The other dingles

[Worthy4England]

[danhorwich]

BTW Worthy I was only joking I am not going to intentionally post more frequently for the sake of a post count and a picture of Super John instead of Joe Riley next to my name. I know most of you would struggle with a triple dosage of Dan.

[Prufrock]

I'm sure admin can sort it. No offence, but I reckon the chances of somebody trying to break into your account and steal your identity are pretty slim.

[danhorwich]

No I doubt anybody would want to be me - for starters they would have to support Bolton! I have obviously tried to get back in but to know avail so made a new account.

[jaffka]

I'm sure admin can sort it. No offence, but I reckon the chances of somebody trying to break into your account and steal your identity are pretty slim.

[danhorwich]

And who might that character be?

[LeverEnd]

Don't ask Dan! He's not being complimentary.

[danhorwich]

No go one I will see the funny side, I have learnt from the incident with Bruce where he put that silly gauntless character up.

[Andy Waller]

Does anyone else get the feeling he's going to go with entirely a different set up, to try to prove that the two up front wasn't the reason we beat Watford?

[gavlat2872]

Does anyone else get the feeling he's going to go with entirely a different set up, to try to prove that the two up front wasn't the reason we beat Watford?

im thinking exactly the same mate, i would love it if he actually played the same team. However, i reckon i'll be slightly dissapointed when i see the lineup

[Wandering Willy]

The bearings on the tombola machine are being greased as we speak.

[Worthy4England]

The bearings on the tombola machine are being greased as we speak.

He already picked this team, somewhere between 3 and 6 weeks ago, apparently.

[Wandering Willy]

It's for the Blackpool game.

[Worthy4England]

Oh good! I'd only play one up top for that one - they're on a good run.

Interesting in his post-match comments on Watford, that he singled Danns out amongst others for praise - maybe he forgot, that he hadn't actually picked him 6 weeks ago.

[bobo the clown]

Does anyone else get the feeling he's going to go with entirely a different set up, to try to prove that the two up front wasn't the reason we beat Watford?

im thinking exactly the same mate, i would love it if he actually played the same team. However, i reckon i'll be slightly dissapointed when i see the lineup

Which woukd be his 'Wigan moment'.

It'd be like Groundhog Day.

Still, let's not condemn him till he actually does it.

& hey ..... ↑↑↑↑ .... you two, stop with the semi-quotes already. That's just so unfair.

[jaffka]

This picking the team 6 weeks ago though is totally ridiculous, what the hell is he thinking of doing that?

[Bruce Rioja]

Well, I'm happy to see us not start with Pratley.

[Prufrock]

Yep, cant think of a single area in which I'd say Pratley is a notable improvement on Danns, other than aerial ability at set pieces, which isn't usually high on the list of preferred attributes for your lads at the front end of a diamond.

Danns is pretty good in the air for a titch too!

[Worthy4England]

I think out of all the mysterious "benchings", I've found Danns the most difficult to explain. Really can't understand it at all.

[ChrisC]

I think out of all the mysterious "benchings", I've found Danns the most difficult to explain. Really can't understand it at all.

Completely agree with this. For me, Danns is one of our better players in this league. Runs more than anyone.. more desire than anyone.. creates more than most.. has great feet in tight situations.. braver than every player in the squad. First name on the team sheet for me.