Rant.
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43343
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Rant.
No new debate, but from this mornings Metro:
Greater Manchester is considering a bid to the government for a three billion pound project for traffic control etc. Basically they are looking at massive congestion charges reaching to Bolton, Wigan, Rochdale, Stockport, Leigh, Altrincham etc etc. This will force a lot of people onto an already overcrowded and badly run public transport system just to get to work. Anyone travelling after 9-30 (ie shoppers, daytrippers, footballers wives and Wayne Rooney's bride to be)will not be affected. Bottom line, it will only hit the workers. Great.
I don't drive to work anymore, but I do use public transport. Just to get to Manchester from Bolton and home involves getting
into a survival fight (half the time with holiday travellers and thirty ton of suitcases going to the airport) and very rarely getting a seat. I do however think it most unfair on drivers going to and from work having to pay for the cost of all this. Just another example of government fairness.
Rant over.
Greater Manchester is considering a bid to the government for a three billion pound project for traffic control etc. Basically they are looking at massive congestion charges reaching to Bolton, Wigan, Rochdale, Stockport, Leigh, Altrincham etc etc. This will force a lot of people onto an already overcrowded and badly run public transport system just to get to work. Anyone travelling after 9-30 (ie shoppers, daytrippers, footballers wives and Wayne Rooney's bride to be)will not be affected. Bottom line, it will only hit the workers. Great.
I don't drive to work anymore, but I do use public transport. Just to get to Manchester from Bolton and home involves getting
into a survival fight (half the time with holiday travellers and thirty ton of suitcases going to the airport) and very rarely getting a seat. I do however think it most unfair on drivers going to and from work having to pay for the cost of all this. Just another example of government fairness.
Rant over.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43343
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
It's all specualation right now Bruce and they claim they won't initiate it until sufficient public transport services are in place. Way I understand it the M60 is the outer ring and the inner area is the city centre. If you live inside the M60 they'll probably nab you going to work but they claim it's peak hours only. Then again, the goalposts may move.Bruce Rioja wrote:Does anyone know how this might affect me, in so far as I live inside the M60 but work outside it?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1163
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Up, around the bend...
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43343
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Morning TD.TANGODANCER wrote:Morning Lennon. Take it you don't work in the Manchester area then?Lennon wrote:Any suggestions of better ways to decrease congestion, or is this just an instinctive rant?
No, I don't. I have to drive through Preston to get to work though, and the traffic is absolutely horrendous every day, without fail. I'd welcome anything which might reduce the congestion. If it failed miserably, that'd be another story, but as long as the local government was atleast trying, they'd get my full support.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:18 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Contact:
I can't see this reducing congestion at all - I don't believe it has been too successful in London, so why here?
As Tango said:
As Tango said:
And yes, they'll claim that the increased revenue would be used to support and fund improvements to the rail network. Hindssign would suggest that they continued to extend the Metrolink........This will force a lot of people onto an already overcrowded and badly run public transport system just to get to work.
Smarties have answers.....
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1163
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Up, around the bend...
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43343
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Whilst I don't drive now, I did for a fair few years into Manchester and twenty years of driving into Liverpool prior to that. (When I first started that the East Lancs was three lane with a "suicide" overtaking lane) It got progressively worse and has always been that way. All this will do is deter people for a while and then they'll go back to driving. When that happens the GMT will just bang up the costs and rake in even more money for the simple reason the town centre and its access roads are full. They cannot expand any more. You cannot put two pounds of sugar into a one-pound bag. The only answer is for firms to relocate to other areas and eventually that will cause havoc.Lennon wrote:Morning TD.TANGODANCER wrote:Morning Lennon. Take it you don't work in the Manchester area then?Lennon wrote:Any suggestions of better ways to decrease congestion, or is this just an instinctive rant?
No, I don't. I have to drive through Preston to get to work though, and the traffic is absolutely horrendous every day, without fail. I'd welcome anything which might reduce the congestion. If it failed miserably, that'd be another story, but as long as the local government was atleast trying, they'd get my full support.
The only real solution is a better organised system of public transport. That at least might work...for a time.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Promising
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 10:30 am
- Location: Underneath the squeaky floorboard, behind the kitchen dresser
Re: Rant.
[quote="TANGODANCER"]No new debate, but from this mornings Metro:
Greater Manchester is considering a bid to the government for a three billion pound project for traffic control etc. Basically they are looking at massive congestion charges reaching to Bolton, Wigan, Rochdale, Stockport, Leigh, Altrincham etc etc. This will force a lot of people onto an already overcrowded and badly run public transport system just to get to work. Anyone travelling after 9-30 (ie shoppers, daytrippers, footballers wives and Wayne Rooney's bride to be)will not be affected. Bottom line, it will only hit the workers. Great.
