creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
4 down now. Likely the winners of Lancs/Hants will win the title, though won’t be confirmed until Warwickshire have finished tomorrow. Going to be an excellent last session.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
It’s really tight at the top. Warwickshire in pole position - if they beat somerset, they win the league. If they draw or lose, then the winner of Lancashire and Hampshire will win the league.
Currently lancs need 64 with 6 wickets left in a really low scoring match to win. Hampshire obviously chasing those wickets to win the league.
Warwickshire 367 vs Somerset 389 have only just completed their first innings. There are 4 sessions left so little time to force a result. Guessing Warwickshire will try and score quickly and then bundle somerset out in 2 sessions tomorrow.
I think it’ll be nervy finishes all round.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
jimbo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 23, 2021 3:57 pmIt’s really tight at the top. Warwickshire started these matches in pole position - if they beat somerset, they win the league. If they draw or lose, then the winner of Lancashire and Hampshire will win the league.
Currently lancs need 64 with 6 wickets left in a really low scoring match to win. Hampshire obviously chasing those wickets to win the league.
Warwickshire 367 vs Somerset 389 have only just completed their first innings. There are 4 sessions left so little time to force a result. Guessing Warwickshire will try and score quickly and then bundle somerset out in 2 sessions tomorrow.
I think it’ll be nervy finishes all round.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Aye - couldn't get much closer. Not had chance to look today yet, with work - so thanks for Lancs update...64 with 6 left, just needs one hero.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
feck - 2 runs, 1 wicket left....
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Vilas! Hero, step forwards.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Think Somerset aren't going to do us any favours here...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
4 down and can't see them offering much resistance now.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:29 pmThink Somerset aren't going to do us any favours here...
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Ah well. Only 5 wickets needed.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Great start by Lancy in final Championship match v Warwicks....12-6....(assume this match is the 1 vs 2 game in the current format)...
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
70 all out
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
And Warwickshire in reply are 49-0.
Getting us ready for t'ashes is this!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Stop it, far too early.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Not a bad effort having been 12/6!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
It's grim, down South...Did we bat at a different ground?
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
We need putting out of our misery here. There are 3 bloody days left after this one!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
So, the BBC has chosen to deselect Michael Vaughan from its Ashes coverage team.
It's not often I agree with Piers Morgan, but I'm inclined to here;
So let me get this straight … the BBC has effectively found
@MichaelVaughan
guilty of something he vehemently denies, but has no way to prove he didn’t do, after allegations from someone who spewed anti-Semitic slurs but hasn’t been banned by the BBC. How is this fair?
It's not often I agree with Piers Morgan, but I'm inclined to here;
So let me get this straight … the BBC has effectively found
@MichaelVaughan
guilty of something he vehemently denies, but has no way to prove he didn’t do, after allegations from someone who spewed anti-Semitic slurs but hasn’t been banned by the BBC. How is this fair?
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
They're a bit fcuked whichever way they call it.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 12:57 pmSo, the BBC has chosen to deselect Michael Vaughan from its Ashes coverage team.
It's not often I agree with Piers Morgan, but I'm inclined to here;
So let me get this straight … the BBC has effectively found
@MichaelVaughan
guilty of something he vehemently denies, but has no way to prove he didn’t do, after allegations from someone who spewed anti-Semitic slurs but hasn’t been banned by the BBC. How is this fair?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 108 guests