how the price of eggs has affected Coyle's season, the impact the US crop reports might have had. In fact anything other than the things that actually count. How he's getting our squad to play like they actually meet each other between matches.
You would of course only need to change your mind as to who was the better Manager, should the forecast of musical chairs actually occur.

Re: Time to go (2)
you must have played an odd version of musical chairs!! in the version we played - nobody owns a chair - they are all up for grabs when the music stops!!Worthy4England wrote:oh - I agree. I'm just not convinced yet, that our chair hasn't already been removed!!thebish wrote:oh - I predict there will be plenty of musical chairs over the next 11 or so games!!Worthy4England wrote:I don't think there's a whole lot in it TBH.thebish wrote:hmmm... true in the grand scheme of things - but would that mean that in the run-in to the season's close, you'd have to change your mind as to who was a better manager week by week as wolves/bolton/wiggin/b'burn/QPR play musical chairs - swapping places up and down?Worthy4England wrote:
That's fine, take a few minutes, but I'll give you a clue.
It's not about how we do against each other, it's about how we do overall.
The point I was making was that plenty would say Kean is shite, but wouldn't say Coyle was shite when measured by the same yardstick. They start waffling aimlessly about how the price of eggs has affected Coyle's season, the impact the US crop reports might have had. In fact anything other than the things that actually count. How he's getting our squad to play like they actually meet each other between matches.
You would of course only need to change your mind as to who was the better Manager, should the forecast of musical chairs actually occur.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Time to go (2)
Yes - and whoever isn't sat down, gets knocked out and one chair gets removed...I think ours got removed in November.thebish wrote:you must have played an odd version of musical chairs!! in the version we played - nobody owns a chair - they are all up for grabs when the music stops!!
Re: Time to go (2)
not sure how this works - unless we were removed from the league in November and I missed it.. are we not allowed to play our last 11 games?Worthy4England wrote:Yes - and whoever isn't sat down, gets knocked out and one chair gets removed...I think ours got removed in November.thebish wrote:you must have played an odd version of musical chairs!! in the version we played - nobody owns a chair - they are all up for grabs when the music stops!!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Time to go (2)
Yes we were removed in November and you missed it. Why do you think we're so angry at Coyle?thebish wrote:not sure how this works - unless we were removed from the league in November and I missed it.. are we not allowed to play our last 11 games?Worthy4England wrote:Yes - and whoever isn't sat down, gets knocked out and one chair gets removed...I think ours got removed in November.thebish wrote:you must have played an odd version of musical chairs!! in the version we played - nobody owns a chair - they are all up for grabs when the music stops!!
Re: Time to go (2)
why do we need a new manager for the remainder of the season then?Worthy4England wrote:Yes we were removed in November and you missed it. Why do you think we're so angry at Coyle?thebish wrote:not sure how this works - unless we were removed from the league in November and I missed it.. are we not allowed to play our last 11 games?Worthy4England wrote:Yes - and whoever isn't sat down, gets knocked out and one chair gets removed...I think ours got removed in November.thebish wrote:you must have played an odd version of musical chairs!! in the version we played - nobody owns a chair - they are all up for grabs when the music stops!!

Re: Time to go (2)
To sneak a fresh chair in
This fella shows no sign that he may possess the wit to come up with a plan to achieve that
This fella shows no sign that he may possess the wit to come up with a plan to achieve that
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Time to go (2)
I suspect this metaphor has been stretched beyond the bounds of metaphor-tolerance!!CAPSLOCK wrote:To sneak a fresh chair in
This fella shows no sign that he may possess the wit to come up with a plan to achieve that

- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Time to go (2)
Nowt like starting the rebuilding programme early.thebish wrote:why do we need a new manager for the remainder of the season then?Worthy4England wrote:Yes we were removed in November and you missed it. Why do you think we're so angry at Coyle?thebish wrote:not sure how this works - unless we were removed from the league in November and I missed it.. are we not allowed to play our last 11 games?Worthy4England wrote:Yes - and whoever isn't sat down, gets knocked out and one chair gets removed...I think ours got removed in November.thebish wrote:you must have played an odd version of musical chairs!! in the version we played - nobody owns a chair - they are all up for grabs when the music stops!!

Re: Time to go (2)
Lord Kangana wrote:He's doing the majority of the job he was asked to do, ie rescue us from the financial train wreck of the last regime. Anyone who's good with figures will note that whilst Coyle is in profit on his dealings, the income from player sales does not match outlay from the likes of Elmander/Shittu/Taylor/Cahill etc. They represent a substantial, irrecoverable loss to the club. He (or appears to be) replacing these "assets" with more salebale versions. ANd reducing the wage and age of the squad. So far so good.
I have no idea why he didn't stick with the formations that worked in the early part of this year, and I've no idea why we win comfortably one week, then lose miserably for several weeks after. That has me as baffled and frustrated as the next man.
On balance, I don't know of any worthwhile replacement who is willing to work under the constraints of the first paragraph, yet has the demonstrable ability to remedy the second. Its still my belief that the board are, and will, stick with their man. Regardless of our polls.
Go on....
If you think by far and away the maaaajor part of his job isn't keeping us up, you've gone mad. You might argue financial constraints have made it so tough nobody could do it, but his job is to keep us up.
Even so, if his job is to save us from financial ruin, you must know something I don't. Coz 19th and our accounts is not a good combination.
He's fecking shit.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Time to go (2)
Ive just spotted something marginally interesting.
If you look at the first half only league table, we're 15th.
On the second half only table we're 17th.
From that, the only possible conclusion is that we lose it all during the half time team talk and the post match analysis.
Coyle out.
If you look at the first half only league table, we're 15th.
On the second half only table we're 17th.
From that, the only possible conclusion is that we lose it all during the half time team talk and the post match analysis.
Coyle out.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Time to go (2)
I'm not disputing your facts .... but how can it be that ;Worthy4England wrote:Ive just spotted something marginally interesting.
If you look at the first half only league table, we're 15th.
On the second half only table we're 17th.
From that, the only possible conclusion is that we lose it all during the half time team talk and the post match analysis.
Coyle out.
1st Half performances = 15th
2nd Half performnces = 17th
Both halves together = 19th !!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Time to go (2)
Cos for example someone could be 20th for their away record but 5th for their home one and overall have more points than us.bobo the clown wrote:I'm not disputing your facts .... but how can it be that ;Worthy4England wrote:Ive just spotted something marginally interesting.
If you look at the first half only league table, we're 15th.
On the second half only table we're 17th.
From that, the only possible conclusion is that we lose it all during the half time team talk and the post match analysis.
Coyle out.
1st Half performances = 15th
2nd Half performnces = 17th
Both halves together = 19th !!
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31615
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Time to go (2)
Intriguing statistical anomaly... backed up by Stats365 (although they have us 16th in the first half & 18th in the second)
Note that QPR are better than us in the first half, worse in the second... trouble is, we haven't won a single point after being behind at half-time (conversely, we've only dropped two points in the five games where we've gone in ahead)
Only three teams have better records when scoring first, but no team has lost more after conceding first...
Note that QPR are better than us in the first half, worse in the second... trouble is, we haven't won a single point after being behind at half-time (conversely, we've only dropped two points in the five games where we've gone in ahead)
Only three teams have better records when scoring first, but no team has lost more after conceding first...
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Time to go (2)
I appreciate the difficulty in people trying to understand whats happening at our club. But the debt has been increasing year on year. This has to stop with immediate effect. The existing debt has also to be tackled. With immediate effect. Premier League or Championship, you'll see an exodus of players this summer as contracts are not renewed. And we cannot afford another manager. As in can't.Prufrock wrote:
Go on....
If you think by far and away the maaaajor part of his job isn't keeping us up, you've gone mad. You might argue financial constraints have made it so tough nobody could do it, but his job is to keep us up.
Even so, if his job is to save us from financial ruin, you must know something I don't. Coz 19th and our accounts is not a good combination.
He's fecking shit.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1967
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: Time to go (2)
It'd just be nice if he tried to win games while he was doing itLord Kangana wrote:I appreciate the difficulty in people trying to understand whats happening at our club. But the debt has been increasing year on year. This has to stop with immediate effect. The existing debt has also to be tackled. With immediate effect. Premier League or Championship, you'll see an exodus of players this summer as contracts are not renewed. And we cannot afford another manager. As in can't.

The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests