creeeeeckeeeett
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Based on the one I suffered when I was 13jimbo wrote:Based on what? He could be back tomorrow, could be 3 months.Lofthouse Lower wrote:Hamstring injury will be a month out
Had England won the toss we'd have had Indjar out by now.
Anyway, good start this morning.

Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Ooops. Better stop saying stuff. Sorry Trotty!
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
thebish wrote:also... it seems Zaheer Khan is kacked - so they (essentially) only have three bowlers - there is some talk that Rahul Dravid is preparing to keep wicket at some point allowing Mahendra Singh Dhoni to turn his emergency arm over...
Is there still a rule saying that any player who dons the wicketkeeper's gloves is not allowed to bowl in that innings/match?
That happened to our team when we played...at under 13s level ffs.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Fair enough, hamstrings are interesting things. Recovery time depends on a whole host of factors including not just which sport you play, but what position you play in that sport. Good theory behind it all.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
If you're me - a month
If you're Rat Fabregas - til you get your move
If you're Rat Fabregas - til you get your move
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
I don't believe there is such a rule - a wicket keeper can bowl like anyone else can...Verbal wrote:thebish wrote:also... it seems Zaheer Khan is kacked - so they (essentially) only have three bowlers - there is some talk that Rahul Dravid is preparing to keep wicket at some point allowing Mahendra Singh Dhoni to turn his emergency arm over...
Is there still a rule saying that any player who dons the wicketkeeper's gloves is not allowed to bowl in that innings/match?
That happened to our team when we played...at under 13s level ffs.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
No. Pretty sure that will have just been a local league rule. In my under 13 team our best 2 keepers happened to be our best 2 bowlers, so either I would start off with the gloves, let the other lad open up with his 4 overs and then switch, or vice versa.Verbal wrote:thebish wrote:also... it seems Zaheer Khan is kacked - so they (essentially) only have three bowlers - there is some talk that Rahul Dravid is preparing to keep wicket at some point allowing Mahendra Singh Dhoni to turn his emergency arm over...
Is there still a rule saying that any player who dons the wicketkeeper's gloves is not allowed to bowl in that innings/match?
That happened to our team when we played...at under 13s level ffs.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
it was boycott's fault... just before trotty went - he said this..jimbo wrote:Ooops. Better stop saying stuff. Sorry Trotty!
"If you are one of the batsmen waiting to come in for England, in a quiet moment in the dressing-room you are secretly hoping one of your team-mate's (sic) makes a mistake and gets out so you can have a bat in this. I don't see anything special about India's bowling."
Last edited by thebish on Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
He's right in a way. Looks like a lovely day to make runs. India seem pretty subdued in the field, and their best bowler is out of the attack, meaning they'll be heavily reliant on their spinner on day 2 of a test match, and the other 2 'quicks' will be fooked in a bit. Definite time to cash in.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
somehow this description could only be made of the crowd at a test match...
Packed stands around the verdant ground, glasses glinting in the bright sunshine, newspapers being folded and unfurled.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Pieterson was out there - but saved by the inconclusive video evidence...
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
BBC wrote:Bell lofts Harbhajan over square leg with the sweetest of timing, a four so palatable you could serve it for supper.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8578
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
- Location: Mid Sussex
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Thats because cricket is boring! I'd bring along something to read as well. You wouldn't do that when watching football! (or maybe you do when watching Bolton...)thebish wrote:somehow this description could only be made of the crowd at a test match...
Packed stands around the verdant ground, glasses glinting in the bright sunshine, newspapers being folded and unfurled.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
201 for three now... we could kack this up - but, keep our heads and there is no reason why we can't milk this attack dry this afternoon as Kumar tires...
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Dhoni is bowling (nearly bagging KP) - and Dravid is all padded up behind the stumps...
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
phew - not out again! Dhoni - 2 balls - 2 big scares - wasted behind the stumps!!
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
bell - then almost immediately - Morgan - and it's 5 down...
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Going a bit horribly wrong atm.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
we're still tanking along at a decent rate of knots...Wandering Willy wrote:Going a bit horribly wrong atm.
447-7 and counting 500 well within reach - and summat we would have settled for having been put in...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests