Time to go

[thebish]

I believe eddie's stipulations are that there have to be at least 2 Davies's in the team or we have to pay it all back in a week...

this is why KD is playing and why MD is not for sale... it is also why we bought SD (Eddie allows spelling variations)

[Lord Kangana]

...A trust can last for up to 120 years in some jurisdictions

So, put plainly ... by 2142 we fckd. Right !!

I think you'd be safer sticking to economics

[bobo the clown]

...A trust can last for up to 120 years in some jurisdictions

So, put plainly ... by 2142 we fckd. Right !!

I think you'd be safer sticking to economics

Maybe we hang on, doing a Pompey, for 10 years or so.

I'll shut up now !!

[Wandering Willy]

Reet - I gave myself a couple of days after Derby to avoid a knee jerk reaction.

I was feckin' livid when I saw that team sheet. 4-4-2 with KD up front. KD did not deserve to start at Burnley after a shit pre season, and certainly should have been nowhere near the starting line up against Derby.

Now KD has finally bagged one I fear we'll be seeing his name week in and week out. The goals will be sparse but his appearances will not be.

We dodged a bullet on Tuesday but we'll not keep winning with a 4-4-2 with Davies in.

I'm on the brink with this fellah now - get the right players out there in the right set up FFS.

[plymouth wanderer]

Reet - I gave myself a couple of days after Derby to avoid a knee jerk reaction.

I was feckin' livid when I saw that team sheet. 4-4-2 with KD up front. KD did not deserve to start at Burnley after a shit pre season, and certainly should have been nowhere near the starting line up against Derby.

Now KD has finally bagged one I fear we'll be seeing his name week in and week out. The goals will be sparse but his appearances will not be.

We dodged a bullet on Tuesday but we'll not keep winning with a 4-4-2 with Davies in.

I'm on the brink with this fellah now - get the right players out there in the right set up FFS.

Agreed

[mummywhycantieatcrayons]

I thought that was what BWFci was saying was said at the Fan's Forum?

And am I not right in saying that Bolton Wanderer's would have to pay tax on the money as income (rather than none at the moment, because its a loan) if the company is closed with the debt outstanding?

When BWFCI posted what Garty said, my initial thought was "that sounds carefully worded".

Why would they close the Company with the debt outstanding? If it's a Trust, it can remain in place for up to 120 years in some jurisdictions, or until the Terms of the Trust have been met. It has no obligation to make a profit and as it doesn't have to produce Accounts of any real meaning, so who knows what's in the box?....It's not like a proper Company.

Where have you got this figure of 120 years from? Trusts do not have an automatic limitation/expiry period in the UK and indeed I can think of several active trusts that were set up earlier than 120 years ago.

[Worthy4England]

I thought that was what BWFci was saying was said at the Fan's Forum?

And am I not right in saying that Bolton Wanderer's would have to pay tax on the money as income (rather than none at the moment, because its a loan) if the company is closed with the debt outstanding?

When BWFCI posted what Garty said, my initial thought was "that sounds carefully worded".

Why would they close the Company with the debt outstanding? If it's a Trust, it can remain in place for up to 120 years in some jurisdictions, or until the Terms of the Trust have been met. It has no obligation to make a profit and as it doesn't have to produce Accounts of any real meaning, so who knows what's in the box?....It's not like a proper Company.

Where have you got this figure of 120 years from? Trusts do not have an automatic limitation/expiry period in the UK and indeed I can think of several active trusts that were set up earlier than 120 years ago.

Depends on the governing law in the location where the Trust is set up in. We're talking offshore trusts, so UK law isn't the Applicable Law. I'm struggling to think of any offshore jurisdictions that allow for more than 120 years, but happy to be corrected on that one.

[BWFC_Insane]

Reet - I gave myself a couple of days after Derby to avoid a knee jerk reaction.

I was feckin' livid when I saw that team sheet. 4-4-2 with KD up front. KD did not deserve to start at Burnley after a shit pre season, and certainly should have been nowhere near the starting line up against Derby.

Now KD has finally bagged one I fear we'll be seeing his name week in and week out. The goals will be sparse but his appearances will not be.

We dodged a bullet on Tuesday but we'll not keep winning with a 4-4-2 with Davies in.

I'm on the brink with this fellah now - get the right players out there in the right set up FFS.

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wa ... st_flames/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?

Just to be clear here the plan to hit it long to Davies was deliberate and by instruction.

And doesn't seem to be any sign of us not doing that.

Fine if it works I suppose but for me we've built a team suited to playing in a different way, but are reverting to using Davies as a target man again.

Have to say confusion is the only way I can describe my feelings towards it....

[bobo the clown]

"Davies ... accepts the team are still trying to work out their best route of attack.

Wanderers were criticised in some quarters ... for playing too much direct football – but the captain argues that approach will bring results, if his team-mates can pick up the pieces around him".

Oh ...... My ..... God !!!

[Wandering Willy]

I think I’d won about 90 per cent of my headers

They're not much use if they go out for a throw in or you give 'em the ball back.

Maybe I could pull a few more down on my chest and play a bit more

You've been trying that for a few years now. You're not going to get any better.

Some will sing "Super Kev" though if you manage to poke one in in the next few weeks.

[Worthy4England]

I think I’d won about 90 per cent of my headers

They're not much use if they go out for a throw in or you give 'em the ball back.

Maybe I could pull a few more down on my chest and play a bit more

You've been trying that for a few years now. You're not going to get any better.

Some will sing "Super Kev" though if you manage to poke one in in the next few weeks.

He is our current top goalscorer!

[Wandering Willy]

There's more chance of me poking one in in the next few weeks.

And it's been a while.

[Dave Sutton's barnet]

Nowt wrong with supporting those on the pitch. It does nowt to catcall the folks who've been picked, whether it's Kev, Mixu or Ju Darby. If there's a problem with the manager, don't take it out on his selections.

[Worthy4England]

There's more chance of me poking one in in the next few weeks.

And it's been a while.

Hat trick tonight.

You're just such a pessimistic bugger.

[Wandering Willy]

Bet you those 10 internet pies.

[Worthy4England]

Bet you those 10 internet pies.

I've scoffed the buggers.

And I might be lying.

[BWFC_Insane]

It's not Kevin Davies' fault, that a) he is picked and b) Coyle has decided to revert to the Sam Allardyce method when we are actually in a league where we could possibly get somewhere playing football.

What frustrates me is that he seems to think you have to play direct in this league to get results.

My point to him would be, we might have had more joy doing this last season, when admittedly we had limited quality compared to plenty of the sides we had to play.

However as for the league we are in now we have some good quality especially attacking wise, it seems backwards to revert to a style we used to use to upset the big boys in the premiership once upon a time....

[Wandering Willy]

It's Kevin Davies's fault that he cannot run more than 10 feet, cannot trap a bag of sand and needs half an hour to find a team mate.

[TANGODANCER]

It's Kevin Davies's fault that he cannot run more than 10 feet, cannot trap a bag of sand and needs half an hour to find a team mate.

All despite his ball-winning, linking up with Afobe (his chipped pass that put him thorough for a goal he should have scored), and contributing the dead-lock breaking goal himself? I can understand if you don't like KD, but surely that's over the top?

[Dave Sutton's barnet]

It's Kevin Davies's fault that he cannot run more than 10 feet, cannot trap a bag of sand and needs half an hour to find a team mate.

Is it? Or is it age?

Will, I'd be as happy as most to see KD replaced by a younger, more mobile striker, who would fit in with a better style of football. But he keeps getting picked, and he's not going to decline the invitation, even if he's declining in mobility, ability and efficiency. Actually, there's a case to say his efficiency isn't on the wane, considering he's scored four in six...