What are you watching tonight?

[KeyserSoze]

TRailer for the new Tarantino film, The Hateful Eight, is out

[General Mannerheim]

doesn't fill me with much hope tbh...

dragging his old mates out of the wilderness too, jobs for t'boys!

[Gary the Enfield]

Or it could be a ''we're putting the BAND back together'' moment.

DO YOU SEE THE LIGHT?

Jake: THE BAND!

Reverend Cleophus James: DO YOU SEE THE LIGHT?

Elwood: What light?

Reverend Cleophus James: HAVE YOU SEEEEN THE LIGHT?

Jake: YES! YES! JESUS H. TAP-DANCING CHRIST... I HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT!

[TANGODANCER]

Watched Sexy Beast. Have avoided it so far as the title's very misleading. Great performance by Ben Kingsley. Liked the Gibson Brothers "Cuba" ..and there was Dean Martin's "Sway" as the music.

[General Mannerheim]

Probably my most watched film ever

[Bruce Rioja]

Watched Sexy Beast. Have avoided it so far as the title's very misleading.

Sorry, Tango. You've avoided watching something as the title's very misleading? How could you have possibly known that without having watched it?

[TANGODANCER]

Watched Sexy Beast. Have avoided it so far as the title's very misleading.

Sorry, Tango. You've avoided watching something as the title's very misleading? How could you have possibly known that without having watched it?

Possibly, because having seen it advertised around, I thought it was a sex film?

[Bruce Rioja]

Watched Sexy Beast. Have avoided it so far as the title's very misleading.

Sorry, Tango. You've avoided watching something as the title's very misleading? How could you have possibly known that without having watched it?

Possibly, because having seen it advertised around, I thought it was a sex film?

You saw it advertised as a sex film?

Anyway, IMDB is your friend, especially for a general gist on such matters. Very handy.

[TANGODANCER]

Watched Sexy Beast. Have avoided it so far as the title's very misleading.

Sorry, Tango. You've avoided watching something as the title's very misleading? How could you have possibly known that without having watched it?

Possibly, because having seen it advertised around, I thought it was a sex film?

You saw it advertised as a sex film?

Anyway, IMDB is your friend, especially for a general gist on such matters. Very handy.

Quite what your agenda is on constantly picking up on my posts is beyond me. You're either very short of something to do, can't read or just deliberately being a silly fxcker. I suspect it's a mixture of all three. Either way, it's of little consequence.

[Worthy4England]

You saw it advertised as a sex film? .

Me too, it was on the shelf between Bukakke Party III and Backdoor Angels...

I'm not watching The Postman always rings twice for the same reason. Dirty bastards, them Postmen.

Instead I'm going to watch that historical drama Caligula....

[Bruce Rioja]

Watched Sexy Beast. Have avoided it so far as the title's very misleading.

Sorry, Tango. You've avoided watching something as the title's very misleading? How could you have possibly known that without having watched it?

Possibly, because having seen it advertised around, I thought it was a sex film?

You saw it advertised as a sex film?

Anyway, IMDB is your friend, especially for a general gist on such matters. Very handy.

Quite what your agenda is on constantly picking up on my posts is beyond me. You're either very short of something to do, can't read or just deliberately being a silly fxcker. I suspect it's a mixture of all three. Either way, it's of little consequence.

I'm attempting to engage you in debate but keep coming up against your persecution complex. I shan't bother in future. Go feck yourself. Do keep the hilarious 'paintings' coming though.

[clapton is god]

Had a Spielberg night last night. Started with the original Poltergeist, moved on to Close Encounters and finished with Jaws.

He knows how to make films, he does! Not dated at all.

We watched the remake of Poltergeist on Friday (which is what started this) and it doesn't compare with Spielberg's in the slightest. Scene for scene remake but incredibly poor by comparison.

[TANGODANCER]

Quite what your agenda is on constantly picking up on my posts is beyond me. You're either very short of something to do, can't read or just deliberately being a silly fxcker. I suspect it's a mixture of all three. Either way, it's of little consequence.

I'm attempting to engage you in debate but keep coming up against your persecution complex. I shan't bother in future. Go feck yourself. Do keep the hilarious 'paintings' coming though.

Your childish, spiteful comments put an end to The Painting Thread five/six months ago. I've never bothered posting on it since.

[clapton is god]

Quite what your agenda is on constantly picking up on my posts is beyond me. You're either very short of something to do, can't read or just deliberately being a silly fxcker. I suspect it's a mixture of all three. Either way, it's of little consequence.

I'm attempting to engage you in debate but keep coming up against your persecution complex. I shan't bother in future. Go feck yourself. Do keep the hilarious 'paintings' coming though.

Your childish, spiteful comments put an end to The Painting Thread five/six months ago. I've never bothered posting on it since.

I wish you would. I enjoyed your postings there.

[Bruce Rioja]

Quite what your agenda is on constantly picking up on my posts is beyond me. You're either very short of something to do, can't read or just deliberately being a silly fxcker. I suspect it's a mixture of all three. Either way, it's of little consequence.

I'm attempting to engage you in debate but keep coming up against your persecution complex. I shan't bother in future. Go feck yourself. Do keep the hilarious 'paintings' coming though.

Your childish, spiteful comments put an end to The Painting Thread five/six months ago. I've never bothered posting on it since.

See, once more we find you posting absolute shite. My last post in the 'Painting' thread was made on Friday 3rd January (Page 9), yet your last post in the thread (there being several of your bobbins cracks at art betwixt) was on Monday March 30th. (Page 12), some 3 months later. So, as usual, yer talking shite.

[Bruce Rioja]

Anyway, back to the subject in hand. I've had recommended to me, Zero Dark Thirty (I'm guessing that it isn't a porn flick) which is on Channel 4 at 21:00 tonight, for 3 hours and 5 minutes. Anyone seen it? Is it worth 3 hours and 5 minutes?

[TANGODANCER]

Quite what your agenda is on constantly picking up on my posts is beyond me. You're either very short of something to do, can't read or just deliberately being a silly fxcker. I suspect it's a mixture of all three. Either way, it's of little consequence.

I'm attempting to engage you in debate but keep coming up against your persecution complex. I shan't bother in future. Go feck yourself. Do keep the hilarious 'paintings' coming though.

Your childish, spiteful comments put an end to The Painting Thread five/six months ago. I've never bothered posting on it since.

See, once more we find you posting absolute shite. My last post in the 'Painting' thread was made on Friday 3rd January (Page 9), yet your last post in the thread (there being several of your bobbins cracks at art betwixt) was on Monday March 30th. (Page 12), some 3 months later. So, as usual, yer talking shite.

Oh. believe me, I'm not. The stuff after your January post was all about the BBC Paint Challenge and had some interest on here. When it ended, I had no further interest in going back to your previous vindictive mischief on the Paint Thread. As I said, I haven't posted there since. Your snidey comments as in my "bobbins cracks at art" and "hilarious paintings" made just today, show me what to expect, so I'm sure you'll understand why I won't bother any further.

Apologies to the others for going off track.

[clapton is god]

Anyway, back to the subject in hand. I've had recommended to me, Zero Dark Thirty (I'm guessing that it isn't a porn flick) which is on Channel 4 at 21:00 tonight, for 3 hours and 5 minutes. Anyone seen it? Is it worth 3 hours and 5 minutes?

Yes, a bit hard watching at times, but well worth watching.

[Bruce Rioja]

Anyway, back to the subject in hand. I've had recommended to me, Zero Dark Thirty (I'm guessing that it isn't a porn flick) which is on Channel 4 at 21:00 tonight, for 3 hours and 5 minutes. Anyone seen it? Is it worth 3 hours and 5 minutes?

Yes, a bit hard watching at times, but well worth watching.

Cheers, Clapton. I've set it to record and will watch it during the week.

[Burnden Paddock]

Sorry Bruce. I know we're friends IRL but I can't defend you here. TD gave his imo perfectly acceptable reason for not having watched the film. You have responded by attempting to ridicule his explanation and been particularly rude to a bloke who is 75 years old ffs! Apols if i'm wrong on that TD.

With the greatest of respect, how would you feel if someone had spoken like that to one of your parents? Whether it be in person, or on a forum from which they clearly get a lot of enjoyment.

We're all different, so let's live and let live!