The Politics Thread

[William the White]

Suggests at least one option is right then and you don't quite agree with the other.

Doesn't suggest anything of the kind.

[thebish]

so - it seems Abu Qatada is not guilty.

(Hobes - apologies may be posted here! )

He's still a foreigner with a beard. Go on, get out of that one if you can.

you've got me there!

[Worthy4England]

so - it seems Abu Qatada is not guilty.

(Hobes - apologies may be posted here! )

Very short sighted. Everyone is guilty of something. We just haven't found out what it is yet.

[William the White]

so - it seems Abu Qatada is not guilty.

(Hobes - apologies may be posted here! )

Very short sighted. Everyone is guilty of something. We just haven't found out what it is yet.

I had a Catholic friend that was so good when he went to weekly confession he had to lie about his sins.

So I suppose he was guilty of lying...

[Hoboh]

so - it seems Abu Qatada is not guilty.

(Hobes - apologies may be posted here! )

Britain's Home Office said he was "not coming back to the UK" as its courts agreed he was a threat to security.

Not guilty in Jordan despite all the whinging liberals and their cohorts stating he wouldn't get a fair trial, kinda wrong there were they not?

AQ can spout all he likes about the West now we are not paying to support him and his tribe, one day he nay cross a border and get spotted by a drone, ours or Yank, not to bothered.

[Worthy4England]

so - it seems Abu Qatada is not guilty.

(Hobes - apologies may be posted here! )

Very short sighted. Everyone is guilty of something. We just haven't found out what it is yet.

I had a Catholic friend that was so good when he went to weekly confession he had to lie about his sins.

So I suppose he was guilty of lying...

See! Fortunately I always had a long list...

[William the White]

so - it seems Abu Qatada is not guilty.

(Hobes - apologies may be posted here! )

Very short sighted. Everyone is guilty of something. We just haven't found out what it is yet.

I had a Catholic friend that was so good when he went to weekly confession he had to lie about his sins.

So I suppose he was guilty of lying...

See! Fortunately I always had a long list...

And a bloody lengthy argument about everyone of them... I bet the priest dreaded you turning up...

[thebish]

Not guilty in Jordan despite all the whinging liberals and their cohorts stating he wouldn't get a fair trial, kinda wrong there were they not?

so - if (as you acknowledge) the trial was fair and he was found not guilty, why would you want him taken out by a drone? what exactly is this man guilty of to the extend that he should be assassinated?

[Hoboh]

so - it seems Abu Qatada is not guilty.

(Hobes - apologies may be posted here! )

Very short sighted. Everyone is guilty of something. We just haven't found out what it is yet.

I had a Catholic friend that was so good when he went to weekly confession he had to lie about his sins.

So I suppose he was guilty of lying...

See! Fortunately I always had a long list...

And a bloody lengthy argument about everyone of them... I bet the priest dreaded you turning up...

He just cancelled all appointments for the rest of the day

[Hoboh]

Not guilty in Jordan despite all the whinging liberals and their cohorts stating he wouldn't get a fair trial, kinda wrong there were they not?

so - if (as you acknowledge) the trial was fair and he was found not guilty, why would you want him taken out by a drone? what exactly is this man guilty of to the extend that he should be assassinated?

He was on trial in Jordan for offences committed there not for inciting knob jobs to kill the non believers over here!

[thebish]

Not guilty in Jordan despite all the whinging liberals and their cohorts stating he wouldn't get a fair trial, kinda wrong there were they not?

so - if (as you acknowledge) the trial was fair and he was found not guilty, why would you want him taken out by a drone? what exactly is this man guilty of to the extend that he should be assassinated?

He was on trial in Jordan for offences committed there not for inciting knob jobs to kill the non believers over here!

if we thought he was guilty of that - we could have put him on trial for it - (we still could) - he was here for long enough doing nothing... yet - we chose not to... probably because we didn't think we could make it stand up in court...

(and - from where I sit, you are the one on a forum inciting nutjobs to kill an innocent man....)

[a1]

Specialists:
Robert May, Oxford University and Imperial College London
Mike Hulme, Director, Tyndall Centre, UEA
Blake Lee-Harwood, Head of Campaigns, Greenpeace
Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen
Michael Bravo, Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge
Andrew Dlugolecki, Insurance industry consultant
Trevor Evans, US Embassy
Colin Challen MP, Chair, All Party Group on Climate Change
Anuradha Vittachi, Director, Oneworld.net
Andrew Simms, Policy Director, New Economics Foundation
Claire Foster, Church of England
Saleemul Huq, IIED
Poshendra Satyal Pravat, Open University
Li Moxuan, Climate campaigner, Greenpeace China
Tadesse Dadi, Tearfund Ethiopia
Iain Wright, CO2 Project Manager, BP International
Ashok Sinha, Stop Climate Chaos
Andy Atkins, Advocacy Director, Tearfund
Matthew Farrow, CBI
Rafael Hidalgo, TV/multimedia producer
Cheryl Campbell, Executive Director, Television for the Environment
Kevin McCullough, Director, Npower Renewables
Richard D North, Institute of Economic Affairs
Steve Widdicombe, Plymouth Marine Labs
Joe Smith, The Open University
Mark Galloway, Director, IBT
Anita Neville, E3G
Eleni Andreadis, Harvard University
Jos Wheatley, Global Environment Assets Team, DFID
Tessa Tennant, Chair, AsRia

BBC attendees:
Jana Bennett, Director of Television
Sacha Baveystock, Executive Producer, Science
Helen Boaden, Director of News
Andrew Lane, Manager, Weather, TV News
Anne Gilchrist, Executive Editor Indies & Events, CBBC
Dominic Vallely, Executive Editor, Entertainment
Eleanor Moran, Development Executive, Drama Commissioning
Elizabeth McKay, Project Executive, Education
Emma Swain, Commissioning Editor, Specialist Factual
Fergal Keane, (Chair), Foreign Affairs Correspondent
Fran Unsworth, Head of Newsgathering
George Entwistle, Head of TV Current Affairs
Glenwyn Benson, Controller, Factual TV
John Lynch, Creative Director, Specialist Factual
Jon Plowman, Head of Comedy
Jon Williams, TV Editor Newsgathering
Karen O’Connor, Editor, This World, Current Affairs
Catriona McKenzie, Tightrope Pictures

BBC Television Centre, London (cont)
Liz Molyneux, Editorial Executive, Factual Commissioning
Matt Morris, Head of News, Radio Five Live
Neil Nightingale, Head of Natural History Unit
Paul Brannan, Deputy Head of News Interactive
Peter Horrocks, Head of Television News
Peter Rippon, Duty Editor, World at One/PM/The World this Weekend
Phil Harding, Director, English Networks & Nations
Steve Mitchell, Head Of Radio News
Sue Inglish, Head Of Political Programmes
Frances Weil, Editor of News Special Events

how many science papers have these published ?

[Worthy4England]

so - it seems Abu Qatada is not guilty.

(Hobes - apologies may be posted here! )

Very short sighted. Everyone is guilty of something. We just haven't found out what it is yet.

I had a Catholic friend that was so good when he went to weekly confession he had to lie about his sins.

So I suppose he was guilty of lying...

See! Fortunately I always had a long list...

And a bloody lengthy argument about everyone of them... I bet the priest dreaded you turning up...

I just used to 'fess up. No point arguing on something you're admitting.

[William the White]

Very short sighted. Everyone is guilty of something. We just haven't found out what it is yet.

I had a Catholic friend that was so good when he went to weekly confession he had to lie about his sins.

So I suppose he was guilty of lying...

See! Fortunately I always had a long list...

And a bloody lengthy argument about everyone of them... I bet the priest dreaded you turning up...

I just used to 'fess up. No point arguing on something you're admitting.

You didn't argue bout the penance??? Like you were bored with our fathers and shouldn't he have a bit more imagination or how harsh it was? Or beyond the normal tariff for a mere dip into veniality?

[TANGODANCER]

You didn't argue bout the penance??? Like you were bored with our fathers and shouldn't he have a bit more imagination or how harsh it was? Or beyond the normal tariff for a mere dip into veniality?

Every good Catholic knows it was Hail Marys' and decades of the rosary for anything extreme...

p.s: A decade of the rosary had the equivalent bragging rights of an ASBO...

[thebish]

i've always thought that making someone pray as a punishment was a bizarre idea...

[Worthy4England]

[quote="William the White]You didn't argue bout the penance??? Like you were bored with our fathers and shouldn't he have a bit more imagination or how harsh it was? Or beyond the normal tariff for a mere dip into veniality?[/quote]

Didn't see the point, when you could talk directly to the appeal judge.

No point arguing with the organ grinder (how apt).

[thebish]

You didn't argue bout the penance???

there's summat spectacularly wrong-sounding when WtW attempts some kind of street-talk style!

[William the White]

[quote="William the White]You didn't argue bout the penance??? Like you were bored with our fathers and shouldn't he have a bit more imagination or how harsh it was? Or beyond the normal tariff for a mere dip into veniality?

Didn't see the point, when you could talk directly to the appeal judge.

No point arguing with the organ grinder (how apt).[/quote][/quote]

[Hoboh]

Not guilty in Jordan despite all the whinging liberals and their cohorts stating he wouldn't get a fair trial, kinda wrong there were they not?

so - if (as you acknowledge) the trial was fair and he was found not guilty, why would you want him taken out by a drone? what exactly is this man guilty of to the extend that he should be assassinated?

He was on trial in Jordan for offences committed there not for inciting knob jobs to kill the non believers over here!

if we thought he was guilty of that - we could have put him on trial for it - (we still could) - he was here for long enough doing nothing... yet - we chose not to... probably because we didn't think we could make it stand up in court...

(and - from where I sit, you are the one on a forum inciting nutjobs to kill an innocent man....)

I suspect one of the reasons we never put him on trial was the same reason why our local rag never publish the ethnicity of people involved in car crashes except if they are white Anglo saxons.