The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
We haven't been invaded since I was born. Since any of us were born. We haven't been invaded since Leicester City football club existed, or since America was discovered, or since the year wasn't 1066. I'm not sure any of them are consequential however. NATO has them, USA has them, if we got rid of it people aren't suddenly going to think oh look now we can Nuke the UK.Worthy4England wrote:We haven't been invaded since we had it?thebish wrote:remind me exactly how Trident IS defending us?Hobinho wrote: Hobo liked Clegg but not the whimpish politics he has to stand on he should say what would replace trident to defend us.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Indeed, kept banging on about how we need change without ever saying how. All he seemed to have was cutting money from the deficit, without saying how, and refusing to guarentee it wouldn't come from the important stuff, anecdotes about black chaps he'd met, and properly rubbish comparisons between the country and small businesses.Athers wrote:Contribute to some sort of NATO fund I'm guessing, maybe pay USA a little rent or something, who knows.Hobinho wrote: Hobo liked Clegg but not the whimpish politics he has to stand on he should say what would replace trident to defend us.
You guys have said most of the things I took from it. DC strikes me as trying to be all Obama on us and doing it rather badly. It's almost like he wants to say 'It's our time'. I didn't like the whole 'Joe the Plumber' in the US debates and I didn't care for it tonight either.
Clegg was going to benefit from this, although I did chuckle when he brought out the 4,000 pages from Whitehall statistic with great glee, having already been beaten to it a minute earlier.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Yes, but if we're going to have a nuclear war, we need to have a red button of our own to press - otherwise it'll be a terrible let down.Prufrock wrote:We haven't been invaded since I was born. Since any of us were born. We haven't been invaded since Leicester City football club existed, or since America was discovered, or since the year wasn't 1066. I'm not sure any of them are consequential however. NATO has them, USA has them, if we got rid of it people aren't suddenly going to think oh look now we can Nuke the UK.Worthy4England wrote:We haven't been invaded since we had it?thebish wrote:remind me exactly how Trident IS defending us?Hobinho wrote: Hobo liked Clegg but not the whimpish politics he has to stand on he should say what would replace trident to defend us.
That is true. It would be a bit of an anti-climax.Worthy4England wrote:Yes, but if we're going to have a nuclear war, we need to have a red button of our own to press - otherwise it'll be a terrible let down.Prufrock wrote:We haven't been invaded since I was born. Since any of us were born. We haven't been invaded since Leicester City football club existed, or since America was discovered, or since the year wasn't 1066. I'm not sure any of them are consequential however. NATO has them, USA has them, if we got rid of it people aren't suddenly going to think oh look now we can Nuke the UK.Worthy4England wrote:We haven't been invaded since we had it?thebish wrote:remind me exactly how Trident IS defending us?Hobinho wrote: Hobo liked Clegg but not the whimpish politics he has to stand on he should say what would replace trident to defend us.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
we haven't been invaded since Windows XP was launched - but I wouldn't credit Windows XP with that....Worthy4England wrote:We haven't been invaded since we had it?thebish wrote:remind me exactly how Trident IS defending us?Hobinho wrote: Hobo liked Clegg but not the whimpish politics he has to stand on he should say what would replace trident to defend us.
the concurrence of two events or facts does not imply a connection.
(ahh - I see Pru made the same point! oops!)
ok - WHO is Trident defending us from?
Last edited by thebish on Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
I'd say that that's pretty much my take on it too, Worthy. Only, I thought that after Brown had made a bit of a cock of himself by referencing poster campaigns once, he wouldn't have gone on to try and bring the subject up again.Worthy4England wrote:Clegg won hands down. He did try and talk policies and the cost of them (even though I don't agree with some of them).
Cameron came across as way more personable than Brown, but the anecdotes and ducking on substantive responses didn't do him any favours. Don't think he did as well as he would have wanted.
Brown was not good - but marginally better than I thought he might have been.
Either way, none of them told me anything to make me think any differently
May the bridges I burn light your way
Been told he has got to seem funny and likeable hasn't he? Which is silly, coz it's irellevant, and he's REALLY bad at it. There was a clip of him on the news where he was asked two trivial throwaway questions and his answers to both made no sense as answers to those questions. He's not very good at interacting with people. He'd be rubbish to have a pint with, as would all of them incidentally.Bruce Rioja wrote:I'd say that that's pretty much my take on it too, Worthy. Only, I thought that after Brown had made a bit of a cock of himself by referencing poster campaigns once, he wouldn't have gone on to try and bring the subject up again.Worthy4England wrote:Clegg won hands down. He did try and talk policies and the cost of them (even though I don't agree with some of them).
Cameron came across as way more personable than Brown, but the anecdotes and ducking on substantive responses didn't do him any favours. Don't think he did as well as he would have wanted.
Brown was not good - but marginally better than I thought he might have been.
Either way, none of them told me anything to make me think any differently
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Prufrock wrote:Been told he has got to seem funny and likeable hasn't he? Which is silly, coz it's irellevant, and he's REALLY bad at it. There was a clip of him on the news where he was asked two trivial throwaway questions and his answers to both made no sense as answers to those questions. He's not very good at interacting with people. He'd be rubbish to have a pint with, as would all of them incidentally.Bruce Rioja wrote:I'd say that that's pretty much my take on it too, Worthy. Only, I thought that after Brown had made a bit of a cock of himself by referencing poster campaigns once, he wouldn't have gone on to try and bring the subject up again.Worthy4England wrote:Clegg won hands down. He did try and talk policies and the cost of them (even though I don't agree with some of them).
Cameron came across as way more personable than Brown, but the anecdotes and ducking on substantive responses didn't do him any favours. Don't think he did as well as he would have wanted.
Brown was not good - but marginally better than I thought he might have been.
Either way, none of them told me anything to make me think any differently
Cameron would leave a slimy silvery trail up the side of your beer glass.... <shudder>
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Indeed - you probably woudn't want to see a stand up set from Brown.Bruce Rioja wrote:I'd say that that's pretty much my take on it too, Worthy. Only, I thought that after Brown had made a bit of a cock of himself by referencing poster campaigns once, he wouldn't have gone on to try and bring the subject up again.Worthy4England wrote:Clegg won hands down. He did try and talk policies and the cost of them (even though I don't agree with some of them).
Cameron came across as way more personable than Brown, but the anecdotes and ducking on substantive responses didn't do him any favours. Don't think he did as well as he would have wanted.
Brown was not good - but marginally better than I thought he might have been.
Either way, none of them told me anything to make me think any differently
Then again, you probably wouldn't want to meet a black man with Cameron or read the same 4,000 page e-mails as Clegg.

did anyone else watch newsnight?
how crap was that??
they had a loooooooooong section that was filled with:
1. the reactions of a "carefully selected" focus group of 36 people who pressed buttons to make a wormy line on the screen go up and down depending on whether they liked what was being said (I suppose - mildly informative - no approval at all, for instance, for any of the pally anecdotes.)
2. reading out dozens of moronic tweets from internet morons
3. reading out moronic comments on the BBC election forum from more random internet morons
4. dislaying word clouds of everything the leaders had said which were supposed to give a flavour of what each leader finds important (the more you say it - the bigger the word) - but the biggest and prominent words were words like "from" and he concluded "well - I suppose those are the words you would find in any speech."
I don't want Newsnight to appeal to Noddy - there are not THAT many programmes that discuss the issues seriously - why should EVERY election program have to appeal to a 4 year old?
how crap was that??
they had a loooooooooong section that was filled with:
1. the reactions of a "carefully selected" focus group of 36 people who pressed buttons to make a wormy line on the screen go up and down depending on whether they liked what was being said (I suppose - mildly informative - no approval at all, for instance, for any of the pally anecdotes.)
2. reading out dozens of moronic tweets from internet morons
3. reading out moronic comments on the BBC election forum from more random internet morons
4. dislaying word clouds of everything the leaders had said which were supposed to give a flavour of what each leader finds important (the more you say it - the bigger the word) - but the biggest and prominent words were words like "from" and he concluded "well - I suppose those are the words you would find in any speech."
I don't want Newsnight to appeal to Noddy - there are not THAT many programmes that discuss the issues seriously - why should EVERY election program have to appeal to a 4 year old?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
I know these wimps, what are they like?... Hobo wants trident to sort out afghanistan and iraq and camels in africa (Hobinho wrote:Clegg was good seemed to be most comfortable but
He does not seem like the guy who would tell the Argies to get their bag fat ass off the Falklands type of guy.
Mr C was a bit too wooden and needs to relax a bit more and watch the patronising bits a little, put a bit more substance in there.
Brown? Solid like a petrified tree stump! why not be bold Gordon and say you stand by your record of achievement so far? You are proud aren't you?![]()
Hobo liked Clegg but not the whimpish politics he has to stand on he should say what would replace trident to defend us.

Hobo, why do you reckon that these Germans, or Italians, or Spaniards, or Luxembourgeois don't feel undefended by not havin nuclear weapons?
That said, I'd like to encourage you towards a vote for clegg's party in Bolton NE, I think you should fall in love with him, and convince all your friends and family... Go, hobo...
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
I had the misfortune to watch that too...I will never get that 45 minutes of my life back (or however long it was)thebish wrote:did anyone else watch newsnight?
how crap was that??
they had a loooooooooong section that was filled with:
1. the reactions of a "carefully selected" focus group of 36 people who pressed buttons to make a wormy line on the screen go up and down depending on whether they liked what was being said (I suppose - mildly informative - no approval at all, for instance, for any of the pally anecdotes.)
2. reading out dozens of moronic tweets from internet morons
3. reading out moronic comments on the BBC election forum from more random internet morons
4. dislaying word clouds of everything the leaders had said which were supposed to give a flavour of what each leader finds important (the more you say it - the bigger the word) - but the biggest and prominent words were words like "from" and he concluded "well - I suppose those are the words you would find in any speech."
I don't want Newsnight to appeal to Noddy - there are not THAT many programmes that discuss the issues seriously - why should EVERY election program have to appeal to a 4 year old?

I didn't watch Newsnight after, but the 'worm' is apparently Australian and the 'word cloud' is American.
Did 'Quango' appear in Camerons? Or was it just TAX ON JOBS in huge letters across the middle?
Did 'Quango' appear in Camerons? Or was it just TAX ON JOBS in huge letters across the middle?
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
here's summat I don't get about Tory policy..
they are supposed to have as a central plank more localism - handing down power and decision making locally - small government etc...
yet.. they have announced (seemingly arbitrarily) this big policy that ALL cancer drugs - regardless of NICE recommendations about cost-effectiveness over other treatments - will be available to anyone who wants them.
now... what if an area has a much bigger preponderance of alzheimers patients - and locally they want to skew the budget towards alzheimers treatment - but can't because all of the budget is taken up with cancer drugs on demand? who wins - big government or localism?
anyone who proposes "small government" and "localism" should be BANNED from ever using the phrase "post code lottery" (as Cameron does with startling regularity considering that he is supposed to support small governemnt and local decisions over priorities.)
they are supposed to have as a central plank more localism - handing down power and decision making locally - small government etc...
yet.. they have announced (seemingly arbitrarily) this big policy that ALL cancer drugs - regardless of NICE recommendations about cost-effectiveness over other treatments - will be available to anyone who wants them.
now... what if an area has a much bigger preponderance of alzheimers patients - and locally they want to skew the budget towards alzheimers treatment - but can't because all of the budget is taken up with cancer drugs on demand? who wins - big government or localism?
anyone who proposes "small government" and "localism" should be BANNED from ever using the phrase "post code lottery" (as Cameron does with startling regularity considering that he is supposed to support small governemnt and local decisions over priorities.)
I'm still not quite getting how you can cut £6billion and lower taxes without something major being affected. I thought Clegg nailed him pretty well on the waste thing. It's not that easy, if waste was that easy to eradicate, surely, by now, people would have.thebish wrote:here's summat I don't get about Tory policy..
they are supposed to have as a central plank more localism - handing down power and decision making locally - small government etc...
yet.. they have announced (seemingly arbitrarily) this big policy that ALL cancer drugs - regardless of NICE recommendations about cost-effectiveness over other treatments - will be available to anyone who wants them.
now... what if an area has a much bigger preponderance of alzheimers patients - and locally they want to skew the budget towards alzheimers treatment - but can't because all of the budget is taken up with cancer drugs on demand? who wins - big government or localism?
anyone who proposes "small government" and "localism" should be BANNED from ever using the phrase "post code lottery" (as Cameron does with startling regularity considering that he is supposed to support small governemnt and local decisions over priorities.)
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Not a game changer. Clegg won by being himself and distinctive, whilst Cameron and Brown threw the same tired lines about NI and public services at each other like they were trapped in an every-ten-minutes version of Groundhog Day.
"I agree with Nick" by both Cambo and Gordo suggests theres only one vote they're interested in post-May 6.
"I agree with Nick" by both Cambo and Gordo suggests theres only one vote they're interested in post-May 6.
Indeed.ratbert wrote:Not a game changer. Clegg won by being himself and distinctive, whilst Cameron and Brown threw the same tired lines about NI and public services at each other like they were trapped in an every-ten-minutes version of Groundhog Day.
"I agree with Nick" by both Cambo and Gordo suggests theres only one vote they're interested in post-May 6.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests