Today I'm angry about.....
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Worthy4England wrote:I've not spotted this bothering you previously. Do you have a soft spot for gay marriage?hoboh wrote: Okay, I conceede that one, I'd be foolish to argue with someone of greater knowledge of the subject and I should have done some research.
Sorry, Hoboh, but you asked for that one.
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
I know, but at least I was honest in admitting I was wrong and humbleBruce Rioja wrote:Worthy4England wrote:I've not spotted this bothering you previously. Do you have a soft spot for gay marriage?hoboh wrote: Okay, I conceede that one, I'd be foolish to argue with someone of greater knowledge of the subject and I should have done some research.
Sorry, Hoboh, but you asked for that one.
To be honest I made my point rather badly attacking just gay marriage, its the slow erosion of many cornerstones of life that bugs.
No doubt that will tickle Le bish
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
some cornerstones need to be eroded - it's how we move forwards...
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:14 pm
- Location: Bury
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Took mine to a little shop on Tonge Moor Road. The laptop was fecked, but the guy there managed to copy everything to my external hard drive for £20.Harry Genshaw wrote:My laptop breaking had no idea how much I relied on it. Had most stuff backed up but photos of the dog (rip ) and some banging choons could be lost forever
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: North London, originally Farnworth
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
As long as the HDD is okay, couple of quid for a caddy, insert drive and copy to another computer although Burnden Paddock's idea is a goodun. £20 for recovery is a bargain.
Don't try to be a great man. Just be a man and let history make up its own mind.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Or how things collapse!thebish wrote:some cornerstones need to be eroded - it's how we move forwards...
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
some things need to collapse!Hoboh wrote:Or how things collapse!thebish wrote:some cornerstones need to be eroded - it's how we move forwards...
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Some things need to be rebuiltthebish wrote:some things need to collapse!Hoboh wrote:Or how things collapse!thebish wrote:some cornerstones need to be eroded - it's how we move forwards...
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
such as?Hoboh wrote:Some things need to be rebuiltthebish wrote:some things need to collapse!Hoboh wrote:Or how things collapse!thebish wrote:some cornerstones need to be eroded - it's how we move forwards...
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Cornerstonesthebish wrote:such as?Hoboh wrote:Some things need to be rebuiltthebish wrote:some things need to collapse!Hoboh wrote:Or how things collapse!thebish wrote:some cornerstones need to be eroded - it's how we move forwards...
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32623
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Top answer.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Just think how depressed he would be if he didn't have a job.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:"Stop adding up the wealth of the poor" Felix Salmon nails the stupidity. http://t.co/JMWe3p6i13" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Given the current state of 'global' governance, does it make sense to talk of a 'system'? Isn't this a bit like discussing whether it's a good thing that 70% of the Earth's surface is water when so many live in cramped conditions.BWFC_Insane wrote:But the bolded bit suggests you think that a system that leads to 85 people being richer than half the world is a good and fair one. So what is the justification for it, in your eyes?
And isn't talk of people being 'richer' another potential category error? Yes, there are plenty of people in the world caused great suffering because of material poverty and disease, but are there not lots of people living simple but contented lives, who would barely register on any $ measurement of their life?
Can we meaningfully compare a depressed wage slave in Slough to somebody happily subsistence farming in Bongo-Bongo Land?
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
It's a good article on why the figure is wrong. I'm not sure it's a particularly convincing idea against the idea of adding up the wealth of the poor though, beyond 'they didn't manage it this time/it's really hard to do'.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:"Stop adding up the wealth of the poor" Felix Salmon nails the stupidity. http://t.co/JMWe3p6i13" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Given the current state of 'global' governance, does it make sense to talk of a 'system'? Isn't this a bit like discussing whether it's a good thing that 70% of the Earth's surface is water when so many live in cramped conditions.BWFC_Insane wrote:But the bolded bit suggests you think that a system that leads to 85 people being richer than half the world is a good and fair one. So what is the justification for it, in your eyes?
And isn't talk of people being 'richer' another potential category error? Yes, there are plenty of people in the world caused great suffering because of material poverty and disease, but are there not lots of people living simple but contented lives, who would barely register on any $ measurement of their life?
Can we meaningfully compare a depressed wage slave in Slough to somebody happily subsistence farming in Bongo-Bongo Land?
The actual idea of adding it up and comparing still seems legit to me. 'The top 85 richest people have $1.7tr!!!!!' isn't as powerful as 'The top 85 richest people in the world have $1.7tr which is the same combined wealth as [massive number of people] who make up [large proportion of the world's population]'.
There's still no doubt that there are a f*ck load of people who don't 'have' $1.7tr' between them. It's just really difficult (maybe impossible - what does 'have' mean?) to put a number on it.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9125
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Went to Middlebrook today against my better judgment as it's always heaving there on a Sunday. We'd seen a dining table we wanted on Wednesday and had gone back to buy it today. In the intervening 3 days the feckin price had gone up by £100 and they weren't for budging.
Needless to say I'll be waiting for the sales at Easter when it will probably be back at Wednesdays price
Needless to say I'll be waiting for the sales at Easter when it will probably be back at Wednesdays price
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
They obviously saw you looking at it.Harry Genshaw wrote:Went to Middlebrook today against my better judgment as it's always heaving there on a Sunday. We'd seen a dining table we wanted on Wednesday and had gone back to buy it today. In the intervening 3 days the feckin price had gone up by £100 and they weren't for budging.
Needless to say I'll be waiting for the sales at Easter when it will probably be back at Wednesdays price
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
If it'd a chain ... & the shopping 'malls' normally are, they usually have little room for manoeuvre .... it may even be the place they are using as a particular price window so they can later drop it and claim the reduced price is a genuine saving.Harry Genshaw wrote:Went to Middlebrook today against my better judgment as it's always heaving there on a Sunday. We'd seen a dining table we wanted on Wednesday and had gone back to buy it today. In the intervening 3 days the feckin price had gone up by £100 and they weren't for budging.
Needless to say I'll be waiting for the sales at Easter when it will probably be back at Wednesdays price
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
I see that Zebedee's turning on the waterworks again.Bijou Bob wrote:I'm offering five internet pounds at 2-1 that Pistorious gets off with it, er, is found not guilty.
Mrs Steenkamp's clearly having none of it, mind. Crikey.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36333
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
I mean feck the fact he shot someone.
He takes in abandoned animals. So that is all ok......
He takes in abandoned animals. So that is all ok......
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
I disagree.Prufrock wrote:
It's a good article on why the figure is wrong. I'm not sure it's a particularly convincing idea against the idea of adding up the wealth of the poor though, beyond 'they didn't manage it this time/it's really hard to do'.
The actual idea of adding it up and comparing still seems legit to me. 'The top 85 richest people have $1.7tr!!!!!' isn't as powerful as 'The top 85 richest people in the world have $1.7tr which is the same combined wealth as [massive number of people] who make up [large proportion of the world's population]'.
There's still no doubt that there are a f*ck load of people who don't 'have' $1.7tr' between them. It's just really difficult (maybe impossible - what does 'have' mean?) to put a number on it.
The nonsense of saying that a a very indebted, perhaps even totally insolvent, banker in New York is a lot worse off than someone with no possessions (but no liabilities) in sub-Saharan Africa is a good hypothetical example that focuses the mind on the folly of searching for and comparing these 'numbers'.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests