Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

What happens?

Poll ended at Wed Mar 13, 2024 12:29 pm

Bolton win by 2+
7
50%
Bolton win by 1
3
21%
Draw
3
21%
Bolton lose by 1
0
No votes
Bolton lose by 2+
1
7%
 
Total votes: 14

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28594
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Mar 11, 2024 4:49 pm

boltonboris wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2024 4:44 pm
Imagine if we switched shape and got beat. It would be cited as THE reason and the stick to beat him with, even though people are pandering for it
"nOw iTs fOrMaTiOn toMbOla"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36055
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Mar 11, 2024 4:59 pm

boltonboris wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2024 4:44 pm
Imagine if we switched shape and got beat. It would be cited as THE reason and the stick to beat him with, even though people are pandering for it
If we tried to simplify our game and play more economically and lost I’d not criticise Evatt. At least we’d be trying to find a way to win the last 9. I do think as it stands we need to try something different. Because I don’t think we will win the games needed playing the system and style we are. Not with what we’ve got available.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 32370
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:24 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2024 4:12 pm
It's not infeasible that we've been working on a different system but when?

There's 65 days between Sun 7 Jan (Luton away) and Mar 12 (er, tomorrow). In that time we'll have kicked off 20 times – with two abandonments, but those games will have been carefully planned for, affecting training. Post-game, many of the most involved players will have a rest day (say Sunday), then a fairly full training day prepping for the next game (Monday), then very light work, if any, on the matchday Tuesday. Post-midweek it will be similar; they might be able to also do a Friday morning session, but they won't go mad.

We all chuckle about Evatt's #content #download but he's always been a system-based manager. One who, thankfully, is willing to change when necessary... but he will need time "on the grass" to do that. It's possible he could have spent some Friday mornings (say) pointing at magnetic pieces on a whiteboard, but he would want to drill those concepts on the grass – and immediately pre-match, would rather keep players focused on the task imminently at hand rather than a theoretical future world.

I could be wrong - they could pull a big surprise tomorrow or at Derby; it would certainly spanner Warne's scouting, but it would also be a huge huge huge risk for a game of that magnitude.
We've changed systems before in mid-season, when did we work on that one? Dunno.

As it happens, I doubt he'll change what's got us nearby in the first place. So he needs to tighten what's there or get us scoring 3 a game for a win.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28594
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:55 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:24 pm
We've changed systems before in mid-season, when did we work on that one? Dunno.
In his first season, we started with a back four against Crawley on 2 Jan 2021. 10 days later we started with a back three at Exeter.

The change back in 2021/22 was quicker - we lost to Wycombe with a back four in midweek (11 Jan 2022) and beat Ipswich that Saturday (15 Jan) with a back three – but due to a bad winter we'd only played one game in a month prior to Wycombe, so I daresay the manager may have been planning a reversion for a while...
Worthy4England wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:24 pm
As it happens, I doubt he'll change what's got us nearby in the first place. So he needs to tighten what's there or get us scoring 3 a game for a win.
I think "tightening up" is much more achievable than formational change, at least for now. In the break, maybe. (Although I still suspect we haven't got the right personnel at the top end of the pitch to fit the 1 of the 4231... Jerome for an hour then Bod?)

User avatar
DJBlu
Site Admin
Posts: 8641
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:38 pm

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by DJBlu » Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:34 pm

Who's voted Oxford by 2+?

I was tentatively looking forward to another game of guess who? Jekyll and or Hyde.

I do think Evatt must be wondering if the club has an injury hex. He's a religious fella so surely he can ask for help. Is it "The power of Christ compells you?"

If we're needing an exorcism then,

In Mark 9:28-29, Jesus' disciples ask why they could not drive out a demon, and Jesus said that that kind could be driven out only with prayer and fasting.

I've been praying for a while but I'm a bugger for a sandwich so is there anyone willing to skip a meal to rid the injury demons from the club?

User avatar
Mar
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5292
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by Mar » Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:53 am

When this fixture was booked in both ourselves and Oxford were probably flying high. Doubt Sky would've expected our drop off let alone Oxfords.

Still this figure warrants a tough game. Oxford need to win to harbor any hopes of automatics despite it being a long shot. Bolton need to win in order to maintain the automatic chase.

Weve said a draw won't do and all games are must wins, but that's been proven untrue time and again due to the misfortunes of others. Time will tell whether this is a must win game. It certain feels that way, but this is a funny old league and I'm sure were due a few shocks until the end of the season.

We're due a bit of luck and fortune favours the brave. So hopefully we'll be the sort of bold that doesn't get washed out with the clothes cycle.

Win this and we keep ourselves in a title push. Lose and were back to looking over our shoulder rather than onward and upward. A draw suits no one, so we may as well go for it.

Jerome to score the winner. He's certainly warranting one. JDB to be the hero throughout. Clean sheet, dominant performance and a result to put a marker down for the run in. Let's be having it.

User avatar
The_Gun
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3205
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 9:54 am

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by The_Gun » Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:56 am

Is JDC available for tonight's game?

I note that today is his 28th birthday.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24006
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by Prufrock » Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:32 am

He was on the bench Saturday so I assume so. HBJDC!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 32370
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:59 am

If I hear "It's JDC's birthday, so we've let him have the day off. It will not go well." :-)

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by Harry Genshaw » Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:10 am

I expect JDB will start, with Collins playing off him, and the shape will remain the same. I'd be half tempted to flood the midfield and have Morley in there with Paris as the furthest forward and Collins playing as a false 9. Apologies if I've got the vernacular wrong, and he'd really be a trequarista or an inside right.

Whatever. Just win.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28594
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:00 am

Harry Genshaw wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:10 am
I expect JDB will start, with Collins playing off him, and the shape will remain the same. I'd be half tempted to flood the midfield and have Morley in there with Paris as the furthest forward and Collins playing as a false 9. Apologies if I've got the vernacular wrong, and he'd really be a trequarista or an inside right.

Whatever. Just win.
For the record - false 9 is basically the same as a 10 but there's no 9 in front of him, so yeah I think you've used it right. (Trequartista is just a 10, really.)

I think our best 9 is Jerome. It would not astonish me if he starts at Derby to help at defensive set-pieces. JDB can play at 9 but personally I think he's better at 10; however, Collins looks like a 10 as well. Evatt has said Collins can play 9 as well as 10 but (1) Evatt says a lot of things and (2) I'm not convinced on the evidence so far; seems far better facing goal than with his back to it.

Anyway I think you're right Harry - I expect Evatt will choose to start JDB with Collins off him and the shape the same. And IMO that's probably our best option right now (given the risks of a formation switch). Whatever we do I hope it works.

User avatar
The_Gun
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3205
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 9:54 am

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by The_Gun » Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:20 am

Coleman

Toal Santos Iredale

Sheehan

JDC Maghoma Thomason Williams

JDB Collins

User avatar
dave the minion
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 641
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by dave the minion » Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:38 am

Hard to argue with that, other than maybe Jones for JDC if he's still not 100%

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 43223
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:48 am

The_Gun wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:20 am
Coleman

Toal Santos Iredale

Sheehan

JDC Maghoma Thomason Williams

JDB Collins
Might see Dempsey for Williams possibly?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36055
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:57 am

TANGODANCER wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:48 am
The_Gun wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:20 am
Coleman

Toal Santos Iredale

Sheehan

JDC Maghoma Thomason Williams

JDB Collins
Might see Dempsey for Williams possibly?
Dempsey isn’t a wing back!

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28594
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:09 pm

I'm finding it hard to guess for these next two games.

For a home game (rather than away), is JDC a better bet at wingback than Geth?

At LWB, Williams is probably our best attacking option, but do we need to save him a bit for Derby (or do we go more 'solid' there)?

At Derby do we start with Demps over Maghoma (as he's more solid, less risk-taking) or do we go with our very best XI (which probably right now is Maghoma > Demps)?

At least Sheehan's past the yellow-card peril... otherwise you could argue that he could be saved for Derby... or is he a risk against a muscular team?

I genuinely don't know. These are very fine decisions, each with risk/reward. But Saturday is a huge tough game and I would really hope we use our subs wisely tonight. Derby are at home to Reading and you imagine that will be an easier game, mnore quickly won - but this division springs some surprises...

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 32370
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:32 pm

Harry Genshaw wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:10 am
I expect JDB will start, with Collins playing off him, and the shape will remain the same. I'd be half tempted to flood the midfield and have Morley in there with Paris as the furthest forward and Collins playing as a false 9. Apologies if I've got the vernacular wrong, and he'd really be a trequarista or an inside right.

