Wanderers v Cottagers

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
steviewander
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:03 pm

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by steviewander » Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:24 pm

Gooner Girl wrote:I'm predicting a 0-0 draw...
Without a doubt

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:28 pm

Gail Platz wrote:It will be really tempting to play KD after his stormer against Wolves but as a couple have pointed out already, he has no chance against Hangeland so I think we should get back to the 4-5-1 again.
Usually a boring game but I'm not too arsed as long as we come away with 3 points.
COYWM!
Hangerland doesn't "own" KD any more than he does any other striker. He's a top class central defender and rarely plays badly. What we need are for the rest to play well,and KD isn't a cert to play yet. COME ON YOU WHITES. :oyea: :oyea:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

immaturefanboy
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by immaturefanboy » Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:45 pm

COYWM
"Halfway across the globe to be a Wanderer."

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by thebish » Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:46 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Gail Platz wrote:It will be really tempting to play KD after his stormer against Wolves but as a couple have pointed out already, he has no chance against Hangeland so I think we should get back to the 4-5-1 again.
Usually a boring game but I'm not too arsed as long as we come away with 3 points.
COYWM!
Hangerland doesn't "own" KD any more than he does any other striker. He's a top class central defender and rarely plays badly.

I think Hangeland has moire trouble against a pacy striker who takes the ball to his feet, runs the line and and whose pace takes him through an offside trap than he does against a striker whose main threat is winning aerial ball...

so - I suspect he does (unfortunately) "own" KD more than he does some other strikers...

that's not to say KD might not have a part to play in this game - I just hope it's not as a starter..

do you want coyle to start with KD?

COYW!!!!

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:00 pm

thebish wrote: do you want coyle to start with KD?COYW!!!!
Yes, because, like it or no, we do play areiel ball and N'gog isn' the best with that. Fulham have a better midfield than us and 4-4-2 isn't the best idea. That's why ariel will be the order of the day and Davies at least will keep defenders occupied and then bring a fresh striker on later when we, maybe, start to come forward with the ball. Then again, what I want won't have any bearing anyway.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Turkish Trotter
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1861
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by Turkish Trotter » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:03 pm

OfficialBWFC: BWFC: Bogdan, Ricketts, Wheater, Ream, Alonso, Reo-Coker, Pratley, M Davies, Petrov, Ryo, Ngog [via Twitter]
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!

Turkish Trotter
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1861
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by Turkish Trotter » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:03 pm

OfficialBWFC: BWFC Subs: Jaaskelainen, Steinsson, Eagles, Knight, K Davies, Klasnic, Sordell [via Twitter]
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!

User avatar
Little Green Man
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4471
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Justin Edinburgh

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by Little Green Man » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:10 pm

Time for a top drawer performance, Senor Alonso.

elfil76
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 545
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:07 pm

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by elfil76 » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:10 pm

Seriously what happen to tuncay? Nothing anyone

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by thebish » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:12 pm

SURELY Ngog will score one day?? be nice if it was today!!

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:14 pm

elfil76 wrote:Seriously what happen to tuncay? Nothing anyone
Have to hope it's injury keeping him out because, if not, he must be seriously pxssed off.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:15 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
elfil76 wrote:Seriously what happen to tuncay? Nothing anyone
Have to hope it's injury keeping him out because, if not, he must be seriously pxssed off.

and who'd blame him

it's absolute crimnal
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

Porrohman
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 846
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:35 pm

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by Porrohman » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:17 pm

elfil76 wrote:Seriously what happen to tuncay? Nothing anyone
He had a haircut? :conf:
The voices in my head may not be real...but they have some great ideas!

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31613
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:24 pm

Tuncay: we've three forwards on the bench, including our top scorer, club captain (two in two) and pacy £4m youngster. We're also, notably correctly, playing one up top and as an advanced midfielder Tuncay is at least third choice to Mavies and Pratley - and Coyle has previously played Eagles there, so Tuncay is arguably fourth-choice linkman and fifth-choice striker. Not saying that's right but it seems to be the case.

Sensible selection for our best choice of three points this weekend. Good luck Marcos, good luck Wanderers, COYWM.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by thebish » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:27 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
elfil76 wrote:Seriously what happen to tuncay? Nothing anyone
Have to hope it's injury keeping him out because, if not, he must be seriously pxssed off.

and who'd blame him

it's absolute crimnal
who would you suggest taking off the bench or out of the starting lineup to accommodate Tuncay?

(be careful of saying Sordell - cos there has been a campaign for his inclusion elsewhere on the forum!) :wink:

Turkish Trotter
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1861
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by Turkish Trotter » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:33 pm

The annoying thing is 3 forwards, 2 defenders and 1 midfielder on bench. We won't use any more than 2 of the forwards so 1 is pointless being there. I know we are short of midfielders but surely a youngster would be better, then if someone gets injured, at least we have a replacement instead of changing the system.
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:43 pm

thebish wrote:
plymouth wanderer wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
elfil76 wrote:Seriously what happen to tuncay? Nothing anyone
Have to hope it's injury keeping him out because, if not, he must be seriously pxssed off.

and who'd blame him

it's absolute crimnal
who would you suggest taking off the bench or out of the starting lineup to accommodate Tuncay?

(be careful of saying Sordell - cos there has been a campaign for his inclusion elsewhere on the forum!) :wink:

im not referring to this game im on about the season as whole

tuncay has't had any real chance to show what he could do and on the odd occasion where he's managed to get on coyles played him right wing

if sparky does't play well today i would put tuncay there....in you know his natural position

just dont think lad has has a fair crack of the wip
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

pagey_BWFC
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:25 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by pagey_BWFC » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:44 pm

Turkish Trotter wrote:The annoying thing is 3 forwards, 2 defenders and 1 midfielder on bench. We won't use any more than 2 of the forwards so 1 is pointless being there. I know we are short of midfielders but surely a youngster would be better, then if someone gets injured, at least we have a replacement instead of changing the system.
But we already saw last week that Coyle would rather change the formation then play a inexperienced midfielder. No point wasting a spot on the bench if there is no chance he will use them. With the 3 forwards on the bench, they all offer something different so it gives Coyle options for later in the game...I'm ok with it to be honest.

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:44 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Sensible selection for our best choice of three points this weekend. Good luck Marcos, good luck Wanderers, COYWM.
+1

Who do they have on that side? Duff?
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

Turkish Trotter
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1861
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Wanderers v Cottagers

Post by Turkish Trotter » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:45 pm

pagey_BWFC wrote:
Turkish Trotter wrote:The annoying thing is 3 forwards, 2 defenders and 1 midfielder on bench. We won't use any more than 2 of the forwards so 1 is pointless being there. I know we are short of midfielders but surely a youngster would be better, then if someone gets injured, at least we have a replacement instead of changing the system.
But we already saw last week that Coyle would rather change the formation then play a inexperienced midfielder. No point wasting a spot on the bench if there is no chance he will use them. With the 3 forwards on the bench, they all offer something different so it gives Coyle options for later in the game...I'm ok with it to be honest.

Sordell ????????????????
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests