Spuds at Home

wanderers_on_tour · Post by **wanderers_on_tour** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:37 pm

A draw would do me fine, would leave me at nerves end for the West Brom game but if we can get 3 there I reckon we're safe. Wouldn't be surprised to see us take all 3 at Stoke n all but it's not the place you want to go without having already secured Premier league survival.

Post by **DJBlu** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:59 pm

Need to get points on the board.

To get 3 points out of this game would be great, 1 would be good, 0 would be a nightmare.

COYWM!!

Ianmooreslovechild · Post by **Ianmooreslovechild** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:59 pm

wanderers_on_tour wrote:A draw would do me fine, would leave me at nerves end for the West Brom game but if we can get 3 there I reckon we're safe. Wouldn't be surprised to see us take all 3 at Stoke n all but it's not the place you want to go without having already secured Premier league survival.

A win would be good.Cant see it being a draw somehow but as someone said elsewhere the prospect of an open 442 v spurs is very scary indeed

si2008 · Post by **si2008** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:11 pm

need a result against spurs,,,after tonights result, qpr have a one game season left,(if city beat newcastle) home to stoke..cant see them going to city and getting a win if city going for premiership..so it all in our own hands now

Worthy4England · Post by **Worthy4England** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:16 pm

keveh wrote:
Jez wrote:Spurs havent won an away game in 2012

Spurs havent won at the reebok ever

This is ours for the taking, if we keep up the fight we've been showing recently then we can take all 3 points
That is almost worthy of a ban!

100% loss for us now, we bloody love to help teams break their bad records.

Domed, utterly and hopelessly domed.

P.O.S. · Post by **P.O.S.** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:28 pm

Forget everything, Wanderers, and rumble these bastards.

ChrisC · Post by **ChrisC** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:52 pm

si2008 wrote:need a result against spurs,,,after tonights result, qpr have a one game season left,(if city beat newcastle) home to stoke..cant see them going to city and getting a win if city going for premiership..so it all in our own hands now

Even if City lose at Newcastle they will still go for it against QPR because they would only be 3 behind Manure worst case senario.. they would need to win and hope united drop points last game..

Either way now QPR have the Stoke game to make there mark or it is goodbye..

Salford Trotter · Post by **Salford Trotter** » Tue May 01, 2012 12:03 am

ChrisC wrote:
si2008 wrote:need a result against spurs,,,after tonights result, qpr have a one game season left,(if city beat newcastle) home to stoke..cant see them going to city and getting a win if city going for premiership..so it all in our own hands now
Even if City lose at Newcastle they will still go for it against QPR because they would only be 3 behind Manure worst case senario.. they would need to win and hope united drop points last game..

Either way now QPR have the Stoke game to make there mark or it is goodbye..

Swansea at OT will be no push over as they proved at our place, granted the difference in quality. Its a shame the the goal difference between the Manchester teams isn't closer as City wouldn't take the foot off the gas if it were and I sensed Chelsea did just that on Sunday

Jez · Post by **Jez** » Tue May 01, 2012 12:15 am

Salford Trotter wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
si2008 wrote:need a result against spurs,,,after tonights result, qpr have a one game season left,(if city beat newcastle) home to stoke..cant see them going to city and getting a win if city going for premiership..so it all in our own hands now
Even if City lose at Newcastle they will still go for it against QPR because they would only be 3 behind Manure worst case senario.. they would need to win and hope united drop points last game..

Either way now QPR have the Stoke game to make there mark or it is goodbye..
Swansea at OT will be no push over as they proved at our place, granted the difference in quality. Its a shame the the goal difference between the Manchester teams isn't closer as City wouldn't take the foot off the gas if it were and I sensed Chelsea did just that on Sunday

City wont be taking their foot of the gas until they hold the title mathematically which they cannot do until the QPR game

Salford Trotter · Post by **Salford Trotter** » Tue May 01, 2012 12:20 am

Jez wrote:
Salford Trotter wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
si2008 wrote:need a result against spurs,,,after tonights result, qpr have a one game season left,(if city beat newcastle) home to stoke..cant see them going to city and getting a win if city going for premiership..so it all in our own hands now
Even if City lose at Newcastle they will still go for it against QPR because they would only be 3 behind Manure worst case senario.. they would need to win and hope united drop points last game..

Either way now QPR have the Stoke game to make there mark or it is goodbye..
Swansea at OT will be no push over as they proved at our place, granted the difference in quality. Its a shame the the goal difference between the Manchester teams isn't closer as City wouldn't take the foot off the gas if it were and I sensed Chelsea did just that on Sunday
City wont be taking their foot of the gas until they hold the title mathematically which they cannot do until the QPR game

My point being that if City beat the Geordies and Man U beat the Swansea by similar results then they go into the final game 7 or 8 goals better in GD. So if City are coasting 3 - 0 against QPR the title is theirs hence the temptation to take their proverbial the foot of the gas. Any how what will be will be

Relentless09 · Post by **Relentless09** » Tue May 01, 2012 8:14 am

It's a big ask for QPR to match our goal difference and it's unlikely to happen, we have 9 available points left, mathematically we need 7 but 4 could probably do

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Tue May 01, 2012 11:18 am

Pratleys out.

NRC is a doubt.
Eagles is a doubt.
Steinsson is a doubt.

Bloody hell. Take NRC out and we may aswell agree a 3-0 defeat with Spurs and not bother.

bobo the clown · Post by **bobo the clown** » Tue May 01, 2012 11:24 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:Pratleys out.

NRC is a doubt.
Eagles is a doubt.
Steinsson is a doubt.

Bloody hell. Take NRC out and we may aswell agree a 3-0 defeat with Spurs and not bother.

OMG, Pratley still missing !!

(though, & I never thought I'd say this, given what we have he'd actually give us something I s'pose)

ohjimmyjimmy · Post by **ohjimmyjimmy** » Tue May 01, 2012 11:24 am

Two of them will play im sure, unless they're upgraded to 'major doubt' !

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Tue May 01, 2012 11:26 am

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Two of them will play im sure, unless they're upgraded to 'major doubt' !

I suspect so too....

Its gonna have to be 4-4-2 though....

ohjimmyjimmy · Post by **ohjimmyjimmy** » Tue May 01, 2012 11:29 am

I will wear my brown trousers, in that case.

Bruce Rioja · Post by **Bruce Rioja** » Tue May 01, 2012 11:39 am

Get Sean Davis in

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Tue May 01, 2012 11:40 am

If NRC is out we are bollocksed. No fecker else can tackle!

Come in Number whatever number Josh Vela is.

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Tue May 01, 2012 11:41 am

Oh fu....

NiceHotCuppaTea · Post by **NiceHotCuppaTea** » Tue May 01, 2012 11:41 am

Looks like Vela's getting a start then!

Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Re: Spuds at Home

Who is online

Connect with your social network account

Who is online