Whatever. Just win.
^^ I've thought similar around this, mainly in terms of Morley. Last time we "tinkered" defensively, I think it was to drop Morley a bit deeper for extra defensive cover. That said, Morley seems pretty much out of favour at the moment and probably hasn't set the world alight when he's played. So I think maybe not.

There's been a lot of narrative about systems and formations and positions that didn't exist in my day when football was just a simple game (allegedly :-) ). There'll be no 'Arrying it on this watch and to be fair, for most of the first part of the season, the system has been fine and dandy. But it misses impetus, forward thrust, quick play, excitement and good to honest "I'm going to die trying-ness." Whilst your winning, that's not maybe much of a problem. When you're not, then it's out there like the Emperor with his sceptre on show but still to all intents and purposes in a state of undress.

I'm going to preface this bit with I like our team, our squad and our manager. I'm not going to boo them (although I reserve the right to tsk). I don't think we'll see a new system - after all, if you have the best system, you can only replace it with a weaker one. The upshot seems to be failure - it's the players (or maybe the manager too, if you happen to like Markham). Success, it's the system. What a gig that is. No downsides, all the upsides. That's the pay-off from the risk-reward equation, it's anything but the system. It's the players, the fans calling the players (so in that instance not the players), the injuries, the atmosphere, the wrong grass and leaves on the track. If only life (even with the best systems in the world) always ran on the tracks. We even had IE questioning his tough four days. Life isn't that fcuking easy mate, so as you might say to young Billy, man up. Get a fcuking grip. Stop with the sob and get on with the job.

Now is the time for the system to shine - brightly - it mitigates the downsides by everyone knowing the drill & patterns and being in possession of both the ball and the content downloads. Whatever we chug about Dion's misses, I'd be delighted with him missing 5 and bagging 2, tonight, because the system put him there and it worked. Frankly you can stick your PPDA, xG and 10 pass sequences where the sun doesn't rise, if it doesn't get us up.

Maybe bizarrely, I'm the one currently sat on 2-0 Whites. COYWM.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36055
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:20 pm

Harry Genshaw wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:10 am
I expect JDB will start, with Collins playing off him, and the shape will remain the same. I'd be half tempted to flood the midfield and have Morley in there with Paris as the furthest forward and Collins playing as a false 9. Apologies if I've got the vernacular wrong, and he'd really be a trequarista or an inside right.

Whatever. Just win.
I like that as an idea. It would rely on us not playing long at all but Oxford home might be the game to do it.

The trouble though is I can’t imagine that would work at Derby though who knows? Maybe we can use Collins as a floating outlet and hit them on the break?

Certainly an interesting idea. A very Man City idea too. So Evatt should like it.

User avatar
The_Gun
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3205
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 9:54 am

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by The_Gun » Tue Mar 12, 2024 2:00 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:09 pm
I'm finding it hard to guess for these next two games.

For a home game (rather than away), is JDC a better bet at wingback than Geth?

At LWB, Williams is probably our best attacking option, but do we need to save him a bit for Derby (or do we go more 'solid' there)?

At Derby do we start with Demps over Maghoma (as he's more solid, less risk-taking) or do we go with our very best XI (which probably right now is Maghoma > Demps)?

At least Sheehan's past the yellow-card peril... otherwise you could argue that he could be saved for Derby... or is he a risk against a muscular team?

I genuinely don't know. These are very fine decisions, each with risk/reward. But Saturday is a huge tough game and I would really hope we use our subs wisely tonight. Derby are at home to Reading and you imagine that will be an easier game, mnore quickly won - but this division springs some surprises...
For me JDC is always a better option than Jones at wing back.

Sheehan is out of yellow card danger, but Thomason would be sucked right back into it if he picks up a booking tonight. We absolutely can't afford for him to miss another three games.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 43223
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Ox on the box, c*cks on the blocks? Oxford (H) Tue 12 Mar, 8pm

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue Mar 12, 2024 3:53 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:57 am
TANGODANCER wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:48 am
The_Gun wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:20 am
Coleman

Toal Santos Iredale

Shee

JDC Maghoma Thomason Williams

JDB Collins
Might see Dempsey for Williams possibly?
Dempsey isn’t a wing back!
Aye, but he's a footballer. Nat Lofthouse wasn't a goal keeper, but he saved a penalty. Dempsey's also creative and under-valued...In my opinion of course...Tell you what, let's cancel all the goals that haven't been scored by strikers, or have some shirts made saying wing-back, mid-fielder etc.. That should do it.. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 234 guests