I don't drive to work anymore, but I do use public transport. Just to get to Manchester from Bolton and home involves getting
into a survival fight (half the time with holiday travellers and thirty ton of suitcases going to the airport) and very rarely getting a seat. I do however think it most unfair on drivers going to and from work having to pay for the cost of all this. Just another example of government fairness.
Rant over
Only way it can work is the re-nationalisation of the railways. They should never have been privatised
it in the first place and its gone to pot ever since. Second Highest rail fares in Europe for an already crap service. Rail prices will go up, fact. Its not in the rail companies interest not to. 16% increases in train travel over the last couple of years. Has the price gone down. Hell no up by over 12%.
Greater Manchester is considering a bid to the government for a three billion pound project for traffic control etc. Basically they are looking at massive congestion charges reaching to Bolton, Wigan, Rochdale, Stockport, Leigh, Altrincham etc etc. This will force a lot of people onto an already overcrowded and badly run public transport system just to get to work. Anyone travelling after 9-30 (ie shoppers, daytrippers, footballers wives and Wayne Rooney's bride to be)will not be affected. Bottom line, it will only hit the workers. Great.
I don't drive to work anymore, but I do use public transport. Just to get to Manchester from Bolton and home involves getting
into a survival fight (half the time with holiday travellers and thirty ton of suitcases going to the airport) and very rarely getting a seat. I do however think it most unfair on drivers going to and from work having to pay for the cost of all this. Just another example of government fairness.
Rant over
Only way it can work is the re-nationalisation of the railways. They should never have been privatised
it in the first place and its gone to pot ever since. Second Highest rail fares in Europe for an already crap service. Rail prices will go up, fact. Its not in the rail companies interest not to. 16% increases in train travel over the last couple of years. Has the price gone down. Hell no up by over 12%.
If I should die, think only this of me:
That there's some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England
That there's some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
Re: Rant.
Comparing rail prices and levels of service against the rest of Europe is pointless if you ignore government intervention and subsidies. The Road Lobby in the UK has been dominant for over forty years, thereby condemning the railways to inadequate infrastructure, aging and scarce rolling stock, and a total lack of worthwhile investment. This is not a party political issue either. The Road Lobby has held sway through Conservative and Labour administrations alike.wovlad wrote: Only way it can work is the re-nationalisation of the railways. They should never have been privatised
it in the first place and its gone to pot ever since. Second Highest rail fares in Europe for an already crap service. Rail prices will go up, fact. Its not in the rail companies interest not to. 16% increases in train travel over the last couple of years. Has the price gone down. Hell no up by over 12%.
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
Another option is to encourage lift-sharing. The vast majority of cars you see during rush hour contain lone drivers.
It's not the governments fault we choose to drive to work alone in cars that can seat up to 5 people.
Aswell as reducing congestion (and therefore pollution), it also cuts individual fuel costs, so everyone's a winner.
There are some actions we can take ourselves rather than moaning at the government to do it for us.
It's not the governments fault we choose to drive to work alone in cars that can seat up to 5 people.
Aswell as reducing congestion (and therefore pollution), it also cuts individual fuel costs, so everyone's a winner.
There are some actions we can take ourselves rather than moaning at the government to do it for us.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43343
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Tried that one time. Got totally pissed off at waiting for people who couldn't get out of bed or didn't turn up making me (who'd got up in time) late for work. Even had to knock some of them up as we needed them on the job. Not a total solution IMO.Lennon wrote:Another option is to encourage lift-sharing. The vast majority of cars you see during rush hour contain lone drivers.
It's not the governments fault we choose to drive to work alone in cars that can seat up to 5 people.
Aswell as reducing congestion (and therefore pollution), it also cuts individual fuel costs, so everyone's a winner.
There are some actions we can take ourselves rather than moaning at the government to do it for us.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
In many parts of North America, during rush hour, the fast lane on the highway is reserved for buses, taxis and cars with passengers. That is how we encourage lift sharing, and it seems to work. Of course, people cheat but they do get caught in police traps. One enterprising chap had an inflatable dummy in his passenger seat but they got him in the end.Lennon wrote:Another option is to encourage lift-sharing. The vast majority of cars you see during rush hour contain lone drivers.
It's not the governments fault we choose to drive to work alone in cars that can seat up to 5 people.
Aswell as reducing congestion (and therefore pollution), it also cuts individual fuel costs, so everyone's a winner.
There are some actions we can take ourselves rather than moaning at the government to do it for us.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Well obviously, I'm not saying it would resolve the problem. It's another option though.TANGODANCER wrote:Tried that one time. Got totally pissed off at waiting for people who couldn't get out of bed or didn't turn up making me (who'd got up in time) late for work. Even had to knock some of them up as we needed them on the job. Not a total solution IMO.
I've lift-shared on many occassions with various people, and never had a problem. In fact, it saved me money, encouraged me to be far more punctual, and also meant both me and my lift-share had a back-up plan incase of mechanical problems, so there's the balance.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests