The Politics Thread

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Who will you be voting for?

Labour
13
41%
Conservatives
12
38%
Liberal Democrats
2
6%
UK Independence Party (UKIP)
0
No votes
Green Party
3
9%
Plaid Cymru
0
No votes
Other
1
3%
Planet Hobo
1
3%
 
Total votes: 32

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:27 am

Beefheart wrote:
thebish wrote:I had hoped we were past this kind of stuff - but it seems not...

Owen Smith has branded himself the “normal” candidate for the party leadership because he has a “wife and three kids”. (no coincidence that his pre-contest rival is lesbian then...) :?
I think he was *trying* to use 'normal' to mean 'down to earth' because he's got three kids (so what? :conf: ) the way Eagle has been using 'northern' to mean 'down to earth' (so what? :conf: ), but yes it did come across very badly.

Eagles' "Look, I'm northern, me, so vote for me..." IS cringingly embarassing...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38827
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:42 am

Aye. Lets just stick with the guy who has zero interest in winning a GE.

Beefheart
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2918
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:36 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Beefheart » Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:57 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye. Lets just stick with the guy who has zero interest in winning a GE.
Not sure anyone is suggesting that.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:01 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye. Lets just stick with the guy who has zero interest in winning a GE.

apart from the fact that nobody said that.... it's never a good idea to allow your virulent opposition to ONE person totally blind you to the obvious faults of the alternatives.

there's a frying pan here - and oooh look - a fire over there! JUMP! :D

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38827
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:11 am

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye. Lets just stick with the guy who has zero interest in winning a GE.

apart from the fact that nobody said that.... it's never a good idea to allow your virulent opposition to ONE person totally blind you to the obvious faults of the alternatives.

there's a frying pan here - and oooh look - a fire over there! JUMP! :D
Well I don't think either are electable but someone needs to do a huge repair job. Corbyn is hell bent on destroying the Labour party as we know it, so one of the other two will have to try and start the repairs. It literally is a case of anyone but Corbyn now IF people want the Labour party to still exist and still form an opposition.

Beefheart
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2918
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:36 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Beefheart » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:18 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye. Lets just stick with the guy who has zero interest in winning a GE.

apart from the fact that nobody said that.... it's never a good idea to allow your virulent opposition to ONE person totally blind you to the obvious faults of the alternatives.

there's a frying pan here - and oooh look - a fire over there! JUMP! :D
Well I don't think either are electable but someone needs to do a huge repair job. Corbyn is hell bent on destroying the Labour party as we know it, so one of the other two will have to try and start the repairs. It literally is a case of anyone but Corbyn now IF people want the Labour party to still exist and still form an opposition.
It'd certainly be near impossible to be as bad as Corbyn. Read a couple of accounts from former shadow ministers about how he would constantly undermine them through action, inaction or bad timing. When you spend all your time on the backbenches I guess you don't get much practice at it. The others would at least get those fundamental things sorted out. They'd also be more willing to step aside if they aren't polling well ahead of the next general election.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13657
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:04 am

Worthy4England wrote:It certainly seems to have been fairly amateurish...what's your theory?
Well the coup hit a hotel half a mile away from where the President was staying.

The Turkish government forces seemed well prepared in the midst of chaos to respond to events, example just how the hell did they know so quickly just who's side what aircraft was on?

Why according to the government did they launch 11 bombs from F-16'S on a nearly empty Parliament building?

How come no major government officials got targeted?

Why did the soldiers allow civilians to 'get in their face'?
In nearly all armed military coups I've ever read about confronting the troops is usually suicide.

Strange how less than 24hrs after the event the government has a list of 'coup' supporters and is actively rounding them up, why no action before if they knew about this 'coup'?

It could be an amateur attempt but they have past experience in this type of action.

Just a thought, maybe, someone who said they would neither forgive or forget prompted a little mischief even?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38827
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:07 am

Hoboh wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:It certainly seems to have been fairly amateurish...what's your theory?
Well the coup hit a hotel half a mile away from where the President was staying.

The Turkish government forces seemed well prepared in the midst of chaos to respond to events, example just how the hell did they know so quickly just who's side what aircraft was on?

Why according to the government did they launch 11 bombs from F-16'S on a nearly empty Parliament building?

How come no major government officials got targeted?

Why did the soldiers allow civilians to 'get in their face'?
In nearly all armed military coups I've ever read about confronting the troops is usually suicide.

Strange how less than 24hrs after the event the government has a list of 'coup' supporters and is actively rounding them up, why no action before if they knew about this 'coup'?

It could be an amateur attempt but they have past experience in this type of action.

Just a thought, maybe, someone who said they would neither forgive or forget prompted a little mischief even?
I have to say some of the aftermath has felt a little "staged" to put it mildly.

It could just have been a very bad attempt though....

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13657
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:09 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye. Lets just stick with the guy who has zero interest in winning a GE.

apart from the fact that nobody said that.... it's never a good idea to allow your virulent opposition to ONE person totally blind you to the obvious faults of the alternatives.

there's a frying pan here - and oooh look - a fire over there! JUMP! :D
Well I don't think either are electable but someone needs to do a huge repair job. Corbyn is hell bent on destroying the Labour party as we know it, so one of the other two will have to try and start the repairs. It literally is a case of anyone but Corbyn now IF people want the Labour party to still exist and still form an opposition.
Well, I'm backing Corbyn, to keep out all the politically PC correct luvies who idolise a war criminal.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by boltonboris » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:10 am

On this occasion, the military are pro-people and I assume, see the public as their.. well, their public.

Shooting them wouldn't exactly garner support.

It's a shame it didn't materialise because the military's approach in Turkey is apparently to keep hold of their historical secular approach to their democracy. Their latest government, not so much.

