Super Pratt!
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Super Pratt!
Why did they just not shoot him, chuck him in a car in the middle of the dessert and claim bandits must have done it, round up and execute a few peasents job done, no more dodgy jock mp!!!
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
No I never mentioned anything to do with strapping him naked ontop of an ant hill with nowt but a pic of Harriet Harman to look at all day, at least till the ants ate his eyeballs!superjohnmcginlay wrote:Did you forget to take your medication this morning?
Forgot to add the bit about Blair/browns speech's about Sadams WMD being played over and over again to him!
And next motion for debate at the Oxford Union is...Hobinho wrote:No I never mentioned anything to do with strapping him naked ontop of an ant hill with nowt but a pic of Harriet Harman to look at all day, at least till the ants ate his eyeballs!superjohnmcginlay wrote:Did you forget to take your medication this morning?
Forgot to add the bit about Blair/browns speech's about Sadams WMD being played over and over again to him!
![Crazy :crazy:](./images/smilies/crazy.gif)
Debate with HIM!!!!!! He should have been shot for treason!!! I wanna know why he still wants to be an MP in England, surely his misguided experience and treachery would be more suited to the Scottish parliment?ratbert wrote:And next motion for debate at the Oxford Union is...Hobinho wrote:No I never mentioned anything to do with strapping him naked ontop of an ant hill with nowt but a pic of Harriet Harman to look at all day, at least till the ants ate his eyeballs!superjohnmcginlay wrote:Did you forget to take your medication this morning?
Forgot to add the bit about Blair/browns speech's about Sadams WMD being played over and over again to him!
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Ah, that explains my total confusion....Hobinho wrote:Bit like me I forgot to post the linksuperjohnmcginlay wrote:Right I think he's on about Galloway who's just been fooked off from Egypt for being a stupid c*nt (probably).
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- mofgimmers
- Reliable
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:54 am
- Location: Manchester
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
A constituency that elects a Respect candidate is likely to be pretty supportive of Galloway's position on this. The high percentage of muslim voters and his pro-Palestine, anti-war position helped him win the last election, and they would probably be on his side with this. And MPs don't have to concentrate on exclusively constituency matters anyway.superjohnmcginlay wrote:S'pose its better than pretending to be a cat. One question though, how is he serving his constituency all the way out there?
And yes, I agree, he won't be terribly upset about the personal publicity either.
But that doesn't alter the fact that he's right on this.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 99 guests