creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Dujon
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3340
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:37 am
Location: Australia, near Sydney, NSW
Contact:

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Dujon » Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:59 am

I don't know what's being said in England. From what I've read here in the print medium (or heard on the radio for that matter) no one is complaining about the rain. Of course it's mentioned, as a fact, but there is no beating of chests or tearing of hair. Joe Public - and that includes me - knows perfectly well that without that amazing effort by Agar in the first test Australia would have been well and truly thumped in the first two tests. Most comments here are made quizzing the technology used in the referral system which seems to have baffled players of both teams as well as respected cricket commentators and analysts. Add to that the remainder, which are overwhelmingly about the team not working properly, and you have collection in which terms such as 'We Wuz Robbed!" are hard to find.

The Australian press can be terribly parochial at times so I'm not quite sure why I'm defending them this time other than I'm surprised to see they seem to have collectively (and probably temporarily) changed their spots. :smile:

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:29 am

Dujon wrote: they seem to have collectively (and probably temporarily) changed their spots. :smile:
A leopard can't. I know this. You can mislay one or two though.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:43 pm

England 51-1. Root fell to the hotspot umpire.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:50 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:England 51-1. Root fell to the hotspot umpire.
What's your take on it, Tango? Did they get this one correct?
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38838
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:54 pm

It was out. Clearly. Correct decision.

Still like the TMS team very unconvinced by Root as an opener. One big innings this series (where he was dropped on 8) but the rest have been failures, averaging 11.

Looks a good sort and seems resilient, but I'm not convinced he's the answer to open in Australia.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:06 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:England 51-1. Root fell to the hotspot umpire.
What's your take on it, Tango? Did they get this one correct?
I' m following Sky match commentary on my pc Bruce. Just shows a still shot, but if that's an edge it's a fine one.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by jimbo » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:07 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:It was out. Clearly. Correct decision.

Still like the TMS team very unconvinced by Root as an opener. One big innings this series (where he was dropped on 8) but the rest have been failures, averaging 11.

Looks a good sort and seems resilient, but I'm not convinced he's the answer to open in Australia.
Agreed. Not sure who we would promote to open instead though. At least if Root dropped down the order we could get shut of Bairstow. Such an unconvincing top order at the moment

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by jimbo » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:08 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:England 51-1. Root fell to the hotspot umpire.
What's your take on it, Tango? Did they get this one correct?
I' m following Sky match commentary on my pc Bruce. Just shows a still shot, but if that's an edge it's a fine one.
It was just a genuine nick, big noise and caught behind. Bat nowhere near anything else. Poor decision by the on field umpire in the first place. The standard of the officials this series has been appalling!

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:13 pm

Cheers guys. Any further updates for those of us that are currently lunching al desko - most appreciated.
May the bridges I burn light your way

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by jimbo » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:18 pm

It's been pretty turgid so far. I'm off to the cinema instead

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:54 pm

Play's restarted again and we've upped the ante a little. 70-1.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:36 pm

111-2 as Trott goes on 49.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:37 pm

Hmmm. Is the ball doing much, Tango?
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38838
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:39 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Hmmm. Is the ball doing much, Tango?
Absolutely nowt.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:59 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Hmmm. Is the ball doing much, Tango?
Might be the ball or bad judgement, but there seem to be a few thick edges around and Siddle's always dangerous. Pietersen's being more than a bit cavalier right now but we've gone to 128-2.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Aug 09, 2013 3:10 pm

Commentator reckons there's life in the pitch for the seamers. Seems to be borne out as Cook got lucky there with an inside edge just missing the stumps. 144-2.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38838
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Aug 09, 2013 3:15 pm

Wicket is very slow so getting runs isn't easy.

But very little movement off the pitch and not much if any swing.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Aug 09, 2013 3:25 pm

Pietersen gone for 26 to a ball that he expected to turn...and didn't. 149-3.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38838
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Aug 09, 2013 3:26 pm

Again our batting is not impressing.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Aug 09, 2013 3:29 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Again our batting is not impressing.
Last time it impressed you Len Hutton was batting. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests