2023 Retained List
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- brommers95
- Reliable
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 3:10 pm
2023 Retained List
Will use this thread to post the retained list when it's announced.
Kachunga has already announced his departure from the club and as expected Lloyd Isgrove has also been released.
A reminder of those out of contract this summer:
Kachunga has already announced his departure from the club and as expected Lloyd Isgrove has also been released.
A reminder of those out of contract this summer:
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32381
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
Ahh a farewell to Lloyd too. Been part of the journey, always felt like we were getting 100% from him...Hope he can get his injury sorted and a few more years.
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 6795
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
Izzy gone? Yes, yes he is.
Best of luck to him. Worked his arse off.
Best of luck to him. Worked his arse off.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28628
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: 2023 Retained List
Best of luck to both of them – always welcome as friends. Izzy no surprise at all. Kacha did give himself a chance but probably the right decision. We need an attacker who can be as good an example as him, and lead the press as well as him, but score a bit more often than <checks data> twice in 70 league appearances.
Re: 2023 Retained List
Kachunga got his redemption arc at Wembley and leaves on good terms.
I like Isgrove but he's injured too much for a squad player.
I like Isgrove but he's injured too much for a squad player.
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 6795
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
Evatt trusted him and played him in big games.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 12:22 pmBest of luck to both of them – always welcome as friends. Izzy no surprise at all. Kacha did give himself a chance but probably the right decision. We need an attacker who can be as good an example as him, and lead the press as well as him, but score a bit more often than <checks data> twice in 70 league appearances.
Like you say, he needed more output in terms of raw numbers; but he was "a manager's dream" as they like to say in the press - and also in the press. You get what I mean, he pressed well and the papers would say nice things about his professionalism. This is a stupid language.
As Brommers said, that's a good wedge of money freed up to add goals and assists.
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 6795
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
Apparently Joel Dixon has had five goes at leaving a farewell message, but he keeps dropping his phone.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32381
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
GhostoftheBok wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 12:38 pmApparently Joel Dixon has had five goes at leaving a farewell message, but he keeps dropping his phone.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36077
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
I really liked Isgrove - I think in league two he was one of our better ones. Injuries have caught up with him though. I think without them he'd have made a better contribution.
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 6795
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
Yeah, Izzy was a good un; but I don't think anyone is shocked he's gone.
I was keeping an eye on Kacha in case we made a surprise offer to keep a trusted option in the forward line for the manager to call on, but common sense has prevailed and he's just not scored/made enough goals to justify the wages.
Next up for shocks would be Dixon being retained, but that seems almost cruel.
Then it's the ones people are trying to make serious arguments for. MJ, Lee, Bod and Sheehan.
20 league starts in 18 months for Bod, is it? On his wages that's got to be a massive call if we retain him. Sheehan is on a lot less money, but still only 26 starts. You could see Bod with a wage cut and Sheehan on the basis of recent performances. Both are very good players.
MJ has been fit, but barely featured. Lee has been used whenever fit, but will be 35 and has serious fitness issues.
Keeping any of them will be interesting and come with significant risks.
I was keeping an eye on Kacha in case we made a surprise offer to keep a trusted option in the forward line for the manager to call on, but common sense has prevailed and he's just not scored/made enough goals to justify the wages.
Next up for shocks would be Dixon being retained, but that seems almost cruel.
Then it's the ones people are trying to make serious arguments for. MJ, Lee, Bod and Sheehan.
20 league starts in 18 months for Bod, is it? On his wages that's got to be a massive call if we retain him. Sheehan is on a lot less money, but still only 26 starts. You could see Bod with a wage cut and Sheehan on the basis of recent performances. Both are very good players.
MJ has been fit, but barely featured. Lee has been used whenever fit, but will be 35 and has serious fitness issues.
Keeping any of them will be interesting and come with significant risks.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28628
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: 2023 Retained List
Feels like he was another off-field leader - especially in that first season - at least sociallyBWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 12:55 pmI really liked Isgrove - I think in league two he was one of our better ones. Injuries have caught up with him though. I think without them he'd have made a better contribution.
As noted, we've got some characters to replace. But that's fine. That's the job, and today is our biggest opportunity for clearing spaces to make progress.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28628
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: 2023 Retained List
I agree. It's also true that losing them all would risk leaving ourselves short - in midfield, of depth, and in up front, of probably our second-best striker. Arguably even the one with the best chance of stepping up - although now we really are in classic "arguably" territory, ie the unprovable.GhostoftheBok wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 1:19 pmKeeping any of them will be interesting and come with significant risks.
