Bangladesh v Lancashire

malcd1 · Post by **malcd1** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:51 pm

Lancashire have Bangladash on the ropes. Mahmood, Anderson and Flintoff have taken 6 wickets between them.

Bangladesh are 65-6

superjohnmcginlay · Post by **superjohnmcginlay** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:53 pm

5 wickets the other was a run out.

Soldier_Of_The_White_Army · Post by **Soldier_Of_The_White_Army** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:57 pm

malcd1 wrote:Lancashire have Bangladash on the ropes. Mahmood, Anderson and Flintoff have taken 6 wickets between them.

Bangladesh are 65-6

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH I was waiting to watch this tonight!!

malcd1 · Post by **malcd1** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:57 pm

superjohnmcginlay wrote:5 wickets the other was a run out.

OK Picky. It was a run out off one of the Lancashire bowlers.

malcd1 · Post by **malcd1** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:02 pm

Soldier_Of_The_White_Army wrote:
malcd1 wrote:Lancashire have Bangladash on the ropes. Mahmood, Anderson and Flintoff have taken 6 wickets between them.

Bangladesh are 65-6

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH I was waiting to watch this tonight!!

Sorry SOTWA. I promise not to tell you it is now 77-6.

Nozza · Post by **Nozza** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:05 pm

malcd1 wrote:
superjohnmcginlay wrote:5 wickets the other was a run out.
OK Picky. It was a run out off one of the Lancashire bowlers.

But it doesn't get credited with him.

Anyways, we all know England will collapse and Durhams finest will save us.

Just for SOTWA - 82-6.

Soldier_Of_The_White_Army · Post by **Soldier_Of_The_White_Army** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:06 pm

malcd1 wrote:
Soldier_Of_The_White_Army wrote:
malcd1 wrote:Lancashire have Bangladash on the ropes. Mahmood, Anderson and Flintoff have taken 6 wickets between them.

Bangladesh are 65-6

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH I was waiting to watch this tonight!!

Sorry SOTWA. I promise not to tell you it is now 77-6.

I wouldn't worry malcd1, I'm not stupid enough to click on this thread twice!

communistworkethic · Post by **communistworkethic** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:07 pm

Hoolio wrote:
malcd1 wrote:
superjohnmcginlay wrote:5 wickets the other was a run out.
OK Picky. It was a run out off one of the Lancashire bowlers.
But it doesn't get credited with him.

Anyways, we all know England will collapse and Durhams finest will save us.

Just for SOTWA - 82-6.

Mitch Upton and the Burger King Squad Team Unit Crew???

Nozza · Post by **Nozza** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:09 pm

communistworkethic wrote:
Hoolio wrote:
malcd1 wrote:
superjohnmcginlay wrote:5 wickets the other was a run out.
OK Picky. It was a run out off one of the Lancashire bowlers.
But it doesn't get credited with him.

Anyways, we all know England will collapse and Durhams finest will save us.

Just for SOTWA - 82-6.
Mitch Upton and the Burger King Squad Team Unit Crew???

Just cos Colly looks like a spotty teen, doesn't make him so. Just like - just because you are a big cock, doesn't mean you have one.

communistworkethic · Post by **communistworkethic** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:10 pm

Hoolio wrote:
communistworkethic wrote:
Hoolio wrote:
malcd1 wrote:
superjohnmcginlay wrote:5 wickets the other was a run out.
OK Picky. It was a run out off one of the Lancashire bowlers.
But it doesn't get credited with him.

Anyways, we all know England will collapse and Durhams finest will save us.

Just for SOTWA - 82-6.
Mitch Upton and the Burger King Squad Team Unit Crew???
Just cos Colly looks like a spotty teen, doesn't make him so. Just like - just because you are a big cock, doesn't mean you have one.

but I do all the same.

Nozza · Post by **Nozza** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:11 pm

I'll, erm, take your word for it.

chris · Post by **chris** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:36 pm

We're making very hard work of reaching the target. 112-6 as I write - a very real chance of losing.

Nozza · Post by **Nozza** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:38 pm

Hoolio wrote:
malcd1 wrote:
superjohnmcginlay wrote:5 wickets the other was a run out.
OK Picky. It was a run out off one of the Lancashire bowlers.
But it doesn't get credited with him.

Anyways, we all know England will collapse and Durhams finest will save us.

Just for SOTWA - 82-6.

Soldier_Of_The_White_Army · Post by **Soldier_Of_The_White_Army** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:50 pm

They made bloody hard work of that. If they play like that against South Africa we'll get mullard.

I'm convinced that being Captain is the only thing keeping Vaughan in the side (remind you of anyone else?

) I haven't seen him do anything since his 150 in the Ashes.

warthog · Post by **warthog** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:13 pm

Soldier_Of_The_White_Army wrote:They made bloody hard work of that. If they play like that against South Africa we'll get mullard.

You mean this chap?

Is he a decent batsman?

Soldier_Of_The_White_Army · Post by **Soldier_Of_The_White_Army** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:15 pm

warthog wrote:
Soldier_Of_The_White_Army wrote:They made bloody hard work of that. If they play like that against South Africa we'll get mullard.
You mean this chap?

Is he a decent batsman?

No, but he does play at leftback!

Dr.Karl · Post by **Dr.Karl** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:47 pm

Did anyone else think Paul Nixon's celebration was embarrassing?

The South Africa match should be very interesting on the Barbados pitch, Pollock has been mullered this world cup, may be a different story in Bridgetown.

blurred · Post by **blurred** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:08 pm

Soldier_Of_The_White_Army wrote:They made bloody hard work of that. If they play like that against South Africa we'll get mullard.

Reckon we'll get a few ducks?

Oh, that's mallard.

Batman · Post by **Batman** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 5:43 pm

blurred wrote:
Soldier_Of_The_White_Army wrote:They made bloody hard work of that. If they play like that against South Africa we'll get mullard.
Reckon we'll get a few ducks?

Oh, that's mallard.

Oh dear

malcd1 · Post by **malcd1** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 5:59 pm

Yes we managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Just about scrapped home.

We must be favourites now.