Turkey are called a democracy, because they hold general elections, but caling them Turkey a democracy because they have elections, is like calling Red Bull a health drink, because it has water in it
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13657
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:13 am

boltonboris wrote:On this occasion, the military are pro-people and I assume, see the public as their.. well, their public.

Shooting them wouldn't exactly garner support.

It's a shame it didn't materialise because the military's approach in Turkey is apparently to keep hold of their historical secular approach to their democracy. Their latest government, not so much.

Turkey are called a democracy, because they hold general elections, but caling them Turkey a democracy because they have elections, is like calling Red Bull a health drink, because it has water in it
Hardly, they were Erogbins mobilised support, all tuned in to the Presidents social network at the same time :lol:

Beefheart
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2918
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:36 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Beefheart » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:16 am

Hoboh wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye. Lets just stick with the guy who has zero interest in winning a GE.

apart from the fact that nobody said that.... it's never a good idea to allow your virulent opposition to ONE person totally blind you to the obvious faults of the alternatives.

there's a frying pan here - and oooh look - a fire over there! JUMP! :D
Well I don't think either are electable but someone needs to do a huge repair job. Corbyn is hell bent on destroying the Labour party as we know it, so one of the other two will have to try and start the repairs. It literally is a case of anyone but Corbyn now IF people want the Labour party to still exist and still form an opposition.
Well, I'm backing Corbyn, to keep out all the politically PC correct luvies who idolise a war criminal.
The politically politically correct? I bet you say PIN number and ATM machine don't you?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38827
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:24 am

Beefheart wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye. Lets just stick with the guy who has zero interest in winning a GE.

apart from the fact that nobody said that.... it's never a good idea to allow your virulent opposition to ONE person totally blind you to the obvious faults of the alternatives.

there's a frying pan here - and oooh look - a fire over there! JUMP! :D
Well I don't think either are electable but someone needs to do a huge repair job. Corbyn is hell bent on destroying the Labour party as we know it, so one of the other two will have to try and start the repairs. It literally is a case of anyone but Corbyn now IF people want the Labour party to still exist and still form an opposition.
Well, I'm backing Corbyn, to keep out all the politically PC correct luvies who idolise a war criminal.
The politically politically correct? I bet you say PIN number and ATM machine don't you?
Well he actually said "politically politically correct correct"......

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:29 am

Come on "feminism has gone too far" - I can get a full house here!
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13657
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:48 am

Beefheart wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye. Lets just stick with the guy who has zero interest in winning a GE.

apart from the fact that nobody said that.... it's never a good idea to allow your virulent opposition to ONE person totally blind you to the obvious faults of the alternatives.

there's a frying pan here - and oooh look - a fire over there! JUMP! :D
Well I don't think either are electable but someone needs to do a huge repair job. Corbyn is hell bent on destroying the Labour party as we know it, so one of the other two will have to try and start the repairs. It literally is a case of anyone but Corbyn now IF people want the Labour party to still exist and still form an opposition.
Well, I'm backing Corbyn, to keep out all the politically PC correct luvies who idolise a war criminal.
The politically politically correct? I bet you say PIN number and ATM machine don't you?
ATM!!! Bollocks it's a cash point machine. :D

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Prufrock » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:01 pm

Inventor of the ATM machine and PIN number died the other day.

May he RIP in peace.

I've been fairly impressed with Owen Smith in what I've seen so far (until that interview which I haven't seen yet). Hadn't heard of him two weeks ago, but he looks proper.

Eagle I actually quite like, but don't think she has it leadership wise. So I'm hoping it's Smith v Corbyn. They're whittling down to one challenger by tomorrow apparently.

Corbs the fav but I'm not sure it's as clear cut as some make out.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38827
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:10 pm

Prufrock wrote:Inventor of the ATM machine and PIN number died the other day.

May he RIP in peace.

I've been fairly impressed with Owen Smith in what I've seen so far (until that interview which I haven't seen yet). Hadn't heard of him two weeks ago, but he looks proper.

Eagle I actually quite like, but don't think she has it leadership wise. So I'm hoping it's Smith v Corbyn. They're whittling down to one challenger by tomorrow apparently.

Corbs the fav but I'm not sure it's as clear cut as some make out.
Polling suggests Corbyn is way out in front of either amongst the membership...

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:36 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Inventor of the ATM machine and PIN number died the other day.

May he RIP in peace.

I've been fairly impressed with Owen Smith in what I've seen so far (until that interview which I haven't seen yet). Hadn't heard of him two weeks ago, but he looks proper.

Eagle I actually quite like, but don't think she has it leadership wise. So I'm hoping it's Smith v Corbyn. They're whittling down to one challenger by tomorrow apparently.

Corbs the fav but I'm not sure it's as clear cut as some make out.
Polling suggests Corbyn is way out in front of either amongst the membership...

damn that loony lefty idea of members being able to vote!

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Prufrock » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:43 pm

He was 56 and 57% the other day. Against two people not many had heard of two months ago. It isn't going to be a coronation this time and he is dreadful, dreadful, when pressured.

Still big favourite, but not impossible. Still lots more stories like this:

http://www.liliangreenwood.co.uk/lilian ... ty_members" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And Thangam Debbonaire to come out.

That link is ridiculous btw
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:50 pm

Prufrock wrote:He was 56 and 57% the other day. Against two people not many had heard of two months ago. It isn't going to be a coronation this time and he is dreadful, dreadful, when pressured.
as is Eagles...

(plus - as I said before - she seems to have one nostril massively bigger than the other - which obv. means she is not to be trusted! Also - her camp appears to have been fabricating stories of homophobic abuse directed at her by "corbynistas" at a meeting that it turns out she wasn't even at... Despite the promises, this fight isn't going to be nice - not even between the ones who say they agree! 8) )

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests