Criminal Shields Returned to UK Prison

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Batman

Criminal Shields Returned to UK Prison

Post by Batman » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:05 pm

Our prisons are congested enough. If he is convicted abroad, he should be jailed abroad.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/mers ... 176610.stm

Liverpool football fan Michael Shields, who was jailed in Bulgaria for the attempted murder of a barman, is returning to the UK.

Shields is due to fly in to Gatwick airport on Thursday evening to complete his sentence in a UK jail.

Shields was given 10 years after a concrete block was dropped on the barman in 2005. He has always denied any involvement.

Bulgarian officials allowed him to return after a £90,000 fine was paid.

Shields' solicitor told the BBC his client is flying back to the UK and would be taken to Wandsworth Prison.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14101
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Post by boltonboris » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:06 pm

I honestly think he's innocent, but like you said he was convicted abroad (albeit on strange grounds and heresay) so he should be jailed abroad

communistworkethic
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7404
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
Location: in your wife's dreams
Contact:

Post by communistworkethic » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:10 pm

Cue Blurred......................
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely

kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12942
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:16 pm

communistworkethic wrote:Cue Blurred......................
Or me with no Liverpool connection. It is not uncommon to repatriate citizens to complete their sentences in domestic prisons. The theory is a) that the process leading to conviction may have lacked the fairness we expect in our trials (i.e. possible innocence) and b) incarceration in foreign jails might amount to cruel and unusual punishment (depending on the country). This is by no means precedent setting.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14101
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Post by boltonboris » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:17 pm

I'd like to know who paid the 90k though... cue the famous scouse togetherness

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Post by CrazyHorse » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:25 pm

boltonboris wrote:I'd like to know who paid the 90k though... cue the famous scouse togetherness
Yeah, it was funded with the use of a 'whip round'.

The question of his quilt aside, I'm all for him coming over here to serve out the remainder of his sentence. Just as I believe foreign prisoners held in UK prisons should be transported back to their own countries as well.

Edit:
Dunno what his quilt has got to do with it though. :mrgreen:
Guilt goddammit!
Last edited by CrazyHorse on Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Businesswoman of the year.

wovlad
Promising
Promising
Posts: 413
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 10:30 am
Location: Underneath the squeaky floorboard, behind the kitchen dresser

Post by wovlad » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:26 pm

think his conviction was very iffy to say the least. Someone else confessing to it not withstanding. The lad was made to dress like the assailant, locked up in a corridor past whom
the witnesses walked by before the line up. I could go on.

Be interesting to see how many more years he actually completes.
If I should die, think only this of me:
That there's some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12942
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:30 pm

wovlad wrote: Be interesting to see how many more years he actually completes.
That is sometimes part of the repatriation deal. If so, he cannot simply be reprieved else we'd never get another innocent out of Bulgaria.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12942
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:32 pm

CrazyHorse wrote:The question of his quilt aside, I'm all for him coming over here to serve out the remainder of his sentence. Just as I believe foreign prisoners held in UK prisons should be transported back to their own countries as well.
Sending their prisoners back would rather depend upon the crime. Sending a spy back to Russia would rather defeat the purpose of catching him. Sending a terrorist back to Lybia might make him a national hero. Nice quilt, btw. :wink:
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Post by CrazyHorse » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:36 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
CrazyHorse wrote:The question of his quilt aside, I'm all for him coming over here to serve out the remainder of his sentence. Just as I believe foreign prisoners held in UK prisons should be transported back to their own countries as well.
Sending their prisoners back would rather depend upon the crime. Sending a spy back to Russia would rather defeat the purpose of catching him. Sending a terrorist back to Lybia might make him a national hero. Nice quilt, btw. :wink:
Read the edit, smartypants. :mrgreen:

Of course every case would need to be reviewed individually but for "normal-run of the mill" convictions (you know what I mean) it makes sense to have them returned home. As much as anything else it allows the criminal to be within a realistic distance for relatives to visit.
Businesswoman of the year.

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:37 pm

communistworkethic wrote:Cue Blurred......................
:roll: Indeed, how dare I comment on any thread without your permission... :roll:

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12942
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:50 pm

CrazyHorse wrote:
Of course every case would need to be reviewed individually but for "normal-run of the mill" convictions (you know what I mean) it makes sense to have them returned home. As much as anything else it allows the criminal to be within a realistic distance for relatives to visit.
In general I'd agree but even then we have a problem. We get worried that the individual we found guilty of causing an affray or whatever might face cruel and unusual punishment in his homeland. Then we go all soft because we have to be the good guys. In Canada, despite a perfectly good extradition treaty, we do not return people to the US if they face the death sentence.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

Village Idiot
Promising
Promising
Posts: 323
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:30 pm
Location: Barcelona

Post by Village Idiot » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:55 pm

Same here. Dunno if brits are mandated by it, but EU can't extradite prisoners to countries where they could face a death penalty.

About sending prisoners to their countries, problem is that you need to have a standing repatriation treaty with them. You can't just stuff them in a plane and parachute them down to Morocco (or whatever). And you'll find that most countries are perfectly fine with not having more criminals in their prisons.
Last edited by Village Idiot on Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Post by CrazyHorse » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:59 pm

So what we're saying is that is is perhaps only a good idea on paper then? Maybe so.

Of course the flip side (as Batman states) is the deterrent of a foreign jail for committing a crime abroad.
Businesswoman of the year.

Village Idiot
Promising
Promising
Posts: 323
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:30 pm
Location: Barcelona

Post by Village Idiot » Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:05 pm

CrazyHorse wrote:So what we're saying is that is is perhaps only a good idea on paper then? Maybe so.

Of course the flip side (as Batman states) is the deterrent of a foreign jail for committing a crime abroad.
Actually, I honestly believe that deportation would be a great deterrent for foreign criminals, specially for petty crime. Problem is that their countries of origin mostly won't go along with it.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 43356
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Post by TANGODANCER » Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:35 pm

Guilty or no, he's got family and friends. It isn't very fair to expect them to travel abroad to see him. Probably a humanitarian move for the better. Just an aopinion.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Batman

Post by Batman » Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:42 pm

I'm not bothered if he is guilty or not - simple fact is our prisons are overcrowded. Serious crimes are being rewarded with lighter sentences because there simply is NOT space in the prisons to accomdate them. Cases like this mean that a cell is being taken up by someone who should remain abroad.

As far as I am concerned, if you are convicted then you should serve the sentence within the country where the crime was committed. Shields should have stayed in Bulgaria.

David Lee's Hair
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2422
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Cromwell Country

Post by David Lee's Hair » Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:45 pm

Village Idiot wrote:
CrazyHorse wrote:So what we're saying is that is is perhaps only a good idea on paper then? Maybe so.

Of course the flip side (as Batman states) is the deterrent of a foreign jail for committing a crime abroad.
Actually, I honestly believe that deportation would be a great deterrent for foreign criminals, specially for petty crime. Problem is that their countries of origin mostly won't go along with it.
Maybe if you where a turk - if midnight express is to be believed. But back here?? No way the crims will be loving it. minimum security, all the drugs you can get your hands on!! The wags get done for giving you a shoe-in. Keep them out so they know what a prison is really like in my opinion!
Professionalism, the last refuge of the talentless

communistworkethic
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7404
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
Location: in your wife's dreams
Contact:

Post by communistworkethic » Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:56 pm

blurred wrote:
communistworkethic wrote:Cue Blurred......................
:roll: Indeed, how dare I comment on any thread without your permission... :roll:
???? Just pointing out this was one of your favourite victim subjects, and no doubt you would have something to add.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely

kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:23 pm

communistworkethic wrote:???? Just pointing out this was one of your favourite victim subjects, and no doubt you would have something to add.
Of course, I forgot, I mention it all the time, obviously.

And to be honest, no, I haven't, because it's patently not worth the metaphorical waste of oxygen.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 118 guests