Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36444
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
I'll pick a couple of non controversial ones, he signed Cahill and Lee.jaffka wrote:Looks like I have forgotten, so remind me then please, what were his good points?BWFC_Insane wrote:But again, its not that anybody thinks Megson is anywhere close to Allardyce in terms of ability as a manager.Lord Kangana wrote:I think it wouldn't stick in the craw (or indeed be such a one-dimensional argument) if the same cabal of posters who consistently berate Allardyce simultaneously defend Megson (for they are one and the same, and we are expanding the argument).
After all, its surely a better thing to be a fat headed egotistical arrogant cock and be good at football management, than be a fat headed, egotistical, arrogant cock, and be shit at football management. Especially, and for me this is a crucial, central point, when you're in football management. No?
I don't think you'll find ANYONE to say they'd rather have Megson than Allardyce. NOT ONE.
I think you'll find when Caps and others including myself "defended" Megson to use your words it was to merely point out that he had kept us in the premiership and that the likelihood is that there wasn't another man capable of repeating what Allardyce did.
We can go back and forth over Megson etc and probably get nowhere, mainly because your position became so entrenched that you don't want to apply any reason to it. I certainly could see his massive faults, but also his good points. Which perhaps you didn't or wouldn't let yourself.
Perhaps I did the same with Coyle.
End result is that nowt is as black or as white in reality as it is portrayed on here.
And kept us in the prem when we looked fooked at several points.
Oh and Munich.....
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
So nothing about his personality then?BWFC_Insane wrote:I'll pick a couple of non controversial ones, he signed Cahill and Lee.jaffka wrote:Looks like I have forgotten, so remind me then please, what were his good points?BWFC_Insane wrote:But again, its not that anybody thinks Megson is anywhere close to Allardyce in terms of ability as a manager.Lord Kangana wrote:I think it wouldn't stick in the craw (or indeed be such a one-dimensional argument) if the same cabal of posters who consistently berate Allardyce simultaneously defend Megson (for they are one and the same, and we are expanding the argument).
After all, its surely a better thing to be a fat headed egotistical arrogant cock and be good at football management, than be a fat headed, egotistical, arrogant cock, and be shit at football management. Especially, and for me this is a crucial, central point, when you're in football management. No?
I don't think you'll find ANYONE to say they'd rather have Megson than Allardyce. NOT ONE.
I think you'll find when Caps and others including myself "defended" Megson to use your words it was to merely point out that he had kept us in the premiership and that the likelihood is that there wasn't another man capable of repeating what Allardyce did.
We can go back and forth over Megson etc and probably get nowhere, mainly because your position became so entrenched that you don't want to apply any reason to it. I certainly could see his massive faults, but also his good points. Which perhaps you didn't or wouldn't let yourself.
Perhaps I did the same with Coyle.
End result is that nowt is as black or as white in reality as it is portrayed on here.
And kept us in the prem when we looked fooked at several points.
Oh and Munich.....
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14101
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
He got lucky in munich. He played Gerald Cid ffs!
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
We wont get a reply for a while as he will be working up to the vinegar stroke whilst wearing a ginger wig.officer_dibble wrote:He got lucky in munich. He played Gerald Cid ffs!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36444
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
A managers personality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
Really?BWFC_Insane wrote:A managers personality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
I disagree, I think that a personality is essential on how people interact.
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
BWFC_Insane wrote:A managers personality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
Megson
Coyle
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36444
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
The fans perception of personality is irrelevant.jaffka wrote:Really?BWFC_Insane wrote:A managers personality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
I disagree, I think that a personality is essential on how people interact.
How they work and deal with players and issues is important.
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
So personality is important then?BWFC_Insane wrote:The fans perception of personality is irrelevant.jaffka wrote:Really?BWFC_Insane wrote:A managers personality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
I disagree, I think that a personality is essential on how people interact.
How they work and deal with players and issues is important.
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
just BWFCi please...jaffka wrote:So personality is important then?BWFC_Insane wrote:The fans perception of personality is irrelevant.jaffka wrote:Really?BWFC_Insane wrote:A managers personality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
I disagree, I think that a personality is essential on how people interact.
How they work and deal with players and issues is important.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36444
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
Define what you mean by personality.....jaffka wrote:So personality is important then?BWFC_Insane wrote:The fans perception of personality is irrelevant.jaffka wrote:Really?BWFC_Insane wrote:A managers personality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
I disagree, I think that a personality is essential on how people interact.
How they work and deal with players and issues is important.
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
Is personality important? answer the question.BWFC_Insane wrote:Define what you mean by personality.....jaffka wrote:So personality is important then?BWFC_Insane wrote:The fans perception of personality is irrelevant.jaffka wrote:Really?BWFC_Insane wrote:A managers personality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
I disagree, I think that a personality is essential on how people interact.
How they work and deal with players and issues is important.
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
I'm sure he means exactly what you meant when you used the word - The combination of characteristics or qualities that form an individual's distinctive character.BWFC_Insane wrote: Define what you mean by personality.....
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
I do as well. Just getting him to admit it though is always nice.thebish wrote:I'm sure he means exactly what you meant when you used the word - The combination of characteristics or qualities that form an individual's distinctive character.BWFC_Insane wrote: Define what you mean by personality.....
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36444
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
I'd say given that a whole variety of personality types have made good managers, there isn't much evidence that it is.
It very much depends on what you define as personality. Man management and group management skills are important. As are motivational abilities.
Do they count as personality? Not for me because they can be learned.
Personality is not a learned trait, its just how you are.
It very much depends on what you define as personality. Man management and group management skills are important. As are motivational abilities.
Do they count as personality? Not for me because they can be learned.
Personality is not a learned trait, its just how you are.
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
So now what you are saying is that it is important how you interact with people but that is nothing to do with personality?BWFC_Insane wrote:I'd say given that a whole variety of personality types have made good managers, there isn't much evidence that it is.
It very much depends on what you define as personality. Man management and group management skills are important. As are motivational abilities.
Do they count as personality? Not for me because they can be learned.
Personality is not a learned trait, its just how you are.
-
- Promising
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 1:24 pm
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
Absolute balls. No manager who alienates pretty much every "customer" (in footbiz speak, apologies) they have can expect to be judged a success. And it was that alienation turning into lower and lower gates, and such bad feeling in the crowds that were left, that forced gartside's trigger finger. Equally, "the people's man" OC tried the polar opposite it seems, of trotting out all the niceties, but not having a clue when it came to sorting out the football side of things. What's needed is balance.BWFC_Insane wrote:The fans perception of personality is irrelevant.jaffka wrote:Really?BWFC_Insane wrote:A managers personality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
I disagree, I think that a personality is essential on how people interact.
How they work and deal with players and issues is important.
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
Do we leave this one as BWFCi outed for speaking more shite then?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36444
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
So in conclusion, personality is irrelevant it's results that count?midlands exile wrote:Absolute balls. No manager who alienates pretty much every "customer" (in footbiz speak, apologies) they have can expect to be judged a success. And it was that alienation turning into lower and lower gates, and such bad feeling in the crowds that were left, that forced gartside's trigger finger. Equally, "the people's man" OC tried the polar opposite it seems, of trotting out all the niceties, but not having a clue when it came to sorting out the football side of things. What's needed is balance.BWFC_Insane wrote:The fans perception of personality is irrelevant.jaffka wrote:Really?BWFC_Insane wrote:A managers personality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
I disagree, I think that a personality is essential on how people interact.
How they work and deal with players and issues is important.
Glad we've sorted that out!
Re: Allardyce piece in the London Evening Standard
BWFCi is one of those types you pray to God aren't in a meeting one is attending! ![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 76 guests