However, as I say, we need to progress.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36077
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
Bod has not had a career of injuries. This is his first season with them. It’s only a risk if there is a sign his body is breaking down or the injuries have a high risk of repeat. We should have enough information to risk assess that.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32381
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
The question I'm wrestling with is "did we look a completely different, much better, team, with X playing" of the 4 left (Assuming Dixon doesn't make the cut)...For me it's a bit marginal for all of them. We had clamour to start Bod (pre-injury) did we look tons better? Not really, for me.
I think they all fit in and don't really weaken us in L1 terms, but I'm not sure they take us up a level either.
The "proviso" to that is, is what I've seen from Bod, better than what I've seen from our January striker intake - that's be a "yes absolutely"
I think they all fit in and don't really weaken us in L1 terms, but I'm not sure they take us up a level either.
The "proviso" to that is, is what I've seen from Bod, better than what I've seen from our January striker intake - that's be a "yes absolutely"
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 6795
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
I'd still be offering him reduced terms. He was struggling for offers at his current level when we got him and he's not going to get offers like that if he moves on.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 1:25 pmBod has not had a career of injuries. This is his first season with them. It’s only a risk if there is a sign his body is breaking down or the injuries have a high risk of repeat. We should have enough information to risk assess that.
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 6795
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: 2023 Retained List
All this, yes.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 1:22 pmI agree. It's also true that losing them all would risk leaving ourselves short - in midfield, of depth, and in up front, of probably our second-best striker. Arguably even the one with the best chance of stepping up - although now we really are in classic "arguably" territory, ie the unprovable.
However, as I say, we need to progress.
The issue for me is where they play and who (if any) of the loans are coming back next season.
If we are retaining Nlundulu the sales pitch for Dad Bod falls on its face. I think he's great, but he's suddenly not the sort we need if he's being added to Dion, Vik and Dan. Dion, Vik, Bod plus one? Sure.
Sheehan can be added into that midfield, but if we're bringing Shoretire back you're adding two small lads in with three mids who can struggle with the physical game. You can overcome a lot of that with technical play, but not all. That'd mean the 6th midfielder would need to stay fit all season.
If you retain more than two of the four I've no idea how you expect to improve enough to win the league. I've seen people say they want MJ, Sheehan and Lee to all stay. For me that's basically giving up.
Re: 2023 Retained List
I'd let MJ and SK go (and Joel!). Sheehan I would offer squad player wages (I doubt he's currently a top earner, but he was highly rated having been a L2 stand out so I bet it's not peanuts either). Bod would be either release or squad player wages depending on the medical view.
But agree with what Ghost has said re: big Dan. So maybe I would just release Bod. I think there's a player in Dan and *if* we can hook it up, a big asset.
But agree with what Ghost has said re: big Dan. So maybe I would just release Bod. I think there's a player in Dan and *if* we can hook it up, a big asset.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: 2023 Retained List
Shame that some of these players are going. Not necessarily because they were bad, but because they've not progressed to the level we need. Their efforts and performance levels have certainly been a credit to themselves and they'll go on good terms with the fans.
Isgrove, Kacha, etc.
Isgrove for giving is all, Kacha for his semi final and final goals and turning around that red card. They're leaving on a good note.
In terms of who I think is likely to stay, I suspect Dixon and Lee to go. Sheehan, MJ and Dad Bod to be offered terms.
Isgrove, Kacha, etc.
Isgrove for giving is all, Kacha for his semi final and final goals and turning around that red card. They're leaving on a good note.
In terms of who I think is likely to stay, I suspect Dixon and Lee to go. Sheehan, MJ and Dad Bod to be offered terms.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28628
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: 2023 Retained List
If we release Bod and sign Nlundulu, a lot of people will be very worried.... and Bod in exile will become the Icelandic Haaland. Such is the way.
Re: 2023 Retained List
I think that it would be fair to be concerned if we brought in N'lundulu. It's a big ask to get him to become a useful player. Can we realistically carry him to that level knowing Southampton hadn't managed it and little progressed seemed to be made when he was on loan here?Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 1:40 pmIf we release Bod and sign Nlundulu, a lot of people will be very worried.... and Bod in exile will become the Icelandic Haaland. Such is the way.
Shoretire looks set to be released by Man Utd. I wouldn't want him back again, as i'd hope we'd have better options available.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 240 guests