Christening
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
Ooooh, get her!!Puskas wrote:Tango - in your occasional, dull and repetitive posts on subjects like this, you always confuse rationality with simply replacing one form of superstition for another. It isn't. It's about evidence and questioning. I know you're not very good with those concepts, but do try to deal with them, rather than making your tedious remarks like the above one, eh?TANGODANCER wrote:Have a "Thanks to Charles Darwin" ceremony, or maybe a quick prayer to Science for your child to have a long and happy life. That should do it.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Yes! I think the general tone of your comments suggest you know it's a pointless pantomime really...
Or don't comment on them at all - it's not as if it's adding anything useful.

God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Oh, begging your pardon sir. Naughty steps it is. Do you realize how absolutely pompous it is telling somebdy not to comment or contradict your own superior views on life? At least mine was in jest, or is there no humour in your closed world? It's about as intrusive as an atheist advising someone on whether or not to have a Christening, the subject of this thread I believe. You might note my comment about believing what you like. Unlike you I don't care what anyone believes, they have the right to do it.Puskas wrote:Tango - in your occasional, dull and repetitive posts on subjects like this, you always confuse rationality with simply replacing one form of superstition for another. It isn't. It's about evidence and questioning. I know you're not very good with those concepts, but do try to deal with them, rather than making your tedious remarks like the above one, eh?TANGODANCER wrote:Have a "Thanks to Charles Darwin" ceremony, or maybe a quick prayer to Science for your child to have a long and happy life. That should do it.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Yes! I think the general tone of your comments suggest you know it's a pointless pantomime really...
Or don't comment on them at all - it's not as if it's adding anything useful.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Sorry, I should be clear that I only think it is a 'pantomime' or 'charade' for those with no religious convictions (not guilty, your honour!).TANGODANCER wrote:Have a "Thanks to Charles Darwin" ceremony, or maybe a quick prayer to Science for your child to have a long and happy life. That should do it.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Yes! I think the general tone of your comments suggest you know it's a pointless pantomime really...
I can see that they are worthwhile and meaningful for people of faith.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
Well, come one. He always does it - talks about rationalists "praying" to Dawkins, Darwin or "science", when that's completely the opposite of what happens. Question and obtain evidence, don't worship - that's the point.Zulus Thousand of em wrote:Ooooh, get her!!Puskas wrote:Tango - in your occasional, dull and repetitive posts on subjects like this, you always confuse rationality with simply replacing one form of superstition for another. It isn't. It's about evidence and questioning. I know you're not very good with those concepts, but do try to deal with them, rather than making your tedious remarks like the above one, eh?TANGODANCER wrote:Have a "Thanks to Charles Darwin" ceremony, or maybe a quick prayer to Science for your child to have a long and happy life. That should do it.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Yes! I think the general tone of your comments suggest you know it's a pointless pantomime really...
Or don't comment on them at all - it's not as if it's adding anything useful.
His comments are neither funny nor useful, and do nothing more than expose his own ignorance. Some folk may choose to laugh at that, but I'd rather he were educated.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
As I may have mentioned, you didn't contradict or comment on my way of life - you made a ridiculous comment, like you always do in this situation. It wasn't funny and it had nothing to do with anything.TANGODANCER wrote:Oh, begging your pardon sir. Naughty steps it is. Do you realize how absolutely pompous it is telling somebdy not to comment or contradict your own superior views on life? At least mine was in jest, or is there no humour in your closed world? It's about as intrusive as an atheist advising someone on whether or not to have a Christening, the subject of this thread I believe. You might note my comment about believing what you like. Unlike you I don't care what anyone believes, they have the right to do it.Puskas wrote:Tango - in your occasional, dull and repetitive posts on subjects like this, you always confuse rationality with simply replacing one form of superstition for another. It isn't. It's about evidence and questioning. I know you're not very good with those concepts, but do try to deal with them, rather than making your tedious remarks like the above one, eh?TANGODANCER wrote:Have a "Thanks to Charles Darwin" ceremony, or maybe a quick prayer to Science for your child to have a long and happy life. That should do it.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Yes! I think the general tone of your comments suggest you know it's a pointless pantomime really...
Or don't comment on them at all - it's not as if it's adding anything useful.
You're now trying to get on your usual high-horse. Quelle suprise.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
No sorries necesary Mummy. We're all allowed views....I think.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Sorry, I should be clear that I only think it is a 'pantomime' or 'charade' for those with no religious convictions (not guilty, your honour!). I can see that they are worthwhile and meaningful for people of faith.TANGODANCER wrote:Have a "Thanks to Charles Darwin" ceremony, or maybe a quick prayer to Science for your child to have a long and happy life. That should do it.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Yes! I think the general tone of your comments suggest you know it's a pointless pantomime really...

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Ironic? Fxxking hell.Puskas wrote:As I may have mentioned, you didn't contradict or comment on my way of life - you made a ridiculous comment, like you always do in this situation. It wasn't funny and it had nothing to do with anything.TANGODANCER wrote:Oh, begging your pardon sir. Naughty steps it is. Do you realize how absolutely pompous it is telling somebdy not to comment or contradict your own superior views on life? At least mine was in jest, or is there no humour in your closed world? It's about as intrusive as an atheist advising someone on whether or not to have a Christening, the subject of this thread I believe. You might note my comment about believing what you like. Unlike you I don't care what anyone believes, they have the right to do it.Puskas wrote:Tango - in your occasional, dull and repetitive posts on subjects like this, you always confuse rationality with simply replacing one form of superstition for another. It isn't. It's about evidence and questioning. I know you're not very good with those concepts, but do try to deal with them, rather than making your tedious remarks like the above one, eh?TANGODANCER wrote:Have a "Thanks to Charles Darwin" ceremony, or maybe a quick prayer to Science for your child to have a long and happy life. That should do it.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Yes! I think the general tone of your comments suggest you know it's a pointless pantomime really...
Or don't comment on them at all - it's not as if it's adding anything useful.
You're now trying to get on your usual high-horse. Quelle suprise.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
Not really, no.TANGODANCER wrote:Ironic? Fxxking hell.Puskas wrote:As I may have mentioned, you didn't contradict or comment on my way of life - you made a ridiculous comment, like you always do in this situation. It wasn't funny and it had nothing to do with anything.TANGODANCER wrote:Oh, begging your pardon sir. Naughty steps it is. Do you realize how absolutely pompous it is telling somebdy not to comment or contradict your own superior views on life? At least mine was in jest, or is there no humour in your closed world? It's about as intrusive as an atheist advising someone on whether or not to have a Christening, the subject of this thread I believe. You might note my comment about believing what you like. Unlike you I don't care what anyone believes, they have the right to do it.Puskas wrote:Tango - in your occasional, dull and repetitive posts on subjects like this, you always confuse rationality with simply replacing one form of superstition for another. It isn't. It's about evidence and questioning. I know you're not very good with those concepts, but do try to deal with them, rather than making your tedious remarks like the above one, eh?TANGODANCER wrote: Have a "Thanks to Charles Darwin" ceremony, or maybe a quick prayer to Science for your child to have a long and happy life. That should do it.
Or don't comment on them at all - it's not as if it's adding anything useful.
You're now trying to get on your usual high-horse. Quelle suprise.
Never mind, son.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
Cucumber like.Zulus Thousand of em wrote:I think your horse is fairly stratospheric at the moment. Politics and religion - not worth the hassle.Puskas wrote: You're now trying to get on your usual high-horse. Quelle suprise.
Chill.
But less green. And long.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
So anyway, my sister decided that it would be nice to have her youngest done at the local methodist gaff in their nice little village, you know, thought it was good for the little 'un to have some roots in a quaint little place, part of the community. Caused a few grumbles as her in-laws are RC, but they were happier than nowt.She even started taking my nieces reasonably regularly. She's well aware of my views on the brainwashing of religion, but laughed it off.
She phoned me a couple of months ago to say she'd stopped going when the priest/vicar/cannon/voodoo witch doctor started a sermon entitled "Its adam and eve not adam and steve". I took the opportunity to say I told you so.
Up to you General, for me its not worth the bother, have a friends/family get together as a celebration or somert. Thats generally the important part of the day anyway.
She phoned me a couple of months ago to say she'd stopped going when the priest/vicar/cannon/voodoo witch doctor started a sermon entitled "Its adam and eve not adam and steve". I took the opportunity to say I told you so.
Up to you General, for me its not worth the bother, have a friends/family get together as a celebration or somert. Thats generally the important part of the day anyway.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
I thought we did this ages ago. Babel fish argument. Religious types say evolution can't be true coz the eye or something is too perfect. Thus they prove god exists, and therefore doesn't, as, according to their own book Mr. God rejects proof, for proof denies faith, and without faith he is nothing. Poof of smoke, folk have to watch out for zebra crossings.Worthy4England wrote:So has anyone proved there isn't a God yet?
Easy.
Anyway General, my advice would be balls to the question of belief. If you don't believe in it it doesn't matter. I like to look at the sky and say 'if it rains tomorrow, I'll kill a baby' and then see what happens. That'll be fun to explain on judgement day. If you want the party and the prezzies and the show the godparents you value them thing, then go for it. The presents are useless, but I've still got all mine, and they're nice. Equally I'd assume being asked to be one would be nice. But then if you don't think folk would be that bothered versus the cost and actually having to go, just have a party at yours or something. Don't need any speeches or owt, just booze. Sorted.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
What judgement day is that then? Start a thread on it....but no, better not. I'd get banned again.Prufrock wrote:I thought we did this ages ago. Babel fish argument. Religious types say evolution can't be true coz the eye or something is too perfect. Thus they prove god exists, and therefore doesn't, as, according to their own book Mr. God rejects proof, for proof denies faith, and without faith he is nothing. Poof of smoke, folk have to watch out for zebra crossings.Worthy4England wrote:So has anyone proved there isn't a God yet?
Easy.
Anyway General, my advice would be balls to the question of belief. If you don't believe in it it doesn't matter. I like to look at the sky and say 'if it rains tomorrow, I'll kill a baby' and then see what happens. That'll be fun to explain on judgement day. If you want the party and the prezzies and the show the godparents you value them thing, then go for it. The presents are useless, but I've still got all mine, and they're nice. Equally I'd assume being asked to be one would be nice. But then if you don't think folk would be that bothered versus the cost and actually having to go, just have a party at yours or something. Don't need any speeches or owt, just booze. Sorted.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
I've got to say this. You god botherers and your opponents the atheists et al are like a shoal of bloody goldfish! Why do we have to go through all this "There is a God", "No, there isn't!", "Yes, there is!" bollocks every two or three weeks? Don't you remember you had the argument on here already and nobody won? 
And yes, I do have to read it. As a mod it's the only way I know to keep you from one anothers' throats.
Poor sad bastard that I am!
Did I mention that my dog shat in front of the telly?

And yes, I do have to read it. As a mod it's the only way I know to keep you from one anothers' throats.
Poor sad bastard that I am!
Did I mention that my dog shat in front of the telly?
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests